Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Acquired Refractory Aplastic Anemia (HAPLO-EMPTY)

November 8, 2021 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Acquired Refractory Aplastic Anemia: a Nationwide Phase II Study

Outcomes for patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who are refractory to first-line immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and who lack a matched unrelated donor (MUD) remain poor. Recently, the use of eltrombopag (ELT) has shown blood count improvements in 40% of these patients. However, most refractory patients do not respond to ELT or other second-line treatment and are therefore exposed to life-threatening infections, and bleeding. During the past 2 decades, there has been a significant decrease in infection-related mortality in patients with SAA unresponsive to initial IST but clonal evolution including paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) still occur in the long-term with a grim prognosis. Overall, the overall survival of such patients with acquired refractory SAA to ELT is about 60-70% at 2 years.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using alternative donor sources (i.e., mismatched unrelated donors, cord blood (CBT), and haplo-identical family donors) may be curative in patients with refractory SAA, despite carrying much higher rates of complications than in transplantations from matched related or unrelated donors. Recently, our group showed that CBT is a valuable curative option for young adults with refractory SAA. However, not all patients have available CB and CBT treatment related mortality is high in adult patients. Haploidentical (haplo) related donor Stem Cell Transplantation (haplo-SCT) have improved dramatically outcomes using T-cell replete grafts with administration of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). Preliminary results in a little number of patients with refractory SAA at Kings college (London, UK) and John Hopkins (Baltimore, USA) seem promising. The investigators retrospectively analyzed data from 36 patients (median age 42 years) transplanted between 2010 and 2017 in Europe on behalf of the SAA working party of the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation group. The 1-year overall survival was about 80% suggesting that this approach might be a valid option in this particular poor clinical situation.

The main objective of this study is to demonstrate a benefit in term of the 2-year overall survival rate from 60% (historical rates in patients with acquired refractory idiopathic aplastic anemia) up to 80% using haplo-SCT with PTCy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

31

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 35 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged from 3 to 35 years old
  • Suffering from refractory acquired idiopathic aplastic anemia (at least one course of immunosuppression with anti-thymocyte globulin)
  • Absence of geno-identical donor or 10/10 matched donor
  • With identification of a haploidentical donor (brother, sister, parents, adult children or cousin)
  • Absence of donor specific antibody detected in the patient with a MFI ≥ 1500 (antibodies directed towards the distinct haplotype between donor and recipient)
  • With usual criteria for HSCT :

    • ECOG(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) ≤ 2
    • No severe and uncontrolled infection
    • Cardiac function compatible with high dose of cyclophosphamide
  • Adequate organ function: ASAT(aspartate transaminase) and ALAT (alanine aminotransferase) ≤ 2.5 N (the norm), total bilirubin ≤ 2N, creatinine < 150 μmol/L
  • With health insurance coverage
  • Contraception methods must be prescribed during all the duration of the research. Women and men of childbearing age must use contraceptive methods within 12 months and 6 months after the last dose of cyclophosphamide, respectively.
  • Having signed a written informed consent (2 parents for patients aged less than 18)

Exclusion Criteria :

  • With no morphologic evidence of clonal evolution (patients with isolated bone marrow cytogenetic abnormalities are also eligible).
  • With uncontrolled infection
  • With seropositivity for HIV or HTLV-1 (Human T cell Leukemia) or active hepatitis B or C defined by a positive PCR (polymerase chain reaction) HBV (hepatitis B virus) or HCV (hepatitis C virus) and associated hepatic cytolysis
  • Cancer in the last 5 years (except basal cell carcinoma of the skin or "in situ" carcinoma of the cervix)
  • Pregnant (βHCG positive) or breast-feeding.
  • Who received attenuated vaccine within 2 months before transplantation
  • Uncontrolled coronary insufficiency, recent myocardial infarction <6 month, current manifestations of heart failure, uncontrolled cardiac rhythm disorders, ventricular ejection fraction <50%
  • With heart failure according to NYHA (New York Heart Association) (II or more)
  • Preexisting acute hemorrhagic cystitis
  • Renal failure with creatinine clearance <30ml / min
  • With urinary tract obstruction
  • With contraindications to treatments used during the research
  • Who have any debilitating medical or psychiatric illness, which preclude understanding the inform consent as well as optimal treatment and follow-up
  • Under tutorship or curatorship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
  1. Conditioning regimen Fludarabine (30mg/m2/day i.v: day -6 to day -2), pre-transplant cyclophosphamide (14.5 mg/kg/day i.v: day -6 and day -5), and Total Body Irradiation (2 Gray on day-1)
  2. Stem cell source Bone Marrow
  3. GVHD Prophylaxis Rabbit ATG dosed at 0.5 mg/kg on day -9 and 2 mg/kg on days -8 and -7, Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/Kg/day at D+3 and D+4, Tacrolimus (residual 8-12 microg/L) and mycophenolate (MMF) from D+5. In absence of GvHD, MMF will be stopped at D35 and tacrolimus at day 365.
  4. Prevention of EBV reactivation Rituximab 150mg/m2 intravenously at Day+5 post HSCT, Each infusion of Rituximab will be preceded by administration of anti-pyretic and an antihistaminic, e.g. paracetamol and diphenhydramine.
  1. Conditioning regimen Fludarabine (30mg/m2/day i.v: day -6 to day -2), pre-transplant cyclophosphamide (14.5 mg/kg/day i.v: day -6 and day -5), and Total Body Irradiation (2 Gray on day-1)
  2. Stem cell source Bone Marrow
  3. GVHD Prophylaxis Rabbit ATG dosed at 0.5 mg/kg on day -9 and 2 mg/kg on days -8 and -7, Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/Kg/day at D+3 and D+4, Tacrolimus (residual 8-12 microg/L) and mycophenolate (MMF) from D+5. In absence of GvHD, MMF will be stopped at D35 and tacrolimus at day 365.
  4. Prevention of EBV reactivation Rituximab 150mg/m2 intravenously at Day+5 post HSCT, Each infusion of Rituximab will be preceded by administration of anti-pyretic and an antihistaminic, e.g. paracetamol and diphenhydramine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall survival rate
Time Frame: at 2 years
at 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Graft failure incidence
Time Frame: at 2 years
at 2 years
Neutrophils engraftment
Time Frame: at day 100
3 consecutive days with neutrophiles >0.5 G/L
at day 100
Platelets engraftment
Time Frame: at day 100
7 consecutive days with platelets >20 G/L
at day 100
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 1 month
at 1 month
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 2 months
at 2 months
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Absolute numbers of platelets
Time Frame: at 1 month
at 1 month
Absolute numbers of platelets
Time Frame: at 2 months
at 2 months
Absolute numbers of platelets
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Absolute numbers of platelets
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Absolute numbers of platelets
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Absolute numbers of platelets
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Incidence of use of growth factors for poor hematopoietic reconstitution
Time Frame: up to one year
up to one year
Acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) incidence
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) incidence
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Relapse incidence
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Relapse incidence
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Progression free survival
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Incidence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Severe infections (CTAE grade 3-4)
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Severe infections (CTAE grade 3-4)
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Severe infections (CTAE grade 3-4)
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Severe infections (CTAE grade 3-4)
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Non-relapse mortality
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Incidence of cardiac toxicities
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Quality of life questionnaire for adults
Time Frame: at 3 months
Quality of life will be assessed for adult using "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) " EORTC QLQ-C30-V3 questionnaire.The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
at 3 months
Quality of life questionnaire for minors
Time Frame: at 3 months
Quality of life will be assessed for minor using The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) The 36-item PedsQL™ Family Impact Module is a parent-report instrument designed to assess the impact of pediatric chronic health conditions on parents and the family. It includes 6 subscales measuring parents' self-reported functioning. The scale has five Likert response options, 'never', 'almost never', 'sometimes', 'often' and 'almost always' (corresponding to scores of 100, 75, 50, 25 and 0). Higher scores indicate better functioning.
at 3 months
Quality of life questionnaire for adults
Time Frame: at 6 months
Quality of life will be assessed for adult using "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" EORTC QLQ-C30-V3 questionnaire.The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
at 6 months
Quality of life questionnaire for minors
Time Frame: at 6 months
Quality of life will be assessed for minor using The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) The 36-item PedsQL™ Family Impact Module is a parent-report instrument designed to assess the impact of pediatric chronic health conditions on parents and the family. It includes 6 subscales measuring parents' self-reported functioning. The scale has five Likert response options, 'never', 'almost never', 'sometimes', 'often' and 'almost always' (corresponding to scores of 100, 75, 50, 25 and 0). Higher scores indicate better functioning.
at 6 months
Quality of life questionnaire for adults
Time Frame: at 12 months
Quality of life will be assessed for adults using "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" EORTC QLQ-C30-V3 questionnaire.The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
at 12 months
Quality of life questionnaire for minors
Time Frame: at 12 months
Quality of life will be assessed for minor using The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) The 36-item PedsQL™ Family Impact Module is a parent-report instrument designed to assess the impact of pediatric chronic health conditions on parents and the family. It includes 6 subscales measuring parents' self-reported functioning. The scale has five Likert response options, 'never', 'almost never', 'sometimes', 'often' and 'almost always' (corresponding to scores of 100, 75, 50, 25 and 0). Higher scores indicate better functioning.
at 12 months
Quality of life questionnaire for adults
Time Frame: at 24 months
Quality of life will be assessed for adult using "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" EORTC QLQ-C30-V3 questionnaire.The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
at 24 months
Quality of life questionnaire for minors
Time Frame: at 24 months
Quality of life will be assessed for minor using The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) The 36-item PedsQL™ Family Impact Module is a parent-report instrument designed to assess the impact of pediatric chronic health conditions on parents and the family. It includes 6 subscales measuring parents' self-reported functioning. The scale has five Likert response options, 'never', 'almost never', 'sometimes', 'often' and 'almost always' (corresponding to scores of 100, 75, 50, 25 and 0). Higher scores indicate better functioning.
at 24 months
Proportion of patients with a donor chimerism of 90% or more
Time Frame: at 1 months
at 1 months
Proportion of patients with a donor chimerism of 90% or more
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Proportion of patients with a donor chimerism of 90% or more
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Proportion of patients with a donor chimerism of 90% or more
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Proportion of patients with a donor chimerism of 90% or more
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, natural killer (NK), regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, natural killer (NK), regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, natural killer (NK), regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, NK, regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Ferritin levels
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Ferritin levels
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Ferritin levels
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Ferritin levels
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 25, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 25, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractory Idiopathic Aplastic Anemia

Clinical Trials on Allogenic transplantation

Subscribe