Effectiveness of Two Skeletally Anchored Force Mechanics for Skeletal Class II Correction in Growing Patients

July 25, 2022 updated by: Yasmine Mohamed Sayed Mahmoud, Alexandria University

Effectiveness of Two Skeletally Anchored Force Mechanics for Correction of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in Growing Patients (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrognathism will be recruited and randomly allocated to three equal groups. first group will be treated by pushing orthopedic force mechanics, second group will be treated by pulling orthopedic force mechanics, and third group will be observed for 9 months to detect the natural growth changes. Skeletal changes will be evaluated and the treatment changes will be compared with the natural growth changes. The study hypothesis is that use of direct bimaxillary miniplate anchorage in conjunction with fixed functional appliance (pushing orthopedic force) or closed coil spring (pulling orthopedic force) will induce statistically significant skeletal mandibular growth in comparison to natural mandibular growth changes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted to address the aim of the study. Thirty-nine growing patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrognathism will be recruited. The sample will be randomly allocated to three equal groups, each including thirteen subjects. Group A will be treated by pushing orthopedic force mechanics using fixed functional appliance (Sabbagh Advanced Repositioning Appliance) anchored to four miniplates (two miniplates inserted in the mandibular symphysis and two infrazygomatic miniplates), and Group B, will be treated by pulling orthopedic force mechanics using Class II springs (CS Class II correction device) anchored to four miniplates (two inserted in the mandibular posterior buccal segment and two inserted in the maxillary anterior segment). In both groups, the appliances will be removed after reaching an edge-to-edge incisor relationship or after 9 months, whichever happens first. A similar third group (Group C) will be observed for 9 months to detect the natural growth changes. Skeletal changes will be evaluated using pretreatment and posttreatment cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT). The treatment changes will be compared with the natural growth changes observed in group C. Other variables will be also examined including, the dentoalveolar effects, the soft tissue profile, and the patient's acceptance to this treatment modality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt, 21526
        • Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronological age ranges from 11 years to 13 years.
  • Skeletal Class II malocclusion with a deficient mandible (SNB ≤ 76°).
  • Horizontal growth pattern (MP/SN ≤ 39°).
  • Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion with at least 5 mm overjet.
  • Mandibular arch crowding less than 5 mm.
  • The patients have to be in the prepubertal growth stage (cervical maturational stage 3 or 4) when applying orthopedic force.
  • Patients with good oral hygiene, and a healthy periodontal condition.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who underwent previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Patients with previous craniofacial surgeries, chronic diseases, syndromes, or growth problems that may affect bone.
  • Any signs or symptoms of para-functional habits or previous history of temporomandibular disorders.
  • Extracted or missing upper permanent teeth (except for third molars).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Miniplates in mandibular symphysis & infrazygomatic
Fixed functional appliance (pushing orthopedic force) in conjunction with direct skeletal anchorage
Active Comparator: Miniplates in external oblique ridge & anterior maxillary region
Coil spring (pulling orthopedic force) in conjunction with direct skeletal anchorage
No Intervention: Growing skeletal Class II subjects

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in the effective mandibular length (Co-Gn)
Time Frame: at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
Correction of the skeletal Class II relation. This outcome will be detected by measuring the mean change in the effective mandibular length (Co-Gn) and position on CBCT images from baseline data (T1) and after appliance removal (T2) and will be compared with the growth changes observed in the control group
at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in maxillary length (Co-A)
Time Frame: at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
The effective maxillary length (Co-A) and position changes will be measured after and chin will be measured.
at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
Changes in the soft tissue angle of convexity
Time Frame: at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
the position of the upper and lower lips, and chin will be measured.
at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
patient acceptance of treatment
Time Frame: After treatment completion about 9 months
The patient's acceptance to the treatment will be evaluated using a visual analog scale questionnaire after removal of the appliances.
After treatment completion about 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Anchored force mechanices

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malocclusion

Clinical Trials on Miniplates in mandibular symphysis & infrazygomatic

3
Subscribe