Assessment of Functional Capacity, Pain, Cognitive and Respiratory Functions in Lung Cancer Survivors

June 11, 2020 updated by: Kübra Kılıç, Hacettepe University
Serious side effects occurs with disease and treatments in survival after lung cancer. For this reason, functional capacity, cognitive status, pain perception and respiratory functions may be affected in lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate respiratory function, respiratory muscle strength and endurance, functional capacity, pain, cognitive status level, and physical activity in lung cancer patients and compare with the findings of healthy subjects

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This study was participated lung cancer patients survivors. Patients' pulmonary function test, functional capacity, respiratory muscle strength and endurance, pain and cognitive status was assessed and recorded.

Pulmonary function testing (PFT), mouth pressure measurement (MIP- maximal inspiratory pressure and MEP- maximal expiratory pressure), respiratory muscle endurance test, six minute walk test (6MWT) and pain threshold and tolerance test were used. In addition to physiological measurements, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale was used to evaluate cognitive status, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used to determine the level of physical activity.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Lung cancer patients -> patients who were not under active cancer treatments Healthy -> No lung disease and systemic disease that affected outcome measure

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cooperation
  • lung cancer patients who had a stable condition

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active cancer treatments
  • Brain metastasis story
  • Any orthopedic disease impairs walking, balance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Lung cancer patients
Lung cancer survivors who had stable conditions and routine follow-up at Hacettepe University Oncology Hospital
Six minute walk test used assessment of functional capacity. For respiratory function mouth pressures, for cognitive functions MoCA scale and for pain assessment pain threshold and tolerance test assessed.
Other Names:
  • Exercise capacity
Healthy subjects
No health problems related or affect outcome measure parameters examined in this study.
Six minute walk test used assessment of functional capacity. For respiratory function mouth pressures, for cognitive functions MoCA scale and for pain assessment pain threshold and tolerance test assessed.
Other Names:
  • Exercise capacity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional capacity
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Six minute walk test: Distance walked in six minute was recorded
15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory muscle endurance
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Pressure time unit: A constant load test was used to evaluate respiratory muscle endurance. Using a PowerBreathe device (HaB International Ltd., Southam, UK), the participants were asked to breathe maintaining a constant threshold (60% of MIP) until task failure, and the test duration was recorded. Results were obtained by multiplying the set pressure by the test duration
10 minutes
Respiratory muscle strength assessment
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Respiratory muscle strength was evaluated by measuring maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP).
10 minutes
Pulmonary functions test
Time Frame: 15 minutes
pulmonary functions assessment via spirometry
15 minutes
Cognition using MoCA-Test
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Cognitive function was evaluated with the secreening tool the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The MoCA is a 30-point screening tool. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
10 minutes
Pressure pain threshold assessment
Time Frame: 15 minute
Pressure pain threshold was evaluated via algometer. The pressure at which the individual first reported pain was recorded.
15 minute
Pressure pain tolerance assessment
Time Frame: 15 minute
Pressure pain tolerance test was evaluated via algometer.The pressure at which the individual last pressure point at which they could endure the pain was recorded.
15 minute
Physical activity level
Time Frame: 5 minutes
International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form
5 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Saadettin Kilickap, Professor, Hacettepe University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 17, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe