- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04589416
Clinical Evaluation Of Class I Composite Resin Restorations Using Three Different Adhesive Systems
October 9, 2020 updated by: Nazire Nurdan Çakır, Nuh Naci Yazgan University
Erciyes University Clinical Research Ethics Committee
Nowadays, most composite resins require the use of an adhesive material prior to application.
For this purpose, etch & rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) systems have been used for many years.
While many in-vitro studies have been conducted in the literature comparing three adhesive systems, the number of clinical studies is less and inadequate.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 3 different adhesive systems commonly used in clinics on the success of class I composite restorations using the criteria of the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Nowadays, most composite resins require the use of an adhesive material prior to application.
For this purpose, etch & rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) systems have been used for many years.
Compared to SE systems, which are simplified and very easy to use, requiring less technical precision, traditional ER systems are still very popular and preferred by dentists.
However, current researchers indicate that ER systems are more effective on enamel than dentin and that this effect is better than SE systems.
SE systems are approaches in which the acid application and washing step are eliminated clinically and the possibility of making mistakes during the application and manipulation is reduced.
An important advantage of these systems is that demineralization and resin infiltration occurs at the same time.
Clinically, the application times are shorter than traditional systems.
Two-steps SE systems have been used for a long time.
In this system, the need for a separate acidic primer application has needed clinicians reason to search for single-steps bonding agents.
And, in recent years, single-step SE systems also called "all in one", have been developed that include all steps of pickling, primer application, and adhesive agent application.
However, there are studies showing that these systems do not perform as well as two-step SE systems.
While many in-vitro studies have been conducted in the literature comparing three adhesive systems, the number of clinical studies is less and inadequate.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 3 different adhesive systems commonly used in clinics on the success of class I composite restorations using the criteria of the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
78
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years to 18 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 3 Class-I caries lesions
- Good health
- Acceptable level of oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria:
- Did not have four caries lesions at least
- Did not have Class-II caries lesions
- Deep caries reaching the pulp
- The patients are not 18-22 years old
- Bruxism
- Periodontal disease
- Refused to participate
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Single Bond 2
Single Bond 2 is a traditional etch and rinse adhesive system.
It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues.
It was applied to the cavities opened in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
|
It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues.
That is, it is used to bond dental filling materials to dental tissues.
|
|
Active Comparator: Clearfil SE Bond
Clearfil SE bond is traditional two step self-etch adhesive system.
It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues.
It was applied to the cavities opened in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
|
It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues.
That is, it is used to bond dental filling materials to dental tissues.
|
|
Active Comparator: Tri-S Bond
Tri-S bond is traditional one step self-etch adhesive system.
It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues.
It was applied to the cavities opened in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
|
It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues.
That is, it is used to bond dental filling materials to dental tissues.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Evaluation Of Class I Composite Resin Restorations Using Three Different Adhesive Systems with FDI and USPHS criteria
Time Frame: One years
|
FDI; World Dental Federation USPHS; United States Public Health Service.
Two calibrated observers who were blinded to the objective of this study performed the evaluations.
|
One years
|
|
Clinical Evaluation Of Class I Composite Resin Restorations Using Three Different Adhesive Systems with FDI and USPHS criteria
Time Frame: Two years
|
FDI; World Dental Federation USPHS; United States Public Health Service.
Two calibrated observers who were blinded to the objective of this study performed the evaluations.
|
Two years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nazire Nurdan Çakır, Nuh Naci Yazgan University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 9, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
October 19, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 19, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 9, 2020
Last Verified
October 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 5930
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Undecided
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dental Adhesive Materials
-
Ege UniversityActive, not recruitingDental Caries | Dental Adhesive MaterialsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridBEGO GmbHRecruiting
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridIvoclar Vivadent AGCompletedDental Materials
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridGC EuropeActive, not recruiting
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridKuraray Co. LtdActive, not recruiting
-
Hospital San Pietro FatebenefratelliNobel BiocareWithdrawnDental Implants | Dental Impression Materials | Dental Impression TechniquesItaly
-
Hacettepe UniversityActive, not recruitingClass II Dental Caries | Bioactive Dental Restorative MaterialsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Foundation University IslamabadActive, not recruitingNanotechnology, Dental Materials, CompositesPakistan
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill3M ESPETerminatedDental Caries | Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity | Unrepairable Overhanging of Dental Restorative Materials | Poor Aesthetics of Existing Restoration | Secondary Dental Caries Associated With Failed or Defective Dental Restorations | Fractured Dental Restorative Materials Without... and other conditionsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Dental adhesive materials.
-
Lithuanian University of Health SciencesNot yet recruitingDental Implant | Immediate Dental Implant Placement | Bone GraftingLithuania
-
The Campbell Clinic, UKRecruiting
-
Suez Canal UniversityCompletedPartial Edentulism of the Maxilla | Dental Implant Loading | Tooth Loss in the Anterior MaxillaEgypt
-
SmileDent Kft.S.G.S International Kft.Completed
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingPrimary Stability of Knife Threads Dental Implant Versus Double Threads Using Osseodensification Technique
-
University of BernActive, not recruiting
-
Hams Hamed AbdelrahmanCompleted
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruitingDental Implant | Edentulous MouthEgypt
-
University Medical Center GroningenNot yet recruitingDental Implants, Single-tooth | Crown | Immediate Dental Implant PlacementNetherlands
-
Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences UniversityActive, not recruitingPit and Fissure Caries (Disorder) | Pit and Fissure SealantsTurkey (Türkiye)