Haplo-identical Transplantation in Patients With Myelofibrosis - A Phase 2 Prospective Multicentric Prospective Study (FIBRAPLO)

January 24, 2021 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

The only curative treatment in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells (HSCT). It has been reported that intermediate and higher risk patients according to international prognostic scores benefit from HSCT in terms of survival (Kröger et al, 2015). In 2013, we conducted in France a prospective trial testing the use of ruxolitinib before transplantation ("JAK-ALLO study" NCT01795677). Outcome of patients was better in patients transplanted with a matched sibling donor than an unrelated donor confirming other studies (Kröger et al, 2009; Rondelli et al, 2014). In the JAK-ALLO trial, acute GVHD incidence was high, often hyperacute and severe. Recently, the EBMT group has reported a registry study on familial haplo-identical transplantation (haplo) in patients with myelofibrosis (Raj et al, 2018). Post-transplant cyclophosphamide was used in 59% of cases. One-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 61 and 58% which favorably compared to outcome after unrelated transplantation. Genova team has also reported impressive results after haplo-identical transplantation in their center (Bregante et al, 2015). Bregante et al have reported outcome of 2 cohorts transplanted from 2000 to 2010 and from 2011 to 2014. The main difference between the 2 periods is the more frequent use of haplo in the second period (54% versus 5%). Outcome was much better in the second period with OS at 70% versus 49% and authors suggest that this improvement is related to the best outcome among haplo transplantation. The improvement of outcome after haplo has been attributed to a better GVHD prophylaxis, especially with the use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide. Given the poor outcome after unrelated transplantation and especially in HLA mismatched unrelated setting and encouraging results in family haplo identical transplantation, this current study proposes to test haplo-identical transplantation in myelofibrosis patients without a matched related donor.

The main objective of this study is disease and rejection-free survival one year after haplo-identical transplantation in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

28

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged between 18 and 70 years
  • Primary myelofibrosis or myelofibrosis secondary to essential thrombocythemia or polycythemia Vera proven by marrow biopsy
  • The myelofibrosis should combine at least 2 of the following criteria:

    • constitutional symptoms: weight loss > 10% in one year, fever (without infection), recurrent muscle, bone or join pains, extreme fatigue
    • anemia with hemoglobin < 10 gr/dL or red blood cell transfusion requirement
    • thrombocytopenia < 100 G/L
    • peripheral blast count > 1% at least found 2 times
    • white blood cell count > 25 G/L (before a cytoreductive treatment)
    • Karyotype: +8, -7/7q-, i(17q), -5, 5q-, 12p-, inv(3), 11q23
  • Performance status according to ECOG at 0, 1 or 2
  • With health insurance coverage
  • Having signed a written informed consent
  • Women agreed to take nomegestrol acetate as contraception during and up to 6 months after treatment by treosulfan
  • Men agreed not to conceive child during and up to 6 months after treatment by treosulfan

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Myelofibrosis transformed into acute leukemia
  • Poor performance status with ECOG 3 or more
  • Cardiac failure with EF < or = 50% currently or in the past (even if corrected after treatment)
  • Renal failure with creatininemia > 130 µmol/L or clearance < 50ml/min
  • Respiratory function altered with vital capacity < 70% or forced expired volume < 70%
  • Biological significant liver abnormalities; ASAT or ALAT> 2 x normal range, bilirubin > 1,5 x normal range
  • HLA matched donor available
  • Tutorship or curatorship
  • Unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol
  • Pregnant woman or breastfeeding
  • Contraindications to treosulfan

    • Hypersensitivity to the active substance
    • Active non-controlled infectious disease
    • Fanconi anaemia and other DNA breakage repair disorders
    • Administration of live vaccine
  • Contraindications or any circumstance that precludes the use of the drugs involved in the protocol (especially Thiotepa and Fludarabine)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Allogenic transplantation using treosulfan in conditioning regimen

Haplo-identical transplantation using treosulfan in conditioning regimen Treosuflan, in the conditioning regimen will be administrated as followed 10 gr/m2 per day -4, -3 and -2 IV route

In combination with:

Thiotepa 5 mg/kg on day -6 Fludarabine 30 mg/m2 per day from day -5 to day -1

Haplo-identical transplantation with the use of Treosulfan, Thiotepa and Fludarabine in conditioning regimen.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Disease and rejection free survival
Time Frame: 12 months after haplo-identical transplantation
12 months after haplo-identical transplantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relapse incidence
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Incidence of acute GVHD grade 2/4
Time Frame: at 100 days
Acute GVHD will be assessed according to the modified Glucksberg classification
at 100 days
Incidence of acute GVHD grade 3 or 4
Time Frame: at 100 days
Acute GVHD will be assessed according to the modified Glucksberg classification
at 100 days
Engraftment
Time Frame: at 100 days
Engraftment is defined as neutrophil engraftment : neutrophil count at 0.5G/L or higher for more than 3 consecutive days after transplantation, it should be confirmed by a donor chimerism and platelet recovery: platelet engraftment will be defined as first day of platelet > 20G/L without transfusion the last 7 days assessed on day 100
at 100 days
Incidence of chronic GVHD
Time Frame: at 12 months
Chronic GVHD will be assessed according to the revised Seattle criteria
at 12 months
Non-relapse mortality
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Rejection incidence
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Time to neutrophil engraftment
Time Frame: at 100 days
Neutrophil engraftment is defined as neutrophil count at 0.5G/L or higher for more than 3 consecutive days after transplantation, it should be confirmed by a donor chimerism
at 100 days
Time to platelet engraftment
Time Frame: at 100 days
Platelet engraftment is defined as first day of platelet > 20G/L without transfusion the last 7 days assessed on day 100
at 100 days
Infection incidence
Time Frame: at 100 days
at 100 days
Infection incidence
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Cytokine profile during transplantation
Time Frame: day-6
day-6
Cytokine profile during transplantation
Time Frame: at day 0
at day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 30, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP190648

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelofibrosis

Clinical Trials on Allogenic transplantation transplantation

Subscribe