Quality of Life Model for Older Patients With AML

Development of a Quality of Life Decision-Making Model for Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The purpose of this study is to describe the differences in quality of life (QOL) among newly diagnosed patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to help design a patient decision-making QOL model for aligning patients' choice of treatment with what matters the most to them.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

206

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • Moffitt Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients of the Malignant Hematology Department or Senior Adult Oncology Division at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 60 years of age or older
  • Newly diagnosed with pathology-confirmed diagnosis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  • Within 7 days of starting a new treatment
  • Must be able to read and speak English at the 8th grade level

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 60 years of age
  • Other malignancy, dementia, traumatic brain injury or individuals with central nervous system involvement of their leukemia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in Quality of Life score between patients receiving intensive versus non-intensive chemotherapy
Time Frame: At baseline and at 30, 60, 90 and 180 days post treatment
Difference in Quality of Life between newly diagnosed AML patients 60 years of age and older receiving intensive versus non-intensive chemotherapy. Quality of Life will be measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, Leukemia Version (FACT-Leu), a 44-item self reported leukemia specific questionnaire. The FACT-Leu uses a 0-4 Likert scale, 0=not at all and 4=very much. Positive items receive scores from 0-4 points, and negative items are scored from 4-0 points.The FACT-Leu scores are obtained by summing item responses coded so that larger scores indicate better QOL. The leukemia subscale has been validated. A meaningful clinical change for the FACT-Leu is a 13-17 point difference out of a maximum score of 176.
At baseline and at 30, 60, 90 and 180 days post treatment
Difference in Quality of Life score between patients with varying disease characteristics
Time Frame: At baseline and at 30, 60, 90 and 180 days post treatment
Difference in Quality of Life score between patients with varying disease characteristics such as age, performance status, functional status, comorbidity, fatigue, symptoms, blast percentage, transfusion dependence and cytogenic risk group. Quality of Life will be measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, Leukemia Version (FACT-Leu), a 44-item self reported leukemia specific questionnaire. The FACT-Leu uses a 0-4 Likert scale, 0=not at all and 4=very much. Positive items receive scores from 0-4 points, and negative items are scored from 4-0 points. The FACT-Leu scores are obtained by summing item responses coded so that larger scores indicate better QOL. The leukemia subscale has been validated. A meaningful clinical change for the FACT-Leu is a 13-17 point difference out of a maximum score of 176.
At baseline and at 30, 60, 90 and 180 days post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sara Tinsley, PhD, APRN, Moffitt Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MCC-20585

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

3
Subscribe