Percutaneous Peristyloid Glossopharyngeal Block After Tonsillectomy

September 25, 2022 updated by: Abdelrhman Alshawadfy, Suez Canal University

Comparison Between Two Techniques of Percutaneous Peristyloid Glossopharyngeal Block as an Analgesic Tool After Tonsillectomy

Adenotonsillectomy surgery in paediatrics is commonly managed as an ambulatory surgery. This may be attributed to the use of the electro-dissection surgical technique that decreases the incidence of immediate postoperative haemorrhage. However, the use of the electro-cautery technique increases postoperative inflammation.

This study aimed to compare the glossopharyngeal nerve block using the blind technique with the use of the ultrasound guidance Primary: FLACC score in the two groups 0,2,4,6 h after surgery at rest and with swallowing Secondary: need to analgesics, the difficulty of the technique, time consumption, recovery time, surgeon satisfaction, parents satisfaction, staff nurse satisfaction, anaesthetist self-confidence

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

INTRODUCTION Adenotonsillectomy surgery in paediatrics is commonly managed as an ambulatory surgery. This may be attributed to the use of the electro-dissection surgical technique that decreases the incidence of immediate postoperative haemorrhage. However, the use of the electro-cautery technique increases postoperative inflammation.

Sensory fibres of the glossopharyngeal nerve supply the tonsillar and peri-tonsillar areas. Thus, a bilateral glossopharyngeal nerve block may alleviate post-tonsillectomy pain and improve postoperative analgesia.

This is a Prospective randomized controlled clinical study, to compare two different technique used to block the glossopharyngeal nerve.

AIM OF WORK To improve post tonsillectomy pain control in children Anaesthesia, postoperative analgesia Paediatrics 3-7 years Tonsillectomy NOT adenotonsillectomy Postoperative control of pain OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare the glossopharyngeal nerve block using the blind technique with the use of the ultrasound guidance Primary: FLACC score in the two groups 0,2,4,6 h after surgery at rest and with swallowing Secondary: need to analgesics, the difficulty of the technique, time consumption, recovery time, surgeon satisfaction, parents satisfaction, staff nurse satisfaction, anaesthetist self-confidence METHODOLOGY 54 ASA I children allocated randomly into two groups: Group BL: Blind percutaneous peristyloid injection Group US: ultrasound-guided percutaneous peristyloid glossopharyngeal nerve block 54 children aged 3 to 7 years undergoing adenotonsillectomy without adenoidectomy were randomized to receive either local blind percutaneous peistyloid glossopharyngeal nerve block (n=27) or the use of ultrasound guidance for the same block (n=27). The pain was assessed by the FLACC scale or Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale, need for analgesics, and acceptance of diet during the postoperative period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ismailia, Egypt
        • Suez Canal University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 7 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • children aged 3-7 years
  • scheduled for tonsillectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • younger or elder children
  • associated adenoidectomy
  • history of allergy to local anaesthetics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: blind glossopharyngeal nerve block
patients will have the glossopharyngeal nerve block with the blind technique
glossopharyngeal nerve block either blindly or using the ultrasonic technique
Active Comparator: ultrasonic glossopharyngeal nerve block
patients will have the glossopharyngeal nerve block using the ultrasonic technique
glossopharyngeal nerve block either blindly or using the ultrasonic technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) score
Time Frame: Immediately postoperatively considered as 0 hour, then at 2 hours, again at 4 hours, and lastly at 6 hours after surgery all measures will be both at rest and with swallowing
FLACC is a behavioural pain assessment scale used for nonverbal or preverbal patients who cannot self-report their pain level. Pain is assessed through observation of 5 categories including the face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability. The scale ranges from 0 to 10 where 0 records for no pain and 10 records for the worst pain
Immediately postoperatively considered as 0 hour, then at 2 hours, again at 4 hours, and lastly at 6 hours after surgery all measures will be both at rest and with swallowing

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
need for postoperative analgesia
Time Frame: immediately postoperatively considered as 0 hour, then at 2 hours, again at 4 hours, and lastly at 6 hours after surgery
need to analgesics in doses and frequencies both at rest and with swallowing.
immediately postoperatively considered as 0 hour, then at 2 hours, again at 4 hours, and lastly at 6 hours after surgery
difficulty of the technique
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
prescribed by the operator either easy or difficult
immediately after the intervention
time consumption
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
from the start of preparation of the procedure, till the end of the block time in minutes
immediately after the intervention
recovery time
Time Frame: immediately before shifting the patient to recovery room
from the end of the surgery, till shifting the patient from operation table to recovery bed time in minutes
immediately before shifting the patient to recovery room
surgeon satisfaction assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: immediately after discharging the patient to home
described by the surgeon him self on a scale ranging from very satisfactory to unsatisfactory
immediately after discharging the patient to home
anesthetists self-confidence
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
described as yes or no
immediately after the intervention
parents satisfaction
Time Frame: immediately before discharging the patient to home
described by the parents on a scale ranging from very satisfactory to unsatisfactory
immediately before discharging the patient to home
staff nurse satisfaction
Time Frame: immediately before shifting the patient from the recovery room to the day care unite by recovery nurse, and immediately after discharging the patient to home by daycare unite nurse
described by the recovery nurse and daycare unite nurse on a scale ranging from very satisfactory to unsatisfactory
immediately before shifting the patient from the recovery room to the day care unite by recovery nurse, and immediately after discharging the patient to home by daycare unite nurse

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

not yet decided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on glossopharyngeal nerve block

Subscribe