Success Rate of the Miniscrews in the Mandibular Buccal Shelf

March 5, 2022 updated by: Michał Sarul, Wroclaw Medical University

Evidence-based Selection of Orthodontic Miniscrews, Increasing Their Success Rate in the Mandibular Buccal Shelf: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial

Stability of the orthodontic miniscrews placed in the mandible is still considered to bare higher risk of failure compared to other intraoral locations. The aim of our study was to determine the influence of the miniscrew size on their long-term stability, occurrence of oral mucosa inflammation and pain lasting over 48 hours after implantation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • generally healthy Caucasians
  • mild Class III maloclussion that required an absolute anchorage for en-masse distalization in the mandible
  • hypodivergent or normal angle between the maxillary and mandibular planes
  • excellent oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hyperdivergent angle between the maxillary and mandibular planes
  • unfavorable anatomical conditions - e.g. presence of a strong frenulum potentially irritating the miniscrew head during chewing and/or facial movement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: SH2018-10 miniscrew side
We designed our project as a split-mouth study, therefore each patient received both SH2018-10 and SH1514-08 miniscrews, randomly assigned to either left or right side. To do so, our nurse divided both miniscrew types into two halves and assigned symbols appropriate for blinding the intervention. Thus, two combinations of miniscrew sets aroused: 1. SH1514-08R and SH2018-10L or 2. SH1514-08L and SH2018-10R, which were placed separately in opaque packages marked consecutively from "1" to "100" and stored on the tray with dividers. One hundred cards, labeled accordingly, were placed in an envelope, from which the nurse blindly pulled the card just before the miniscrew insertion, this way assigning the set number to every patient. Thus both: the placement side and the screw size were random for clinician.

Each patient received miniscrews in both sizes. The same orthodontist (M.S.) performed all the insertion procedures. Miniscrews were always placed in the mandibular buccal shelf, laterally to the first and second molar interproximal area, with angulation 30 degree to the bone surface, meaning that miniscrew angulation should be approximately the same as the axial inclination of the adjacent molar. Miniscrews were loaded with orthodontic force 2 weeks after the surgery. The investigated factors were:

  • long-term success rate of the miniscrews in the buccal shelf of the mandible (miniscrews were considered long-term stable if they served as an anchorage until completion of mandibular distalization, at least 9 months);
  • peri-implantitis development (enlargement of the gingiva and/or redness and/or tendency to bleed);
  • the patient's report of pain lasting longer than 48 hours after miniscrew insertion.
EXPERIMENTAL: SH1514-08 miniscrew side
We designed our project as a split-mouth study, therefore each patient received both SH2018-10 and SH1514-08 miniscrews, randomly assigned to either left or right side. To do so, our nurse divided both miniscrew types into two halves and assigned symbols appropriate for blinding the intervention. Thus, two combinations of miniscrew sets aroused: 1. SH1514-08R and SH2018-10L or 2. SH1514-08L and SH2018-10R, which were placed separately in opaque packages marked consecutively from "1" to "100" and stored on the tray with dividers. One hundred cards, labeled accordingly, were placed in an envelope, from which the nurse blindly pulled the card just before the miniscrew insertion, this way assigning the set number to every patient. Thus both: the placement side and the screw size were random for clinician.

Each patient received miniscrews in both sizes. The same orthodontist (M.S.) performed all the insertion procedures. Miniscrews were always placed in the mandibular buccal shelf, laterally to the first and second molar interproximal area, with angulation 30 degree to the bone surface, meaning that miniscrew angulation should be approximately the same as the axial inclination of the adjacent molar. Miniscrews were loaded with orthodontic force 2 weeks after the surgery. The investigated factors were:

  • long-term success rate of the miniscrews in the buccal shelf of the mandible (miniscrews were considered long-term stable if they served as an anchorage until completion of mandibular distalization, at least 9 months);
  • peri-implantitis development (enlargement of the gingiva and/or redness and/or tendency to bleed);
  • the patient's report of pain lasting longer than 48 hours after miniscrew insertion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessing the stability of miniscrews
Time Frame: The first evaluation was performed 2 weeks after miniscrew insertion and then every 4-6 weeks (at follow-up visits) throughout the duration of distalization (up to 2 years).
The mobility of the miniscrews was checked clinically with cotton tweezers at each visit. Miniscrews that could not sustain orthodontic force and required replacement because of mobility were considered failures.
The first evaluation was performed 2 weeks after miniscrew insertion and then every 4-6 weeks (at follow-up visits) throughout the duration of distalization (up to 2 years).
Assessing the presence of peri-implantitis
Time Frame: The first evaluation was performed 2 weeks after miniscrew insertion and then every 4-6 weeks (at follow-up visits) throughout the duration of distalization (up to 2 years).
Hypertrophy of the gingiva and/or redness and/or tendency to bleed was noted as the inflammation presence.
The first evaluation was performed 2 weeks after miniscrew insertion and then every 4-6 weeks (at follow-up visits) throughout the duration of distalization (up to 2 years).
Assessing the presence of pain lasting longer than 48 hours after implantation.
Time Frame: two weeks
Two weeks after the miniscrew implantation patients were surveyed upon pain incidence lasting longer than 48 hours.
two weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michał Sarul, Wroclaw Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Class III Malocclusion

Clinical Trials on Orthodontic miniscrew insertion in the mandibular buccal shelf

Subscribe