Utility of Thermal Imaging in Diagnosis of Cellulitis for Lower Extremity Complaints in the Emergency Department

December 5, 2023 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison
The overall purpose of the study is to determine how providing physicians with a quantitative measure of skin surface temperature influences diagnoses and diagnostic confidence in potential cellulitis cases when added to the standard evaluation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Previous literature estimates the emergency department misdiagnosis rate for cellulitis exceeds 30% due to conditions which can mimic cellulitis (termed pseudocellulitis). These diagnostic errors are associated with an estimated $195 to $515 million dollars in avoidable healthcare spending each year. Objective skin surface temperature measurement, obtained via thermal imaging cameras, has been proposed as a diagnostic adjunct that may reduce diagnostic error in cases of suspected cellulitis. One recent study, identified that the maximum affected skin temperature in cellulitis is significantly higher than in pseudocellulitis, and the temperature gradient between affected and unaffected sites in patients with cellulitis is significantly higher than in patients with pseudocellulitis.

The overall purpose of the study is to determine how providing physicians with a quantifiable measure of skin surface temperature information influences diagnoses and diagnostic confidence in potential cellulitis cases when added to standard physical exam techniques

The Aims of the study are to :

Specific Aim 1: To characterize the temperature difference between affected and unaffected limbs in patients with cellulitis in the emergency department.

Specific Aim 2: To characterize the temperature difference between cases of cellulitis and pseudocellulitis

Specific Aim 3: To determine how quantifying temperature gradients changes diagnostic confidence and accuracy when added to the standard diagnostic evaluation for potential cellulitis.

The investigators will prospectively enroll a maximum of 560 patients with non-traumatic lower extremity dermatologic complaints with visible erythema (potential cellulitis) in the University of Wisconsin Emergency Department. A thermal image and a photograph of the affected and the unaffected limbs will be taken.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

416

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • University of Wisconsin Emergency Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Seeking to include all patients who present to the Emergency Department for a skin related, acute lower extremity complaint and able to provide informed consent.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is presenting to the University of Wisconsin Emergency Department
  • Participant has an acute skin complaint on the lower extremity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is has limited English and Spanish proficiency
  • There was an acute traumatic injury of affected area in last 5 days- includes burns
  • Affected area has a confirmed fracture
  • Participant is pregnant
  • Participant is a prisoner
  • Current complaint is in an area of past surgical procedure (within past 4 weeks)
  • Participant has implant or hardware at site
  • Animal or human bite is cause of complaint
  • Temperature of the leg has been altered in the last one hour
  • Unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
All Participants
All participants will have thermal imaging of their lower extremities. The temperature values will be shared with the attending physician. The physician will be asked questions about their diagnostic confidence before and after seeing the temperature values.
Thermal images of the participants lower extremities will be taken and skin surface temperature values will be provided to the healthcare provider for review during the emergency department encounter.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skin Temperature Difference Between Affected and Unaffected Legs for Participants with Cellulitis
Time Frame: up to one hour
Differences in skin surface temperatures of affected and unaffected areas for those with a final diagnosis of cellulitis.
up to one hour
Skin Temperature Difference Between Participants Diagnosed with Pseudocellulitis and Cellulitis
Time Frame: up to one hour
Determine differences in skin surface temperatures between cases of pseudocellulitis and cellulitis (on the affected legs).
up to one hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Diagnostic Confidence as Measured by Physician Self-Report
Time Frame: up to one hour
Comparison of the change in diagnostic confidence as measured by the attending physician response pre/post thermal imaging review. This was a question developed by the study team and response options include not at all confident, slightly confident, somewhat confident, very confident, extremely confident. No number values are assigned to response values as of yet.
up to one hour
Diagnostic agreement with expert review panel
Time Frame: 6 months
Provider cellulitis diagnostic assignment (yes/no) will be compared to an expert panel to determine the rate of concordance.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Pulia, MD, MS, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 18, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 18, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 18, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-0823 Phase 2
  • A534100 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • SMPH/EMERG MED (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • 1K08HS024342-01A1 (U.S. AHRQ Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cellulitis

Clinical Trials on Thermal Imaging as Diagnostic Adjunct

3
Subscribe