Clinical Evaluation Of Class I Composite Resin Restorations Using Three Different Adhesive Systems

October 9, 2020 updated by: Nazire Nurdan Çakır, Nuh Naci Yazgan University

Erciyes University Clinical Research Ethics Committee

Nowadays, most composite resins require the use of an adhesive material prior to application. For this purpose, etch & rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) systems have been used for many years. While many in-vitro studies have been conducted in the literature comparing three adhesive systems, the number of clinical studies is less and inadequate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 3 different adhesive systems commonly used in clinics on the success of class I composite restorations using the criteria of the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Nowadays, most composite resins require the use of an adhesive material prior to application. For this purpose, etch & rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) systems have been used for many years. Compared to SE systems, which are simplified and very easy to use, requiring less technical precision, traditional ER systems are still very popular and preferred by dentists. However, current researchers indicate that ER systems are more effective on enamel than dentin and that this effect is better than SE systems. SE systems are approaches in which the acid application and washing step are eliminated clinically and the possibility of making mistakes during the application and manipulation is reduced. An important advantage of these systems is that demineralization and resin infiltration occurs at the same time. Clinically, the application times are shorter than traditional systems. Two-steps SE systems have been used for a long time. In this system, the need for a separate acidic primer application has needed clinicians reason to search for single-steps bonding agents. And, in recent years, single-step SE systems also called "all in one", have been developed that include all steps of pickling, primer application, and adhesive agent application. However, there are studies showing that these systems do not perform as well as two-step SE systems. While many in-vitro studies have been conducted in the literature comparing three adhesive systems, the number of clinical studies is less and inadequate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 3 different adhesive systems commonly used in clinics on the success of class I composite restorations using the criteria of the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 18 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 3 Class-I caries lesions
  • Good health
  • Acceptable level of oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Did not have four caries lesions at least
  • Did not have Class-II caries lesions
  • Deep caries reaching the pulp
  • The patients are not 18-22 years old
  • Bruxism
  • Periodontal disease
  • Refused to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Single Bond 2
Single Bond 2 is a traditional etch and rinse adhesive system. It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues. It was applied to the cavities opened in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues. That is, it is used to bond dental filling materials to dental tissues.
Active Comparator: Clearfil SE Bond
Clearfil SE bond is traditional two step self-etch adhesive system. It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues. It was applied to the cavities opened in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues. That is, it is used to bond dental filling materials to dental tissues.
Active Comparator: Tri-S Bond
Tri-S bond is traditional one step self-etch adhesive system. It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues. It was applied to the cavities opened in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues. That is, it is used to bond dental filling materials to dental tissues.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Evaluation Of Class I Composite Resin Restorations Using Three Different Adhesive Systems with FDI and USPHS criteria
Time Frame: One years
FDI; World Dental Federation USPHS; United States Public Health Service. Two calibrated observers who were blinded to the objective of this study performed the evaluations.
One years
Clinical Evaluation Of Class I Composite Resin Restorations Using Three Different Adhesive Systems with FDI and USPHS criteria
Time Frame: Two years
FDI; World Dental Federation USPHS; United States Public Health Service. Two calibrated observers who were blinded to the objective of this study performed the evaluations.
Two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nazire Nurdan Çakır, Nuh Naci Yazgan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Adhesive Materials

Clinical Trials on Dental adhesive materials.

Subscribe