Life Improving Factors After a Hip Fracture (LIFF)

February 1, 2023 updated by: Hugo Wijnen, Wageningen University
The primary objective of the proposed research is to investigate the association between protein intake and nutritional status with bone health and physical functioning in older hip fracture patients. In addition, it will be investigated which patient characteristics and modifiable factors can predict mobility, clinical frailty, living situation and mortality. This study will be a 3-month prospective cohort study in adults aged 70 years and older with an acute hip fracture. This study will lead to knowledge about how protein intake and nutritional status in combination with patient characteristics can predict the degree of recovery (bone health and physical functioning) 3 months after the hip fracture. Knowledge on factors related to recovery can contribute to an improved and shorter rehabilitation in the future, which results in a reduction of health care costs.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Only half of the patients with an acute hip fracture regain their pre-fracture functional level and 24% dies within the following year. Identifying and targeting modifiable risk factors for optimal recovery after a hip fracture is therefore essential. These factors include protein intake and nutritional status, which may affect markers of bone health and physical functioning and thereby influence recovery.

Measurements will be performed at baseline (within 5 days after the hip surgery) and after 3 months during an outpatient clinic visit for the evaluation of the hip fracture surgery. A total of 95 older adults (aged 70 years or older) recovering from an acute hip fracture will be recruited from Rijnstate hospital.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

95

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Older adults aged 70 years or older recovering from an acute hip fracture

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 70 years
  • Community-dwelling
  • Proximal femur fracture: femoral neck fracture/ pertrochanteric fracture, subtrochanteric fracture
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Pre-fracture Clinical Frailty Scale 3-6

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pathological fracture or periprosthetic fracture
  • Current participation in scientific research that interferes with the proposed study
  • History of dementia
  • No permission to request information from the general practitioner/ treating specialist(s) about medical history, medication use, liver and kidney values, and details about the broken hip

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Protein intake
Time Frame: Baseline
Dietary protein intake will be recorded using a protein screener which gives an indication of protein intake in g/d. Based on the past 4 weeks.
Baseline
Protein intake
Time Frame: Three months
Dietary protein intake will be recorded using a protein screener which gives an indication of protein intake in g/d. Based on the past 4 weeks.
Three months
Nutritional status
Time Frame: Baseline
Using the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form. Subjects will be classified as having a normal nutritional status (12-14 points), having a risk of malnutrition (8-11 points), or being undernourished (0-7 points).
Baseline
Nutritional status
Time Frame: Three months
Using the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form. Subjects will be classified as having a normal nutritional status (12-14 points), having a risk of malnutrition (8-11 points), or being undernourished (0-7 points).
Three months
Procollagen type 1 N propeptide
Time Frame: Baseline
Bone turnover marker, in serum
Baseline
Procollagen type 1 N propeptide
Time Frame: Three months
Bone turnover marker, in serum
Three months
C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen
Time Frame: Baseline
Bone turnover marker
Baseline
C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen
Time Frame: Three months
Bone turnover marker
Three months
Calcaneus quantitative ultrasound parameters
Time Frame: Baseline
Ultrasound of the calcaneus which gives an indication of the bone density. Device yields the following two parameters: speed of sound (SOS) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), which can be combined to get the Stiffness Index (SI).
Baseline
Calcaneus quantitative ultrasound parameters
Time Frame: Three months
Ultrasound of the calcaneus which gives an indication of the bone density. Device yields the following two parameters: speed of sound (SOS) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), which can be combined to get the Stiffness Index (SI).
Three months
Insulin-like growth factor 1
Time Frame: Baseline
In serum
Baseline
Insulin-like growth factor 1
Time Frame: Three months
In serum
Three months
Parathyroid hormone levels
Time Frame: Baseline
In serum
Baseline
Parathyroid hormone levels
Time Frame: Three months
In serum
Three months
Handgrip strength
Time Frame: Baseline
Using the Martin vigorimeter
Baseline
Handgrip strength
Time Frame: Three months
Using the Martin vigorimeter
Three months
Grip work
Time Frame: Baseline
Using the Martin vigorimeter
Baseline
Grip work
Time Frame: Three months
Using the Martin vigorimeter
Three months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Appendicular skeletal muscle mass
Time Frame: Baseline
Using bioimpedance spectroscopy
Baseline
Appendicular skeletal muscle mass
Time Frame: Three months
Using bioimpedance spectroscopy
Three months
Mobility
Time Frame: Baseline
Pre-fracture mobility will be assessed with the pre-fracture mobility scale (PMS). The PMS classifies the patient as independent walker, walk with rollator, in a wheelchair or bedridden.
Baseline
Mobility
Time Frame: Three months
Mobility at 3 months will be assessed with the Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC). The FAC is scaled from 0 to 5, in which zero means that patient cannot walk or need at least two persons to help and five means independent walker.
Three months
Frailty
Time Frame: Baseline
Frailty will be assessed with the Clinical Frailty Scale. This scale is graded from 1 to 9 in which level 1 represents 'very fit' and level 9 'terminally ill'.
Baseline
Frailty
Time Frame: Three months
Frailty will be assessed with the Clinical Frailty Scale. This scale is graded from 1 to 9 in which level 1 represents 'very fit' and level 9 'terminally ill'.
Three months
Bodyweight
Time Frame: Baseline
Bodyweight (kg) will be measured with a calibrated sitting weighing scale.
Baseline
Bodyweight
Time Frame: Three months
Bodyweight (kg) will be measured with a calibrated sitting weighing scale.
Three months
Barthel Index
Time Frame: Baseline
This questionnaire determines the degree of (physical or verbal) help a person needs to perform general daily activities. It is graded from 0 (person is completely dependent on others) to 20 (person is completely independent).
Baseline
Barthel Index
Time Frame: Three months
This questionnaire determines the degree of (physical or verbal) help a person needs to perform general daily activities. It is graded from 0 (person is completely dependent on others) to 20 (person is completely independent).
Three months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 6, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 29, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-1814

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe