Jedi Grip Versus Double Operator Technique For Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Block

July 13, 2020 updated by: ismail aytaç, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

A Prospective, Randomized, Observer-Blinded Comparison Between Single And Double Operator In Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Block: Jedi Grip Versus Conventional Double Operator Technique

The investigators aimed to compare the block characteristics of the single operator "jedi grip" technique and the conventional double operator technique.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Patients undergoing hand, wrist, elbow and forearm surgery randomly assigned two groups (Group I: Jedi grip and Group II: Conventional double operator technique). By a blind observer, the block characteristics were evaluated and recorded .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06600
        • Ankara City Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • undergoing elective hand, wrist and forearm surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hepatic or renal failure
  • serious cardiac or pulmoner disease
  • local or systemic infection
  • sepsis
  • coagulation disorder
  • neurological, muscular or psychiatric disease
  • body mass index (BMI) below 18.5 or above 35
  • drug and substance abuse
  • pregnancy
  • refusal of regional anesthesia
  • history of allergy to local anesthetics
  • mental-motor retardation (inability to consent or assess the visual analog scale(VAS) pain score)
  • preoperative long-term NSAIDs or opioid use.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group I
USG guided infraclavicular block with single operator jedi grip technique
USG guided infraclavicular block was applied to patients either by conventional two-person technique or by one person Jedi technique according to the allocated group. On Group I single operator controlled the probe with one hand while controlling the needle and the syringe on the other hand with the Jedi technique. The needle was held between the index finger and the middle phalanx of the middle finger, and the syringe was held with fingers 4 and 5, with the plunger part to the thumb in the palm. On Group II, operator used the probe and needle with different hands while an assistant controlling the syringe to aspirate or inject local anesthetic.
Active Comparator: Group 2
USG guided infraclavicular block with conventional double operator technique
USG guided infraclavicular block was applied to patients either by conventional two-person technique or by one person Jedi technique according to the allocated group. On Group I single operator controlled the probe with one hand while controlling the needle and the syringe on the other hand with the Jedi technique. The needle was held between the index finger and the middle phalanx of the middle finger, and the syringe was held with fingers 4 and 5, with the plunger part to the thumb in the palm. On Group II, operator used the probe and needle with different hands while an assistant controlling the syringe to aspirate or inject local anesthetic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
block performance time
Time Frame: during block application
teh sum of imaging and needling time
during block application
block success
Time Frame: during surgery
incidence of ( %) surgery with successful anesthesia
during surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensory block onset time
Time Frame: before surgery
Sensory blockage was evaluated and graded; from lateral to the forearm, the volar face of the thumb, volar face of the 5th finger and lateral side of the hand back; for musculocutaneous, median, ulnar and radial nerves, respectively. Graduation was according to a previously validated 3-point scale using a cold test: 0 = no block, 1 = analgesia (patient can feel touch, not cold), and 2 = anesthesia (patient cannot feel touch)
before surgery
motor block onset time
Time Frame: before surgery
blockage was evaluated and graded; with elbow flexion, thumb abduction, thumb opposition, thumb adduction for musculocutaneous, radial, median, ulnar nerves respectively. Motor blockage graduation was also according to a (validated) 3-point scale: 0 = no block, 1 = paresis and 2 = paralysis.
before surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: İsmail Aytac, Ankara City Hospital Anesthesiology Department

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 14, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 3, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 3, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E-18-1935

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound

Clinical Trials on USG guided infraclavicular block

Subscribe