Brain Function and EEG (DEG)

January 23, 2024 updated by: University of Chicago

Drug Effects on EEG

In this project, we will examine effects of MA on reward function using electroencephalograms (EEG), which will complement our ongoing study with MA and fMRI. We will determine how MA alters reward-related neural activity and how this is related to its subjective rewarding effects. The effects of MA on reward function will be examined using both reward-task-related activation and resting state activity. We will examine the effects of MA on ratings of drug liking and euphoria, as well as on EEG measures sensitivity to reward. Healthy young adults will undergo three EEG sessions with placebo and MA (10 and 20 mg), while performing the Monetary Incentive Delay task and the Stop Task, as a measure of inhibition. We will examine correlations between the neural responses and subjective responses to MA.

Our central hypotheses are 1) that MA will increase feelings of alertness and well-being, and 2) that MA will increase neural responses to anticipation and receipt of reward, and 3) that the effects of MA on mood will be correlated with its effects on neural responses to reward.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

BMI between 19 and 26 Less than 4 alcohol or caffeinated beverages a day.

Exclusion Criteria:

High blood pressure

Any medical condition requiring regular medication Individuals with a current (within the last year) DSM-IV Axis 1 diagnosis Individuals with a history of dependence on stimulant drugs Women who are pregnant or trying to become pregnant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Placebo Then Methamphetamine
Participants first receive placebo at their first session in the laboratory. Then will return to the laboratory 72 hours later and will receive 20 mg methamphetamine.
Participants will be given 20 mg of Methamphetamine.
Participants will be given a placebo capsule that will only contain lactose.
Experimental: Methamphetamine Then Placebo
Participants first receive 20 mg methamphetamine at their first session in the laboratory Then will return to the laboratory 72 hours later and will receive placebo.
Participants will be given 20 mg of Methamphetamine.
Participants will be given a placebo capsule that will only contain lactose.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in SUbjective Effects as Assessed by Score on "Feel Drug", "Feel High", "Like Drug", and "Want More" Sub-scales of Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ).
Time Frame: Time Frame: Day 1(baseline), 3
Participants will complete The Drug Effects Questionnaire during the initial baseline session to determine their subjective stimulant profile. The Dug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ) is a visual analog scale questionnaire that assesses the extent to which subjects experience four subjective states: "Feel Drug", "Feel High", "Like Drug", and "Want More". All sub-scales are scored on a visual analogue scale (Scroll bar on computer screen) ranging from 0-100. 100 represents the highest score for that subjective state, and the higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Time Frame: Day 1(baseline), 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Harriet de Wit, University of Chicago

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Methamphetamine

Subscribe