Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Dystonia Associated With Parkinson's Disease and Atypical Parkinsonism

June 24, 2021 updated by: Arnaud Lapostolle, Hospital Avicenne

Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Dystonia Associated With Parkinson's Disease and Atypical Parkinsonism: a Monocentric Cohort Study With Patient Reported Outcome

Dystonia is a disabling symptom affecting both patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonism (AP).

Botulinum toxinum (BoNT), by blocking muscle contraction, is a possible treatment for focal dystonia.

The benefit of BoNT treatment has been proven in some focal dystonia associated with PD or AP.

The investigators aim to give an overview of the efficacy of BoNT in a variety of focal dystonia in a large cohort of parkinsonian patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Seine-Saint-Denis
      • Bobigny, Seine-Saint-Denis, France, 93009
        • Avicenne Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients that have been evaluated in the Neurology department of Avicenne Hospital (academic medical center) between september 1st 2017 and february 11th 2021.

Data will be retrospectively collected within the medical records of those patients.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed Parkinson's disease or Atypical Parkinsonism
  • Age > 18 years
  • Reported dystonia
  • At least 1 injection with Botulinum toxin realized

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients with dystonia secondary to atypical Parkinsonism or Parkinson's disease
Patients with dystonia secondary to idiopathic Parkinson's disease or atypical parkinsonism and treated with BoNT
Patients with atypical Parkinsonism or Parkinson's disease and no dystonia
Patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease or atypical parkinsonism and without reported dystonia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the patient reported efficacy of botulinum toxin treatment between PD and AP patients
Time Frame: Up to twelve months
Evaluation by the patient of the efficacy of the former injection on an improvement scale ranging from 0 to 100% (minimum value : 0, maximum value : 100, higher scores mean a better outcome) systematically made in routine care during follow up appointment
Up to twelve months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the patient reported duration of improvement after treatment by botulinum toxin between PD and AP patients
Time Frame: Up to twelve months
Evaluation by the patient of the duration of the period during which symptoms were improved (in weeks) systematically made in routine care during follow up appointment
Up to twelve months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the patients' age between PD and AP groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Age in years of patients from PD and AP groups
Baseline
Comparison of the sex-ratio between PD and AP groups
Time Frame: Screening
Percentage of female (%) in PD and AP groups
Screening
Comparison of the patients' duration of disease between PD and AP groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Duration of the disease (years since diagnosis of PD or AP) of patients from PD and AP groups
Baseline
Comparison of the patients' severity of the disease between PD and AP groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Severity of the disease in both PD and AP groups measured by the Hoehn and Yahr scale (stage 0 to stage 5, a higher score meaning a more severe disease)
Baseline
Comparison of the patients' daily need in levodopa between PD and AP groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Levodopa equivalent daily dose (in mg, method as described by CL Tomlinson) of patient from PD and AP groups
Baseline
Comparison of the percentage of patients treated with an apomorphine pump between PD and AP groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of patients treated with apomorphine (%) in PD and AP groups
Baseline
Comparison of the percentage of patients treated with deep brain stimulation between PD and AP groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of patients treated with deep brain stimulation (%) in PD and AP groups
Baseline
Comparison of the patients' age between patients presenting with dystonia and patients without reported dystonia
Time Frame: Baseline
Age in years
Baseline
Comparison of the percentage of patients treated with deep brain stimulation between patients presenting with dystonia and patients without reported dystonia
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of patients treated with deep brain stimulation (%) in both groups
Baseline
Comparison of the percentage of patients treated with an apomorphine pump between patients presenting with dystonia and patients without reported dystonia
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of patients treated with apomorphine (%) in both groups
Baseline
Comparison of the patients' daily need in levodopa between patients presenting with dystonia and patients without reported dystonia
Time Frame: Baseline
Levodopa equivalent daily dose (in mg, method as described by CL Tomlinson) of patient from both groups
Baseline
Comparison of the severity of the disease between patients presenting with dystonia and patients without reported dystonia
Time Frame: Baseline
Severity of the disease in both groups measured by the Hoehn and Yahr scale (stage 0 to stage 5, a higher score meaning a more severe disease)
Baseline
Comparison of the patients' duration of disease between patients presenting with dystonia and patients without reported dystonia
Time Frame: Baseline
Duration of the disease (years since diagnosis of AP or PD) of patients
Baseline
Comparison of the sex-ratio between patients presenting with dystonia and patients without reported dystonia
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of female (%)
Baseline
Comparison of the dystonia's characteristics between PD and AP groups : muscle affected
Time Frame: Day 0
Muscle affected by dystonia (described with International Anatomical Terminology)
Day 0
Comparison of the dystonia's characteristics between PD and AP groups : duration of dystonia
Time Frame: Day 0
Duration of the dystonia (years since first report of the dystonia)
Day 0
Comparison of the characteristics of the botulinum toxin injection between PD and AP groups : dose
Time Frame: Day 0
Dose of BoNT used (in mL)
Day 0
Comparison of the characteristics of the botulinum toxin injection between PD and AP groups : type of BoNT
Time Frame: Day 0
Type of botulinum toxin used (onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA or incobotulinumtoxinA)
Day 0
Comparison of the characteristics of the botulinum toxin injection between PD and AP groups : site of injection
Time Frame: Day 0
Site of injection (described with International Anatomical Terminology)
Day 0
Comparison of the characteristics of the botulinum toxin injection between PD and AP groups : number of injections
Time Frame: Day 0
Number of injection performed during injection appointment
Day 0
Comparison of the characteristics of the botulinum toxin injection between PD and AP groups : usage of electromyographic or ultrasound guidance
Time Frame: Day 0
Usage of ultrasound or electromyography to guide BoNT injection
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bertrand Degos, MD,PhD, Hospital AVICENNE

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 11, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 11, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Subscribe