Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Clinical Evaluation Of Class I Composite Resin Restorations Using Three Different Adhesive Systems

9. oktober 2020 opdateret af: Nazire Nurdan Çakır, Nuh Naci Yazgan University

Erciyes University Clinical Research Ethics Committee

Nowadays, most composite resins require the use of an adhesive material prior to application. For this purpose, etch & rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) systems have been used for many years. While many in-vitro studies have been conducted in the literature comparing three adhesive systems, the number of clinical studies is less and inadequate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 3 different adhesive systems commonly used in clinics on the success of class I composite restorations using the criteria of the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS).

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Nowadays, most composite resins require the use of an adhesive material prior to application. For this purpose, etch & rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) systems have been used for many years. Compared to SE systems, which are simplified and very easy to use, requiring less technical precision, traditional ER systems are still very popular and preferred by dentists. However, current researchers indicate that ER systems are more effective on enamel than dentin and that this effect is better than SE systems. SE systems are approaches in which the acid application and washing step are eliminated clinically and the possibility of making mistakes during the application and manipulation is reduced. An important advantage of these systems is that demineralization and resin infiltration occurs at the same time. Clinically, the application times are shorter than traditional systems. Two-steps SE systems have been used for a long time. In this system, the need for a separate acidic primer application has needed clinicians reason to search for single-steps bonding agents. And, in recent years, single-step SE systems also called "all in one", have been developed that include all steps of pickling, primer application, and adhesive agent application. However, there are studies showing that these systems do not perform as well as two-step SE systems. While many in-vitro studies have been conducted in the literature comparing three adhesive systems, the number of clinical studies is less and inadequate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 3 different adhesive systems commonly used in clinics on the success of class I composite restorations using the criteria of the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS).

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

78

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

14 år til 18 år (Voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 3 Class-I caries lesions
  • Good health
  • Acceptable level of oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Did not have four caries lesions at least
  • Did not have Class-II caries lesions
  • Deep caries reaching the pulp
  • The patients are not 18-22 years old
  • Bruxism
  • Periodontal disease
  • Refused to participate

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Diagnostisk
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Tredobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Single Bond 2
Single Bond 2 is a traditional etch and rinse adhesive system. It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues. It was applied to the cavities opened in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues. That is, it is used to bond dental filling materials to dental tissues.
Aktiv komparator: Clearfil SE Bond
Clearfil SE bond is traditional two step self-etch adhesive system. It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues. It was applied to the cavities opened in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues. That is, it is used to bond dental filling materials to dental tissues.
Aktiv komparator: Tri-S Bond
Tri-S bond is traditional one step self-etch adhesive system. It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues. It was applied to the cavities opened in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
It is used to bond the composite resin to the dental tissues. That is, it is used to bond dental filling materials to dental tissues.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Clinical Evaluation Of Class I Composite Resin Restorations Using Three Different Adhesive Systems with FDI and USPHS criteria
Tidsramme: One years
FDI; World Dental Federation USPHS; United States Public Health Service. Two calibrated observers who were blinded to the objective of this study performed the evaluations.
One years
Clinical Evaluation Of Class I Composite Resin Restorations Using Three Different Adhesive Systems with FDI and USPHS criteria
Tidsramme: Two years
FDI; World Dental Federation USPHS; United States Public Health Service. Two calibrated observers who were blinded to the objective of this study performed the evaluations.
Two years

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Nazire Nurdan Çakır, Nuh Naci Yazgan University

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. februar 2016

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. februar 2018

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. april 2018

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

3. oktober 2020

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

9. oktober 2020

Først opslået (Faktiske)

19. oktober 2020

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

19. oktober 2020

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

9. oktober 2020

Sidst verificeret

1. oktober 2020

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • 5930

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

Uafklaret

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Tandlimematerialer

Kliniske forsøg med Dental adhesive materials.

Abonner