- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04850664
Computerized Chemosensory-Based Orbitofrontal Cortex (CBOT) for Opioid Use Disorder (CBOT-OUD)
Development and Evaluation of Computerized Chemosensory-Based Orbitofrontal Cortex Training (CBOT) for Opioid Use Disorder
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Evon Medics proposes to evaluate the effectiveness of Computerized Chemosensory-Based Orbitofrontal Cortex Training (CBOT), as an alternative strategy for relapse prevention in patients with Opioid Use (OUD) and other substance use disorders (SUD). This treatment leverages the overlap in brain regions that process smell and mediate decision making. The CBOT is portable and can be used at home. This clinical trial is being conducted to demonstrate its utility for home application by nontreatment seeking and treatment-seeking OUD populations, to engage in long-term, successful opioid recovery.
Key objectives of this project are to: (1) establish the effectiveness of CBOT for improved retention and relapse prevention in a large sample of OUD subjects; (2) establish its effectiveness for acute reduction of withdrawal severity and negative affect early in recovery; and (3) evaluate its safety, user-friendliness and acceptability. Accomplishment of these goals would lead to larger clinical trials for OUD and wider applications of CBOT in other addictive disorders.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Evaristus A Nwulia, MD, MHS
- Phone Number: 410-227-2005
- Email: enwulia@evonmedics.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Maria M Hipolito, MD
- Phone Number: 571-241-2766
- Email: mhipolito@evonmedics.org
Study Locations
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20060
- Recruiting
- Howard University
-
Contact:
- Rai
-
Contact:
- Hipolito
-
Principal Investigator:
- Tanya N Alim, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Mark Johnson, MD
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20002
- Recruiting
- Clinics of Dr. Edwin Chapman @ MHDG
-
Contact:
- Settles-Reaves
-
Contact:
- Adenuga
-
Principal Investigator:
- Edwin Chapman, MD
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20020
- Recruiting
- Family and Medical Counseling Service, Inc
-
Contact:
- Serlin
-
Contact:
- Jackson
-
Principal Investigator:
- Michael Serlin, MD
-
-
Maryland
-
Rockville, Maryland, United States, 20853
- Recruiting
- Maryland Treatment Centers @ Avery Road Treatment Center
-
Contact:
- Wenzel
-
Contact:
- Machineni
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18- 70years
- Diagnosis of current moderate or severe OUD in the past 6 months, including the past one month
- Willing to receive study interventions and buprenorphine during the study
- Do not meet criteria for current moderate or severe use of other substance use disorders (except nicotine use disorder)
- Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety disorders, and Post-traumatic Stress disorders will be included as long as the symptoms are stable, no suicidal ideas or plans and there are no recent changes in treatment of these conditions in the last 6 weeks prior to enrollment
- No intranasal disease
- Willing to participate by signing the informed consent form and
- Have a place to stay when receiving the intervention.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any significant neurologic disease such as stroke, dementia, meningitis, neurosyphilis, cerebral palsy, encephalitis, epilepsy or seizures
- Mental retardation
- Schizophrenia or bipolar disorders
- Experiencing current suicide ideas or plans
- Any unstable medical condition such as uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes, and liver cirrhosis, as determined by site PI
- History of severe traumatic nose injury that affects ability to smell, as determined by site PI
- Allergies or intolerance to aromas from plant essential oils (e.g. orange and lemon)
- Breastfeeding or Pregnancy test positive.
- On parole or probation mandated to receive treatment for OUD.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: QUADRUPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: CBOT + TAU
CBOT consists of 40 cycles of olfactory stimulation and OFC training tasks, lasting ~45 minutes, once daily over 3 months.
Treatment-as-usual (TAU) is standard dosing of buprenorphine (BUP) to a median dose of 24 mg (range 16-32 mg).
|
The CBOT with proprietary odorant molecules is designed to stimulate olfactory neural activity over long periods of time.
It is paired with OFC-dependent cognitive tasks.
Other Names:
|
|
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Sham + TAU
Sham is a CBOT device that uses artificially-scented compressed room air instead of olfactory stimulants and has no OFC cognitive tasks.
Similar to the CBOT, sham will be used daily for 45 minutes.
TAU is standard dosing of buprenorphine (BUP) to a median dose of 24 mg (range 16-32 mg).
|
Sham CBOT device uses artificially scented compressed room air instead of olfactory stimulants and has control cognitive tasks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 2 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
2 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 4 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
4 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
6 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 8 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
8 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 10 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
10 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 12 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
12 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 14 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
14 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 16 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
16 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 18 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
18 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 20 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
20 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 22 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
22 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 24 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
24 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 26 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
26 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 28 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
28 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 30 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
30 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 32 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
32 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 34 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
34 weeks after baseline
|
|
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
Time Frame: 36 weeks after baseline
|
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit. |
36 weeks after baseline
|
|
Change from Screening in Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) at week
Time Frame: Screening to Week 12 Treatment
|
The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms.
It contains 16 symptoms whose intensity the patient rates on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely), and takes less than 10 minutes to complete.
|
Screening to Week 12 Treatment
|
|
Change from Screening in Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) at Week 24
Time Frame: Screening to Week 24
|
The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms.
It contains 16 symptoms whose intensity the patient rates on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely), and takes less than 10 minutes to complete.
|
Screening to Week 24
|
|
Change from Screening in Opioid Craving Scale (OCS) at Week 12 severity rating measures over 1 month
Time Frame: Screening visit to Week 12
|
he Opioid Craving Scale, a modification of the Cocaine Craving Scale was used to measure opioid craving.
|
Screening visit to Week 12
|
|
Change from Screening in Opioid Craving Scale (OCS) at Week 24 severity rating measures over 1 month
Time Frame: Screening visit to Week 24
|
he Opioid Craving Scale, a modification of the Cocaine Craving Scale was used to measure opioid craving.
|
Screening visit to Week 24
|
|
Change from Screening in negative affect severity in the PANAS
Time Frame: Screening visit to Week 12
|
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative affect.
|
Screening visit to Week 12
|
|
Change from Screening in negative affect severity in the PANAS
Time Frame: Screening visit to Week 24
|
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative affect.
|
Screening visit to Week 24
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Opioid Relapse
Time Frame: Screening visit to Week 12
|
Relapse is defined as presence of self-reported repeated (i.e. 2 or more) use after the first two weeks for stabilization of buprenorphine dose, and/or presence of positive urine drug test for opiates.
Ascertainment of opioid relapse is through: (a) Survey question administered 2-weekly, inquiring how days in the past did the subject use heroin, prescription opiates and/or other drugs; the dates of drug use; and the quantity (or dose) of drugs used; and (b) Biochemical verification of drug use, through urine samples will be collected and tested every two weeks.
|
Screening visit to Week 12
|
|
Pre-Intervention changes in SOWS from Screening at Week 2
Time Frame: Screening visit to Week 2
|
The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms.
It contains 16 symptoms whose intensity the patient rates on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely).
|
Screening visit to Week 2
|
|
Post-Intervention changes in SOWS from Week 12 at Week 13
Time Frame: Week 12 to Week 13
|
The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms.
It contains 16 symptoms whose intensity the patient rates on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely).
|
Week 12 to Week 13
|
|
Pre-Intervention changes in OCS from Screening to Week 2
Time Frame: Screening visit to Week 2
|
a modification of the Cocaine Craving Scale was used to measure opioid craving.
|
Screening visit to Week 2
|
|
Post-Intervention changes in OCS from Week 12 to Week 13
Time Frame: Week 12 to Week 13
|
a modification of the Cocaine Craving Scale was used to measure opioid craving.
|
Week 12 to Week 13
|
|
Pre-Intervention changes in PANAS negative affect from Screening visit to Week 2
Time Frame: Screening visit to Week 2
|
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative affect.
|
Screening visit to Week 2
|
|
Post-Intervention changes in PANAS negative affect from Week 12 at Week 13
Time Frame: Week 12 to Week 13
|
The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms.
It contains 16 symptoms whose intensity the patient rates on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely).
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative affect.
|
Week 12 to Week 13
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Evaristus A Nwulia, MD, Evon Medics LLC
- Principal Investigator: Tanya Alim, MD, Howard University
- Principal Investigator: Mark Johnson, MD, Howard University
- Principal Investigator: Michael Serlin, MD, Family and Medical Counseling Service, Inc
- Principal Investigator: Edwin Chapman, MD, Clinics of Dr. Edwin C. Chapman, MD, PC @ MHDG
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Jackson C, Rai N, McLean CK, Hipolito MMS, Hamilton FT, Kapetanovic S, Nwulia EA. Overlapping Risky Decision-Making and Olfactory Processing Ability in HIV-Infected Individuals. Clin Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;3(3):160. doi: 10.4172/2471-2701.1000160. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
- Volkow ND, Fowler JS. Addiction, a disease of compulsion and drive: involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2000 Mar;10(3):318-25. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.3.318.
- Lucantonio F, Takahashi YK, Hoffman AF, Chang CY, Bali-Chaudhary S, Shaham Y, Lupica CR, Schoenbaum G. Orbitofrontal activation restores insight lost after cocaine use. Nat Neurosci. 2014 Aug;17(8):1092-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.3763. Epub 2014 Jul 20. Erratum In: Nat Neurosci. 2014 Sep;17(9):1287.
- Temple DM. Isolation techniques for pharmacologically active substances (animal). Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1969;9:407-18. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.09.040169.002203. No abstract available.
- Hummel T, Rissom K, Reden J, Hahner A, Weidenbecher M, Huttenbrink KB. Effects of olfactory training in patients with olfactory loss. Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):496-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.20101.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CBOTDA049616
- 2R44DA049616-02 (NIH)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.