Evaluation of an Online Application for Point of Care Ultrasound Training in General Internal Medicine Residents

January 20, 2026 updated by: Tudor Cosma, Kantonsspital Baden

This study compares Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) training in two hospitals, one that uses an online application for supervision and one that does not use the application. The goal of this trial is to learn if POCUS supervision using the online application is associated with improved POCUS skills in residents in General Internal Medicine (GIM). The main question it aims to answer is:

- Do POCUS skills improve more during 6 months in GIM residents supervised using the application than in GIM residents who do not use the application?

Further questions the study aims to answer are:

  • Do residents using the application perform more POCUS exams during 6 months than residents not using the application?
  • Are residents using the application more satisfied with their POCUS training than residents not using the application?

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

56

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Canton of Aargau
      • Baden, Canton of Aargau, Switzerland, 5404
        • Kantonsspital Baden
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tudor Cosma, MD
    • Canton of Zurich
      • Schlieren, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, 8952

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

General internal medicine residents at two hospitals in Switzerland

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • General Internal Medicine resident employed at one of the study sites for at least 2 months
  • Probably or definitely interested in achieving POCUS certification (mandatory for the General Internal Medicine specialisation in Switzerland)
  • Basic ultrasound course completed (Basic course Abdominal ultrasound or Emergency ultrasound)
  • Will spend at least 3 months within a rotation where POCUS training is offered during the 6 months after baseline assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Definitely or probably not interested in achieving POCUS certification
  • Has already performed more than 80 supervised and more than 160 total POCUS exams
  • Will end employment at the study site less than 7 months after baseline assessment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
POCUS supervision using application
This group is supervised using the online application.
Usual POCUS supervision
This group receives usual POCUS supervision, without using the application.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in POCUS skills
Time Frame: Post-test 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) from pre-test
POCUS skills will be evaluated on healthy volunteers by video-recorded OSCE
Post-test 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) from pre-test

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of POCUS exams performed
Time Frame: During 6 months after baseline assessment (pre-test)
In the cohort using the application, the number is automatically recorded. The usual supervision cohort will manually record the number of exams.
During 6 months after baseline assessment (pre-test)
Number of supervised POCUS exams performed
Time Frame: During 6 months after baseline assessment (pre-test)
In the cohort using the application, the number is automatically recorded. The usual supervision cohort will manually record the number of exams.
During 6 months after baseline assessment (pre-test)
Number of directly supervised POCUS exams performed
Time Frame: During 6 months after baseline assessment (pre-test)
Direct supervision means that the supervisor is present during the exam. In the cohort using the application, the number is automatically recorded. The usual supervision cohort will manually record the number of exams.
During 6 months after baseline assessment (pre-test)
Change in satisfaction and engagement with POCUS training
Time Frame: Follow-up assessment 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) after baseline assessment
Measured with a survey
Follow-up assessment 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) after baseline assessment
Change in self-assessed POCUS competency
Time Frame: Follow-up assessment 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) after baseline assessment
Assessed with a survey. Included since the objective evaluation (primary outcome) will not assess all regions that residents are trained to examine, in order to keep the evaluation feasible.
Follow-up assessment 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) after baseline assessment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usefulness of the online application
Time Frame: 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) after baseline assessment
Assessed with a survey, only in the cohort using the application
6 months (+/- 2 weeks) after baseline assessment
Change from baseline in POCUS skills within the individual cohorts
Time Frame: Post-test 6 month (+/- 2 weeks) from pre-test
Evaluating how POCUS skills evolve during 6 months in each of the individual study arms.
Post-test 6 month (+/- 2 weeks) from pre-test

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Maria M Wertli, MD PhD, Kantonsspital Baden

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared in compliance with the national and international privacy regulations and after appropriate approval.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound Evaluation

Subscribe