- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04897061
Caregiver Support and Post-operative Convalescence
Impact of Home Support on Quality of Post-operative Recovery After Major Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10128
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older
- English speaking
- Successfully discharged on the day of surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Discharge to a nursing home, assisted living or rehabilitation facility.
- Dementia or altered mental status that would make recall of recovery process unreliable.
- Inability to access Internet or phone for study participation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Participants undergoing major pelvic organ prolapse surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of Recovery 15 (QOR-15)
Time Frame: Post-operative day 3, 7, 14, and 28
|
Changes in Quality of Recovery 15 (QOR-15) scores based on a priori caregiver characteristics on post-operative days 3, 7, 14 and 28. QOR-15 is a 15 item instrument, full score range from 0 to 150, with higher score indicating better health outcomes. |
Post-operative day 3, 7, 14, and 28
|
|
Change in Post-discharge Surgical Recovery 13 (PSR-13)
Time Frame: Post-operative day 3, 7, 14, and 28
|
Changes in Post-discharge Surgical Recovery 13 (PSR-13) scores based on a priori caregiver characteristics on post-operative days 3, 7, 14 and 28.. The PSR scale is a 13 items instrument, full score range from 0-100, with higher score indicating better recovery. |
Post-operative day 3, 7, 14, and 28
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Healthcare utilization composite score
Time Frame: Post-operative day 3, 7, 14, and 28
|
Changes in a composite score comprised of healthcare utilization of phone calls, unanticipated office visits, and emergency department (ED) visits based on a priori caregiver characteristics on post-operative day 3, 7, 14, and 28.
|
Post-operative day 3, 7, 14, and 28
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ann Tran, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gogenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
- Myles PS. Measuring quality of recovery in perioperative clinical trials. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;31(4):396-401. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000612.
- Chazapis M, Walker EM, Rooms MA, Kamming D, Moonesinghe SR. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):241-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev413.
- Berg K, Idvall E, Nilsson U, Arestedt KF, Unosson M. Psychometric evaluation of the post-discharge surgical recovery scale. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Aug;16(4):794-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01197.x. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
- Kleinbeck SV. Self-reported at-home postoperative recovery. Res Nurs Health. 2000 Dec;23(6):461-72. doi: 10.1002/1098-240X(200012)23:63.0.CO;2-S.
- Lassen PD, Moeller-Larsen H, DE Nully P. Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Nov;91(11):1339-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01535.x. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
- Manohar A, Cheung K, Wu CL, Stierer TS. Burden incurred by patients and their caregivers after outpatient surgery: a prospective observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 May;472(5):1416-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3270-6.
- Wu CL, Berenholtz SM, Pronovost PJ, Fleisher LA. Systematic review and analysis of postdischarge symptoms after outpatient surgery. Anesthesiology. 2002 Apr;96(4):994-1003. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00030. No abstract available.
- Berg K, Kjellgren K, Unosson M, Arestedt K. Postoperative recovery and its association with health-related quality of life among day surgery patients. BMC Nurs. 2012 Nov 13;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-11-24.
- Bouwsma EVA, Anema JR, Vonk Noordegraaf A, de Vet HCW, Huirne JAF. Using patient data to optimize an expert-based guideline on convalescence recommendations after gynecological surgery: a prospective cohort study. BMC Surg. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0317-8.
- Carpenter JS, Heit M, Chen CX, Stewart R, Hamner J, Rand KL. Validating the Postdischarge Surgical Recovery Scale 13 as a Measure of Perceived Postoperative Recovery After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar/Apr;23(2):86-89. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000352.
- Dambi JM, Corten L, Chiwaridzo M, Jack H, Mlambo T, Jelsma J. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the cross-cultural translations and adaptations of the Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale (MSPSS). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 May 2;16(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0912-0.
- Evenson M, Payne D, Nygaard I. Recovery at home after major gynecologic surgery: how do our patients fare? Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;119(4):780-4. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824bb15e.
- Heit M, Carpenter JS, Chen CX, Stewart R, Hamner J, Rand KL. Predictors of Postdischarge Surgical Recovery Following Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Prospective Cohort Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 May;26(5):320-326. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000599.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB 20-01766
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.