Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block and Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Block

April 25, 2017 updated by: Ariane Boivin, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Single Injection Infraclavicular Block or Ultrasound-Guided Double Injection Axillary Block : A Non-inferiority Randomized Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of complete sensory block at 30 minutes following ultrasound-guided single injection infraclavicular block and ultrasound-guided double injection axillary block. The investigators research hypothesis is that both blocks will show comparable rates of complete sensory block at 30 minutes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

224

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Québec, Canada, G1J 1Z4
        • Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus
      • Québec, Canada, G1S 4L8
        • Hôpital de Saint-Sacrement

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Class 1 to 3
  • Undergoing a surgery at the elbow, forearm, wrist or hand under regional anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Body mass index more than 40 kg/m2
  • Weight less than 45 kg
  • Patient refusal
  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, local infection at the puncture site, systemic infection)
  • Previous neurological deficit in the operated arm
  • Severe renal or hepatic failure
  • Prior surgery in the axillary or infraclavicular area
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block
Ultrasound-guided single injection infraclavicular block
Ultrasound-guided single injection infraclavicular block: using an in-plane technique, 30 mL of mepivacaine 1.5% is injected at the posterior aspect of the artery.
Active Comparator: Ultrasound-guided axillary block
Ultrasound-guided double injection axillary block
Ultrasound-guided double injection axillary block: using an in-plane technique, 25 mL of mepivacaine 1.5% is injected postero-medial to the artery. During needle withdrawal, 5 mL of the same solution is injected close to the musculocutaneous nerve.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients With Complete Sensory Block
Time Frame: 30 minutes after block completion
Complete sensory block is defined by anesthesia to cold sensation in the ulnar, radial, median and musculocutaneous nerves territories.
30 minutes after block completion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients With Complete Motor Blocks
Time Frame: 30 minutes after block completion
Complete motor block is defined by paralysis in the ulnar, radial, median and musculocutaneous nerves territories.
30 minutes after block completion
Time to Complete Sensory Block.
Time Frame: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes after block completion
Complete sensory block is defined by anesthesia to cold sensation in the median, ulnar, radial and musculocutaneous nerves territories.
5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes after block completion
Time to Complete Motor Block
Time Frame: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes after block completion
Complete motor block is defined by paralysis in the median, ulnar, radial and musculocutaneous nerves territories.
5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes after block completion
Surgical Block Success Rate
Time Frame: End of surgery
Surgical block success is defined by a nerve block allowing surgery without a rescue block, an infiltration of local anesthetics by the surgeon, administration of analgesics for pain in the surgical field or a general anesthesia.
End of surgery
Performance Time of the Nerve Block
Time Frame: During the performance of the block
Performance time is defined as the sum of imaging time (defined as the time elapsed from the moment the Doppler probe is in contact with the patient to the insertion of the Tuohy needle) and needling time (from the insertion of the needle to its complete removal).
During the performance of the block
Procedure-related Pain on a Visual Analog Pain Scale
Time Frame: After the nerve block procedure ended, up to 5 minutes.
Pain was evaluated by the patient on a visual analog pain scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain of their life).
After the nerve block procedure ended, up to 5 minutes.
Number of Patients With Postoperative Adverse Events Related to Nerve Block
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Adverse events were defined by residual numbness, loss of sensitivity or weakness in the operated arm related to block performance or signs of hematoma or infection at the puncture site.
24 hours after surgery
Number of Patients With Postoperative Adverse Events Related to Nerve Block
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
Adverse events were defined by residual numbness, loss of sensitivity or weakness in the operated arm related to block performance or signs of hematoma or infection at the puncture site.
1 month after surgery
Duration of Surgery
Time Frame: The end of surgery
The end of surgery
Tourniquet Use
Time Frame: The end of surgery
Number of participants who had a tourniquet during the surgery
The end of surgery
Duration of Tourniquet
Time Frame: The end of surgery
The total time the tourniquet was left inflated
The end of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ariane Boivin, MD, CHU de Québec
  • Principal Investigator: Marie-Josée Nadeau, MD, CHU de Québec
  • Principal Investigator: Nicolas Dion, MD, CHU de Québec
  • Principal Investigator: Simon Lévesque, MD, CHU de Québec
  • Principal Investigator: Pierre C. Nicole, MD, CHU de Québec
  • Principal Investigator: Alexis F. Turgeon, MD, Msc, CHU de Québec

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 4, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PEJ-666

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block

Subscribe