Time Needed to Perform Intermittent Catheterization in Adults With Spinal Cord Injuries

August 4, 2021 updated by: Andrei Krassioukov

The Burden of Intermittent Catheterization in Adult Individuals With Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Following Spinal Cord Injury - Part 2

This study investigates the burden of intermittent catheterization in adult individuals with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) following spinal cord injury (SCI).

Individuals will be recruited to compare two types of catheters. Each participant will use a non-hydrophilic catheter at one time point and a hydrophilic catheter at a different time point to perform intermittent catheterization. The order that participants use either a non-hydrophilic or a hydrophilic catheter will be determined randomly. The purpose of the study is to provide evidence for time spent on bladder management (performing intermittent catheterization) as well as consumer satisfaction on using both catheters.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

NLUTD and its management is of high priority for individuals living with SCI as it significantly reduces quality of life and interferes with their daily life. Intermittent catheterization in individuals with NLUTD following SCI is considered the preferred method of bladder emptying, i.e. gold standard.

Although intermittent catheterization offers reduced risk for urinary tract infection (UTI) compared to other methods of bladder emptying, the burden of complications including UTI and their management remains high. Another important aspect for individuals following SCI is improving quality of life. Since bladder management is a time-consuming and demanding task, reducing the time needed for intermittent catheterization and improving comfort during this procedure, i.e. convenience and ease of handling could significantly benefit quality of life for individuals living with SCI. Therefore, the investigators intend to compare hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic catheters; time needed to perform intermittent catheterization and the convenience/ease of handling in this present study.

This is a prospective, randomized controlled crossover trial investigating the burden of intermittent catheterization in adult individuals with NLUTD following SCI.

Brief outline of study:

Visit 1 - Screening assessment to determine study eligibility. After providing informed consent, individuals will be assigned a unique study number and the following information will be collected:

  • Inclusion / exclusion criteria
  • Medical history including concomitant medication and procedures
  • Demographic information

The following procedures will be conducted:

  • Classification of SCI, i.e. neurological level and completeness using American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS)
  • Participants will be randomized, i.e. either to start with the hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic catheter second or vice versa.

Visit 2 - Participants will perform intermittent catheterization to obtain a urine sample for culture (women will be administered a pregnancy test).

Visit 3 - Assessment of time to perform intermittent catheterization using catheter A or B (depending on randomization, e.g., starting with catheter A) followed by feedback on convenience and ease of handling using a satisfaction survey.

Visit 4 - Assessment of time to perform intermittent catheterization using catheter A or B (depending on randomization, e.g., now using catheter B) followed by feedback on convenience and ease of handling using a satisfaction survey.

Visit 5 - Individuals will receive a phone call and be asked to provide information regarding any changes in health and specifically bladder health.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1M9
        • University of British Columbia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female or male
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Presenting with a chronic SCI (i.e. greater than one year post-injury) at any level and with any severity (i.e. American Spinal Injury Association scale grade A to E )
  • Hand function sufficient to perform intermittent catheterization for management of urinary bladder drainage
  • Willing and able to comply with all clinic visits and study-related procedures
  • Must provide informed consent and be able to understand and complete study-related instructions (must be able to understand and speak English)
  • Women must not be pregnant
  • Must not have any urinary diversion procedure, such as bladder augmentation, cystectomy, neo bladder, pouch reservoir, ileal conduit, Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy or similar

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In addition to not fulfilling the inclusion criteria:

    • Presence of severe acute medical issue that in the investigator's judgement would adversely affect the individual's participation in the study
    • Individuals who do not perform intermittent catheterization
    • Individuals who are members of the investigational team and immediate family

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intermittent catheterization starting with a hydrophilic catheter (HPC)
The investigators measure the time taken to perform intermittent catheterization using a 13 step pre-determined intermittent catheterization protocol using a hydrophilic catheter i.e. SpeediCath ® (Coloplast A/S, Humlebæk, Denmark)
The investigators measure the time taken to perform intermittent catheterization using a 13 step pre-determined intermittent catheterization protocol using a hydrophilic catheter
Other Names:
  • Intermittent catheterization using a hydrophilic catheter (HPC)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Intermittent catheterization starting with a non-hydrophilic catheter (non-HPC)
The investigators measure the time taken to perform intermittent catheterization using a 13 step pre-determined intermittent catheterization protocol using a non-hydrophilic catheter i.e. Self-Cath ® (Coloplast A/S, Humlebæk, Denmark); Lubrication jelly (MUKO ®, 3.5g package, Cardinal Health Canada Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada) was provided
The investigators measure the time taken to perform intermittent catheterization using a 13 step pre-determined intermittent catheterization protocol using a non-hydrophilic catheter; Lubrication jelly (MUKO ®, 3.5g package, Cardinal Health Canada Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada) was provided
Other Names:
  • Intermittent catheterization using a non-hydrophilic catheter (non-HPC)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in time needed to perform intermittent catheterization between two types of catheters
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of two weeks
A measure of time (seconds) taken to perform intermittent catheterization using a 13 step pre-determined intermittent catheterization protocol where the first catheter will be different from the later catheter (i.e. hydrophilic vs. non-hydrophilic catheter).
Through study completion, an average of two weeks
Difference in convenience to perform intermittent catheterization between two types of catheters
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of two weeks
To assess the difference in convenience (ease of handling) for two catheters, i.e. using a hydrophilic vs. a non-hydrophilic catheter, as determined by using a survey.
Through study completion, an average of two weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, FRCPC, University of British Columbia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 10, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe