Micro-osteoperforations on the Rate of Canine Retraction

July 8, 2021 updated by: Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

Effect of Micro-osteoperforations on the Rate of Canine Retraction; A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

the study aimed to clinically evaluate the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement, as evaluated by its effect on the rate of canine retraction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Ten adult patients requiring maxillary first premolars' extraction were enrolled in this split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.

Micro-osteoperforations were randomly assigned to one side of the maxillary arch at the canine-premolar region, and the contralateral side served as the control.

Mini-screws were used for anchorage reinforcement, and canine retraction was performed using nickel-titanium closed coil springs, delivering a force of 150 grams per side.

The primary outcome was the measurement of canine retraction rate throughout the study period from digital dental models obtained every 3 weeks.

The secondary outcome was the detection of possible canine tipping during retraction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Alexandria, Egypt
        • Alexandria Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 20 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy systemic condition with no chronic diseases
  • no previous orthodontic treatment
  • adequate oral hygiene
  • have a healthy periodontium
  • signed an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have a chronic disease
  • previous orthodontic treatment
  • poor oral hygiene or periodontal conidition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Micro-osteoperforations
Other: Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs)
MOPs included shallow perforations of the buccal cortical plate surrounding the tooth that requires orthodontic tooth movement, with no flap reflection was performed using a surgical bur using the special calibrated device called PROPEL
Other: Conventional canine retraction
using nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed coil-springs delivering a force of 150 grams per side
Active Comparator: Canine retraction
Other: Conventional canine retraction
using nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed coil-springs delivering a force of 150 grams per side

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of canine retraction
Time Frame: 12 weeks
measurements were recorded from digital dental models every 3 weeks
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurment of canine tipping
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Tipping of the maxillary canine during retraction was also evaluated from digital dental models
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 18, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Canine retraction2020

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malocclusion

Clinical Trials on Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Trinidad & Tobago

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe