Portico and Navitor India Clinical Trial

April 2, 2026 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices
The objective of this clinical trial is to collect data on procedural safety and device performance of the Portico and Navitor devices and FlexNav delivery system to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis in the Indian population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective of this Phase IV clinical trial is to characterize the procedural safety and device performance of the Portico valve, the Navitor Valve, the FlexNav delivery system and FlexNav or Navitor loading system to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chennai, India
        • Apollo Hospital
      • Gūrgaon, India
        • Medanta-The Medicity
      • Jaipur, India
        • Rajasthan Hospital
      • Mumbai, India
        • Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital
      • New Delhi, India
        • Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital
      • Vellore, India
        • Christian Medical College & Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical investigation-related procedure.
  2. Are >60 years of age in host country, have severe symptomatic (NYHA class ≥ II) aortic stenosis (AS), at high or extreme surgical risk and have been identified as a candidate for a Portico or Navitor valve implant.
  3. Subjects must have a Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score of ≥7% OR documented heart team agreement of high or extreme risk for surgical aortic valve replacement due to frailty or co-morbidities not captured by the STS score.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have tested positive for the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus at any time AND currently have residual signs or symptoms associated with the COVID-19 virus (eg. evidence of thrombosis, damaged/inflamed heart muscle, damaged/inflamed lung tissue, etc.)
  2. Have sepsis, including active endocarditis
  3. Have any evidence of left ventricular or atrial thrombus
  4. Have vascular conditions (i.e. caliber, stenosis, tortuosity, or severe calcification) that make insertion and endovascular access to the aortic valve improbable
  5. Have a non-calcified aortic annulus
  6. Have congenital bicuspid or unicuspid leaflet configuration
  7. Are unable to tolerate antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy
  8. Are pregnant at the time of signing informed consent
  9. Are currently participating in a drug or device study that may impact this study (unless prior sponsor approval for co-enrollment is granted)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Analysis Population
The analysis population will include patients considered at high or extreme surgical risk, who have met all inclusion criteria, have not met any exclusion criteria, have signed an Ethics Committee (EC) approved Informed Consent, and, at the minimum, the FlexNav delivery system entered his/her vasculature for an attempted Portico or Navitor Valve implant
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VARC-2 Defined Event Rate of All Cause Mortality Rate (Percent of Subjects) at 30 Days From the Implant/Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure

The outcome measures will be defined for all VARC-2 defined endpoints per the published VARC-2 definitions:

1-Kappetein et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2013;145:6-23.

30 days post index procedure
VARC-2 Defined Event Rate of Cardiovascular Mortality Rate (Percent of Subjects) at 30 Days From the Implant/Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure

The outcome measures will be defined for all VARC-2 defined endpoints per the published VARC-2 definitions:

1-Kappetein et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2013;145:6-23.

30 days post index procedure
Myocardial Infarction Rate
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure
Myocardial Infarction rate: percent of subjects who experienced a myocardial infarction within 30 days of the implant/index procedure
30 days post index procedure
VARC-2 Defined Event Rate of Stroke (Including Disabling and Non-disabling, Percent of Subjects) at 30 Days From the Implant/Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure

The outcome measures will be defined for all VARC-2 defined endpoints per the published VARC-2 definitions:

1-Kappetein et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2013;145:6-23.

30 days post index procedure
VARC-2 Defined Event Rate of Bleeding (Life-threatening, Major, Minor, Percent of Subjects) at 30 Days From the Implant/Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure

The outcome measures will be defined for all VARC-2 defined endpoints per the published VARC-2 definitions:

1-Kappetein et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2013;145:6-23.

30 days post index procedure
VARC-2 Defined Event Rate of Acute Kidney Injury (Percent of Subjects) at 30 Days From the Implant/Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure

The outcome measures will be defined for all VARC-2 defined endpoints per the published VARC-2 definitions:

1-Kappetein et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2013;145:6-23.

30 days post index procedure
VARC-2 Defined Event Rate of Vascular Access Site and Access-related Complications (Major and Minor, Percent of Subjects) at 30 Days From the Implant/Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure

The outcome measures will be defined for all VARC-2 defined endpoints per the published VARC-2 definitions:

1-Kappetein et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2013;145:6-23.

30 days post index procedure
VARC-2 Defined Event Rate of Coronary Obstruction (Percent of Subjects) at 30 Days From the Implant/Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure

The outcome measures will be defined for all VARC-2 defined endpoints per the published VARC-2 definitions:

1-Kappetein et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2013;145:6-23.

30 days post index procedure
VARC-2 Defined Event Rate of Permanent Pacemaker Insertion (Percent of Subjects) at 30 Days From the Implant/Index Procedure
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure

The outcome measures will be defined for all VARC-2 defined endpoints per the published VARC-2 definitions:

1-Kappetein et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2013;145:6-23.

30 days post index procedure
Percentage of Subjects With Implant Success
Time Frame: During procedure
Defined as absence of procedural mortality, correct positioning of a single Portico prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location, no conversion to open surgery
During procedure
Echocardiographic Assessment of the Mean Aortic Gradient
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure
Units=mmHg
30 days post index procedure
Echocardiographic Assessment of Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure
units = cm2
30 days post index procedure
Echocardiographic Assessment of Paravalvular Leak (PVL) Per VARC-2 Definitions at 30 Days.
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure
Reported as either none/trace, mild, moderate, or severe
30 days post index procedure
VARC-2 Defined Event Rate of All-Cause Mortality (Percent of Subjects) at 9 Months Post Implant/Index Procedure
Time Frame: 9 months post index procedure

The outcome measures will be defined for all VARC-2 defined endpoints per the published VARC-2definitions:

1-Kappetein et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2013;145:6-23.

9 months post index procedure
VARC-2 Defined Event Rate of Stroke (Including Disabling and Non-disabling, Percent of Subjects) at 9 Months Post-implant/Index Procedure
Time Frame: 9 months post index procedure

The outcome measures will be defined for all VARC-2 defined endpoints per the published VARC-2 definitions:

1-Kappetein et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2013;145:6-23.

9 months post index procedure
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class
Time Frame: 30 days post index procedure
Reported as the percent of subjects by NYHA class from baseline to 30 days and from baseline to 9 months; NYHA Class was measured as class I, II, III, or IV. Symptoms are worsening from I to IV.
30 days post index procedure
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class
Time Frame: 9 months post index procedure
Analysis population for this measure includes only patients who had the assessment completed. Patients who completed a visit but were unable to have NYHA Class assessed are not presented.
9 months post index procedure
EuroQol 5-dimension, 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time Frame: 30 Days
Patients are asked to rate their perception of their health on the day they complete the assessment on a scale of 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the patient has the best health they can imagine, and a score of 0 means the worst health they can imagine. The reported value is the average of all patient scores reported at the specified time point for the specified patient group.
30 Days
EuroQol 5-dimension, 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time Frame: 9 Months
Patients are asked to rate their perception of their health on the day they complete the assessment on a scale of 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the patient has the best health they can imagine, and a score of 0 means the worst health they can imagine. The reported value is the average of all patient scores reported at the specified time point for the specified patient group.
9 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Barathi Sethuraman, Abbott

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 6, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 28, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe