- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04884022
Effectiveness of Two Skeletally Anchored Force Mechanics for Skeletal Class II Correction in Growing Patients
July 25, 2022 updated by: Yasmine Mohamed Sayed Mahmoud, Alexandria University
Effectiveness of Two Skeletally Anchored Force Mechanics for Correction of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in Growing Patients (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
Patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrognathism will be recruited and randomly allocated to three equal groups.
first group will be treated by pushing orthopedic force mechanics, second group will be treated by pulling orthopedic force mechanics, and third group will be observed for 9 months to detect the natural growth changes.
Skeletal changes will be evaluated and the treatment changes will be compared with the natural growth changes.
The study hypothesis is that use of direct bimaxillary miniplate anchorage in conjunction with fixed functional appliance (pushing orthopedic force) or closed coil spring (pulling orthopedic force) will induce statistically significant skeletal mandibular growth in comparison to natural mandibular growth changes.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
A randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted to address the aim of the study.
Thirty-nine growing patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrognathism will be recruited.
The sample will be randomly allocated to three equal groups, each including thirteen subjects.
Group A will be treated by pushing orthopedic force mechanics using fixed functional appliance (Sabbagh Advanced Repositioning Appliance) anchored to four miniplates (two miniplates inserted in the mandibular symphysis and two infrazygomatic miniplates), and Group B, will be treated by pulling orthopedic force mechanics using Class II springs (CS Class II correction device) anchored to four miniplates (two inserted in the mandibular posterior buccal segment and two inserted in the maxillary anterior segment).
In both groups, the appliances will be removed after reaching an edge-to-edge incisor relationship or after 9 months, whichever happens first.
A similar third group (Group C) will be observed for 9 months to detect the natural growth changes.
Skeletal changes will be evaluated using pretreatment and posttreatment cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT).
The treatment changes will be compared with the natural growth changes observed in group C. Other variables will be also examined including, the dentoalveolar effects, the soft tissue profile, and the patient's acceptance to this treatment modality.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
39
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Alexandria, Egypt, 21526
- Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
11 years to 13 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Chronological age ranges from 11 years to 13 years.
- Skeletal Class II malocclusion with a deficient mandible (SNB ≤ 76°).
- Horizontal growth pattern (MP/SN ≤ 39°).
- Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion with at least 5 mm overjet.
- Mandibular arch crowding less than 5 mm.
- The patients have to be in the prepubertal growth stage (cervical maturational stage 3 or 4) when applying orthopedic force.
- Patients with good oral hygiene, and a healthy periodontal condition.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who underwent previous orthodontic treatment.
- Patients with previous craniofacial surgeries, chronic diseases, syndromes, or growth problems that may affect bone.
- Any signs or symptoms of para-functional habits or previous history of temporomandibular disorders.
- Extracted or missing upper permanent teeth (except for third molars).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Miniplates in mandibular symphysis & infrazygomatic
|
Fixed functional appliance (pushing orthopedic force) in conjunction with direct skeletal anchorage
|
Active Comparator: Miniplates in external oblique ridge & anterior maxillary region
|
Coil spring (pulling orthopedic force) in conjunction with direct skeletal anchorage
|
No Intervention: Growing skeletal Class II subjects
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
change in the effective mandibular length (Co-Gn)
Time Frame: at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
|
Correction of the skeletal Class II relation.
This outcome will be detected by measuring the mean change in the effective mandibular length (Co-Gn) and position on CBCT images from baseline data (T1) and after appliance removal (T2) and will be compared with the growth changes observed in the control group
|
at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
change in maxillary length (Co-A)
Time Frame: at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
|
The effective maxillary length (Co-A) and position changes will be measured after and chin will be measured.
|
at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
|
Changes in the soft tissue angle of convexity
Time Frame: at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
|
the position of the upper and lower lips, and chin will be measured.
|
at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
|
patient acceptance of treatment
Time Frame: After treatment completion about 9 months
|
The patient's acceptance to the treatment will be evaluated using a visual analog scale questionnaire after removal of the appliances.
|
After treatment completion about 9 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 8, 2021
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2022
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 10, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
May 12, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 27, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 25, 2022
Last Verified
July 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Anchored force mechanices
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Malocclusion
-
mahmoud abdelhameed mohamedCompleted
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompleted3D Evaluation of Powerscope Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class 2 Malocclusion (Powerscope app)Class II Malocclusion, Division 1Egypt
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompletedClass II Malocclusion, Division 1Egypt
-
University of BaghdadRecruitingTreating Class II Malocclusion and Bimaxillary ProclinationIraq
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedClass II Malocclusion Division 1Egypt
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownClass II Malocclusion, Division 1
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedClass II Malocclusion, Division 1Syrian Arab Republic
-
Al-Azhar UniversityRecruiting
-
University of AlbertaRecruiting
-
Future University in EgyptCompleted
Clinical Trials on Miniplates in mandibular symphysis & infrazygomatic
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakCompletedClass II Division 1 MalocclusionIndia
-
Wroclaw Medical UniversityCompletedClass III Malocclusion
-
Louqiang ZhangApproved for marketingMandible Fracture | Rigid Internal Fixation | Three-dimensional Finite ElementChina
-
CSI College of Dental Sciences and Research, MaduraiRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownImplant Supported Telescopic Overdenture
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownMandibular Reconstruction Using Free Fibula Flap
-
University of Novi SadActive, not recruitingDental Caries | Inferior Alveolar Nerve | Anesthesia, Dental | Primary TeethSerbia
-
OsteovoxUnknownTemporomandibular DisorderBelgium, France, Italy
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); ITI International Team for Implantology... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingEdentulous Mouth | Tooth-loss | Complete Denture | Complete Lower DentureCanada
-
Healeon Medical IncTerry, Glenn C., M.D.; Ministry of Health, Honduras; Robert W. Alexander, MDEnrolling by invitation