Biological Anchorage With Selective Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) in Canine Distalization

Biological Anchorage With Selective Micro-osteroperforations (MOPs) in Canine Distalization

To evaluate the effect of selective micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) on the amount of distal movement of the upper canine, the mesio-distal inclination of the canine and the messiah movement of the upper first molar.

Methods: Clinical trial with Split mouth design in 35 orthodontic patients with bilateral extraction of the upper first premolar, each upper canine will be randomly assigned to the intervention (MOP) or to the control side. Participants will be followed for 3 months and the investigators will take periapical radiographs, cast models and clinical measurements before and after canine retraction. The measurements will be taken by previously calibrated operators. The results are going to be determined and compared between sides, with the corresponding statistical tests and the results are going to be analyzed.

Study Overview

• Status: Terminated
• Conditions: Bone Injury; Teeth Mesial Drift; Orthodontic Pathological Resorption of External Root
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: micro-osteoperforations (MOPs)

Detailed Description

PICO QUESTION: ¿Does the amount of distal orthodontic movement of the upper canine increase in the side with MOPs compared with the side without MOPs? Population: Orthodontic patients with bilateral extraction of the upper first premolar (Split mouth design trial) Intervention: Distal movement of the upper canine with Selective MOPs (distal to canine) in one hemi-arch Comparison: Distal movement of the upper canine without MOPs in the other hemi-arch Outcome: Canine and first molar movements

GENERAL AIM:

- To evaluate the effect of selective micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) on the amount of distal movement of the upper canine, the M-D inclination of the canine and the mesial movement of the upper first molar.

METHODS

OVERVIEW OF DESIGN Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial in split mouth design.

• Randomly assign upper canines in to 2 sides in a split mouth design study: one side to receive intervention (MOPs) and the other side as a control (without MOPs).
• Then follow both sides for three months
• Split mouth design method: The investigators are going to randomly assign to the patients' left or right sides, one side for the intervention and the other side for the control (to eliminate the possibility of selection bias).
• Blinding: It is not possible to blind participants and clinical staff, but the investigators are going to blind the operators who will perform the measurements and the data analysis (single-blinded).

The participants will be with orthodontic fixed appliances (MBT prescription slot 0.022 "x0.028", canine torque 0 °), with working arches 0.019 "x0.025" stainless steel and with bilateral extractions of the first upper premolars for 6 months or more. For this moment the crowding must be resolved and there must be a space of 3 or more millimeters between the canines and second premolars.

The 4 upper incisors will be consolidated with a 0.010 "stainless steel ligature below the arch to prevent opening of anterior spaces.

Observation:

• No transpalatal arch (TPA) will be used in any of the participants
• It is going to place a mini-implant in the palate for reference point before the start of the experiment PLANS FOR RECRUITMENT Patients of the Clinic University (UniCIEO) and Antioquia University POTENCIAL CONFOUNDING VARIABLES
• Age
• Sex
• Systemic diseases not reported by the participant

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 35
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Colombia
  • DC
    • Bogotá, DC, Colombia, 110111
      • UniCIEO
    • Bogotá, DC, Colombia, 110111
      • Universidad de Antioquia

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 14 years to 40 years (Child, Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Class I or Class II malocclusion, division 1 (ANB: 0º-5º) with maxillary canines completely erupted with the need for canine retraction.
• Patients in the working phase with MBT prescription, slot 0.022" who have undergone extractions of bilateral upper premolar with more than three months before the time of upper canine distalization and with open space between the canine and the second premolar greater or equal to 3 mm.
• Age range between 14-40 years.
• Probing depth less than 4 mm in the upper canine

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with systemic disease.
• Medicated patients (prolonged use of antibiotics, phenytoin, cyclosporine, anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, systemic steroids, and calcium channel blockers).
• Pregnancy.
• Poor oral hygiene evident in more than two visits.
• Overjet ≥ 6 mm
• SN-GoGn ≥ 38 °
• Radiographic evidence of moderate to severe bone loss.
• Subjects with active periodontal disease
• Patients who smoke.
• Individuals with inadequately treated endodontic problems in the study area.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No micro-osteoperforations (No MOPs); Canine Distalization without micro-osteoperforations Distalization of the upper canine in working phase with coil spring of 100 gr of force
Experimental: Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs); Canine Distalization with micro-osteoperforations at the start of the distalization Distalization of the upper canine in working phase with coil spring of 100 gr of force	Procedure: micro-osteoperforations (MOPs); three (3) micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) in the cortical and medullar bone, distal to the upper canine. These MOPs will be at the apical, medial and gingival zone of the bone located at the distal surface of the canine in the buccal and in the palatal side. The deep of the MOPs will be at 6 mm. It is going to be done with a PROPEL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Amount of distal movement of the upper canine	Distance from a tangent to a reference point in the palate (third palatal ruga) to the distal side of the upper canine (measured in digital models)	Change from baseline at three months
Inclination of the upper canine, second premolar and first molar	The angle between the long axis of the clinical crown and the reference plane the occlusal plane.(measured in digital models)	Change from baseline at three months
Angulation of the upper canine, second premolar and first molar	The long axis of the posterior buccal surface is going to be measured relative to the occlusal plane (measured in digital models)	Change from baseline at three months
Amount of mesial movement of upper first molar	Distance from a tangent to a reference point in the palate (third palatal ruga) to the mesial side of the upper first molar (measured in digital models)	Change from baseline at three months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Periodontal status	It's going to be measured by clinical exam	Change from baseline at three months
Evaluation of the perception of pain by the patient: VAS	Pain visual analogue scale (AVS) - from 0 to 10 points, Higher values represent more pain perception by the participant	Change from baseline at three months
Number of participants with postoperative inflammation and/or infection	Inflammation, infection by clinical exam	Change from baseline at three months
Number of upper canines with external root resorption	Periapical radiograph	Change from baseline at three months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Fundación Universitaria CIEO
• Collaborators: Universidad de Antioquia

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): December 2, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): March 9, 2021
• Study Completion (Actual): March 9, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 6, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 14, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): November 15, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 12, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 9, 2021
• Last Verified: March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Stomatognathic Diseases; Periodontal Diseases; Mouth Diseases; Tooth Diseases; Tooth Migration; Tooth Resorption; Mesial Movement of Teeth
• Other Study ID Numbers: 042

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No
• IPD Plan Description: Individual participant data is going to be share only for statistical analysis

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No