Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY3556050 in Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

October 9, 2023 updated by: Eli Lilly and Company

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate LY3556050 for the Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

This study is being done to test the safety and efficacy of the study drug LY3556050 for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. This trial is part of the chronic pain master protocol (H0P-MC-CPMP) which is a protocol to accelerate the development of new treatments for chronic pain.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ponce, Puerto Rico, 00716
        • Ponce Medical School Foundation Inc.
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00909
        • Latin Clinical Trial Center
    • Arizona
      • Chandler, Arizona, United States, 85224
        • Synexus- Chandler
      • Glendale, Arizona, United States, 85306
        • Synexus Clinical Research - Glendale
      • Tempe, Arizona, United States, 85281
        • Alliance for Multispecialty Research - Clinical Research Consortium
    • California
      • Riverside, California, United States, 92503
        • Artemis Institute for Clinical Research
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • Artemis Institute for Clinical Research
    • Connecticut
      • Hamden, Connecticut, United States, 06517
        • CMR of Greater New Haven
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States, 33180
        • VIN-Julie Schwartzbard
      • Coral Gables, Florida, United States, 33134
        • Clinical Research of South Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33165
        • New Horizon Research Center
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33135
        • Suncoast Research Group
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami Don Suffer Clinical Research Building
      • Ocala, Florida, United States, 34470
        • Renstar Medical Research
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
        • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc - Orlando
      • Pinellas Park, Florida, United States, 33781
        • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.
      • Plantation, Florida, United States, 33317
        • Gold Coast Research
      • The Villages, Florida, United States, 32162
        • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc - Orlando
    • Idaho
      • Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States, 83404
        • Rocky Mountain Clinical Research
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60602
        • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.
      • Skokie, Illinois, United States, 60077
        • NorthShore University Healthsystem
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Joslin Diabetes Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02131
        • Boston Clinical Trials
      • Methuen, Massachusetts, United States, 01844
        • ActivMed Practices and Research
      • Waltham, Massachusetts, United States, 02451
        • MedVadis Research Corporation
    • Michigan
      • Bay City, Michigan, United States, 48706
        • Great Lakes Research Group, Inc.
    • Missouri
      • Saint Peters, Missouri, United States, 63303
        • StudyMetrix Research
      • Springfield, Missouri, United States, 65807
        • Clinvest Research LLC
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45236
        • Synexus - Cincinnati
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45432
        • META Medical Research Institute
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States, 16635
        • Altoona Center for Clinical Research
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
        • FutureSearch Trials
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75251
        • Cedar Health Research
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Synexus - US
    • Washington
      • Bellevue, Washington, United States, 98007
        • Northwest Clinical Research Center
      • Renton, Washington, United States, 98057
        • Rainier Clinical Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a visual analog scale (VAS) pain value ≥40 and <95 during screening.
  • Have a history of daily pain for at least 12 weeks based on participant report or medical history.
  • Have a body mass index <40 kilograms per meter squared (kg/m²) (inclusive).
  • Are willing to maintain a consistent regimen of any ongoing nonpharmacologic pain-relieving therapies (for example, physical therapy) and will not start any new nonpharmacologic pain-relieving therapies during study participation.
  • Are willing to discontinue all pain medications taken for chronic pain conditions for the duration of the study.
  • Have daily symmetrical foot pain secondary to peripheral neuropathy present for at least 6 months and as diagnosed through use of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Part B ≥3 (©University of Michigan).
  • Have a history and current diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.
  • Have stable glycemic control as indicated by a glycated hemoglobin ≤11 at time of screening.
  • Are men, or women able to abide by reproductive and contraceptive requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have had a procedure within the past 6 months intended to produce permanent sensory loss in the target area of interest (for example, ablation techniques).
  • Have surgery planned during the study for any reason, related or not to the disease state under evaluation.
  • Have, in the judgment of the investigator, an acute, serious, or unstable medical condition or a history or presence of any other medical illness that would preclude study participation.
  • Have a substance use disorder as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edition; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association).
  • Have had cancer within 2 years of baseline, except for cutaneous basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma resolved by excision.
  • Are, in the judgment of the investigator, actively suicidal and therefore deemed to be at significant risk for suicide.
  • Have a positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test result at screening.
  • Have an intolerance to acetaminophen or paracetamol or any of its excipients.
  • Have a history of alcohol, illicit drug, analgesic or narcotic use disorder within 2 years prior to screening.
  • Have a current drug-induced neuropathy, for example, due to some types of chemotherapy, or other types of peripheral neuropathy.
  • Have known hereditary motor, sensory or autonomic neuropathies.
  • Have a history within 2 years prior to screening or current evidence of syncope, presyncope, uncontrolled vertigo, or postural dizziness, judged to be clinically significant by the investigator.
  • Have clinically significant active thyroid disease, including Hashimoto's thyroiditis.
  • Are taking metformin therapy. Metformin Exception Limited dosages of metformin are allowed in this study. Additional exclusion criteria for participants taking metformin.

    • Have a history or presence of lactic acidosis.
    • Have a history or presence of severe hepatic disease including cirrhosis.
    • Have uncontrolled or unstable congestive heart failure.
    • Are taking carbonic anhydrase inhibitors if also taking metformin.
    • Have had a change in metformin therapy in the last 12 weeks.
    • Have not maintained a stable dose of glucose-lowering agents other than metformin before randomization.
    • Are pregnant or breastfeeding.
    • Have fibromyalgia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received placebo BID every 12 hours for up to 8 weeks.
given orally
Experimental: 600 Milligram (mg) LY3556050
Participants received 600 mg LY3556050 twice daily (BID) every 12 hours for up to 8 weeks.
given orally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8

The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine.

Posterior mean change from baseline, 95 percent (%) credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Baseline, Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8

VAS was a graphic, single-item scale where participants were asked to describe their pain intensity over the past week, on a scale of 0 to 100: 0=no pain, and 100=worst imaginable pain. Participants completed the VAS by placing a line perpendicular to the VAS line at a point that described their pain intensity.

Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline on the Sleep Scale From the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS Sleep Scale) - Average Hours of Sleep
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8

The MOS Sleep Scale consists of 12 questions addressing the past week. Question 1 asks time to fall asleep and it is reported in 5-point timeframe categories. Question 2 asks average hours of sleep. In the remaining 10 questions participants report how often a sleep symptom or problem was present on a scale ranging from '0=all of the time' to '5=none of the time.' MOS Sleep scale dimension scores range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicating improvement, except for the dimension of sleep adequacy, where higher scores indicate improvement. Here, the average hours of sleep (i.e., Question 2) is reported as the average number of hours slept each night during the past week (range 0 to 24 hours). Higher number of hours slept indicates improvement.

Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Intensity as Measured by NRS
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8

The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their worst pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine.

Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Baseline, Week 8
Total Amount of Rescue Medication Use as Measured by Average Daily Dosage
Time Frame: Week 8
Total amount of rescue medication use as measured by average daily dosage. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Week 8
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Modified (BPI-SFM) Total Pain Interference Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
The BPI-SFM is a numeric rating scale that assesses the severity of pain (severity scale), its impact on daily functioning (Pain Interference scale), and other aspects of pain (for example, location of pain, relief from medications). BPI-SFM pain interference scale has been reported here. Pain interference scale has 7 items, including general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with others, sleep, and enjoyment of life assessed on 10-point scale. All the 7-items are averaged to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 10 where, 0=no interfere to 10=completely interferes and the mean is reported here. Higher score represents worse outcome. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline for Overall Improvement as Measured by Patient's Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8

Patients Global Impression of Change captured the participant's perspective of treatment apart from sub-aspects of the general improvement. This is a numeric scale from 1 to 7: 1=very much better, and 7=very much worse.

Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline on the EuroQuality of Life Five Dimensions (5D) Five Level (5L) Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health State Index (United States Algorithm)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8

The EQ-5D-5L assessed quality of life based on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The participant was asked to 'check the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY,' choosing from 5 options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems) provided under each dimension. The scores in the 5 dimensions were summarized into a health state index score using the United States algorithm. The health state index value is a single value on a scale from less than 0 to 1 (negative values are valued as worse than dead) with higher scores indicating better health: 0=a health state equivalent to death, and 1=perfect health.

Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Baseline, Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), Eli Lilly and Company

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data are available 6 months after the primary publication and approval of the indication studied in the US and EU, whichever is later. Data will be indefinitely available for requesting.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

A research proposal must be approved by an independent review panel and researchers must sign a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe