- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04504578
Efficacy and Safety ofCACXL in the Treatment of Keratoconus With Thin Corneas (CACXL)
August 6, 2020 updated by: Moustafa Nour, Kasr El Aini Hospital
Efficacy and Safety of Contact Lens-assisted Corneal Cross- Linking in the Treatment of Keratoconus With Thin Corneas
The aim of this study is to detect the safety and effectiveness of contact lens assisted corneal cross linking in managing progressive keratoconus with thin corneas CACXL was done for 40 eyes of 30 of keratoconic patients presented to cornea outpatient clinic in Kasr Alainy teaching hospital The UDVA ,BDVA KMAX, thinnest corneal thickness pre-operative and 9 months postoperatively and the endothelial cell count was measured preoperative and 3 months postoperative Demarcation line was measured after 1 month by using ASOCT There was statistical significant difference in UDVA and BDVA, there was stabilization of Kmax there was decrease in endothelial cell count but not statistically significant According to results the procedure seems to be effective and safe un managing progressive keratoconus.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Corneal collagen cross linking showed effective results in stabilizing progressive keratoconic corneas.
It is the only treatment that halts progression of keratoconus, It was first described in 1998 by Spoerl et al .
A major limitation of the procedure that it cannot be used in corneas with pachymetry less than400 micrometers based on the fact that an irradiance of 0.37 mW/cm2 has been found to be cytotoxic for the endothelial cell layer.
Since the absorption coefficient for the human corneas is 70 cm-1 and the intended surface irradiance is 3.0 mW/cm2, the 0.37 mW/cm2 irradiance is reached at 300 microns depth.
In a 400 microns thick cornea saturated with riboflavin, the irradiance at the endothelial level is 0.18 mW/cm2, which is a factor of 2 smaller than the damage threshold.
Therefore, the 400 microns limit is considered to be a safe limit to protect the endothelium and intraocular structures from the hazards of UV irradiation 12 However , the patients with advanced ectasia who are desperately in need for cxl , are the same ones who have thin corneas often below the threshold which is considered to be safe for CXL treatment However further studies with longer follow up and larger numbers of cases are needed to confirm our findings.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
30
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 12654
- kasrelaini hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 40 years (ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age from 18 to 35years old Mild , moderate and severe keratoconic patients with a corneal thickness from 360-400 µm at the thinnest location .
Exclusion Criteria:
• Previous corneal surgeries such as rings or crosslinking.
- Patients with stromal corneal scar.
- Other ocular pathology such as glaucoma or iridocyclitis.
- Patient with systemic diseases that likely affects wound healing such as insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.
- Patients with collagen vascular diseases, autoimmune or immune deficiency diseases.
- Pregnant or nursing women.
- Patients taking the following medications ; isotretinoin, amiodarone, sumatriptan.
- Other corneal pathology rather than keratoconus
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: patients with progressive keratoconus with thin corneas
patients with progressive keratoconus with thin corneas , with thickness less than 400 micron ,will do conventional cross linking but with putting contact lens over the cornea ( will receive Contact lens assisted corneal cross liking )
|
40 eyes of 30 patients underwent CACXL.
The central 9 mm of corneal epithelium was abraded , Iso-tonic riboflavin 0.1% was applied every 2 minutes for 10 minutes on the debrided cornea.
A disposable soft Contact lens without an ultraviolet filter (Soflens, Bausch & Lomb) was placed in the inferior fornix during soaking of the stroma with riboflavin for 10 minutes.
The contact lens was applied on the corneal surface and the cornea was exposed to ultraviolet-A irradiation at fluence of 3.0 mW/cm2 for 30 minutes The uncorrected (UDVA) and best corrected (BDVA) visual acuity, and maximum (K max) keratometric values, were assessed before, and after 9 months CXL.
Endothelial cell count was assessed before and 3 months after CXL.
Anterior segment OCT was done 1 month after CXL to evaluate the presence and depth of the corneal stromal demarcation line.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
kmax
Time Frame: tomography after 9 months
|
stabilization of the cornea by corneal tomography
|
tomography after 9 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
number of endothelial cell count
Time Frame: 3 months postoperative by specular microscopy
|
number of endothelial cell before and after treatment
|
3 months postoperative by specular microscopy
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
January 1, 2019
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
February 1, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 6, 2020
First Posted (ACTUAL)
August 7, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
August 7, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 6, 2020
Last Verified
August 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- s5-2019
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.