Fluoroscopic Anterior Approach Versus Ultrasound Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis in Cancer Pelvic Pain

August 13, 2022 updated by: Nevert Adel, Mansoura University
Cancer related pelvic pain can be debilitating and difficult to treat. Superior hypogastric plexus neurolysis (SHPN) is considered to be an option for adequately relieving pain, with fewer side effects and improving the quality of life

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The superior hypogastric plexus (SHP) is one of the paravertebral sympathetic ganglia, located in the lower border of the L5 vertebra and upper part of the sacrum in the retroperitoneal space. It is considered as a continuity of the celiac plexus and the lumbar sympathetic ganglia. It is related to the bifurcation of the aorta and the ureters. The SHP has a sympathetic connection (both efferent and afferent fibers) with splanchnic nerves and aortic plexus. It innervates the viscera of the pelvis, including the urinary bladder, ureters, sigmoid colon down to the anal canal, and upper vagina SHP blockade can be performed either by ultrasound (US), fluoroscopic, computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques and it is conducted through anterior (transabdominal) or posterior (lateral, paramedian, oblique, transdiscal, or transvaginal) approaches These different imaging modalities and approaches have been described for SHPN to make it easier, safer and more accurate and satisfied to the patients

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

96

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Mansoura, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Yahya Wahba
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tamer E abdallah, assist prof

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients more than 18 years old of both genders with cancer-related pelvic pain,
  • poor pain control or severe side effects with opioid therapy,
  • ≥ 4 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain that ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain).,
  • American society of Anesthesiology Physical Status class I and II,
  • positive diagnostic block day before the procedure by injecting a local anesthetic (0.25% bupivacaine 10 ml)
  • Body mass index ˂ 30 were included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal,
  • local or systemic sepsis,
  • coagulopathy,
  • unstable cardiovascular and respiratory diseases,
  • previous neurological deficits,
  • history of psychiatric disorders,
  • history of drug abuse,
  • distorted local anatomy,
  • those who were allergic to the used medications were excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group US-guided
will receive superior hypogastric plexus neurolysis by the US-guided anterior approach
An ultrasound system with a 5-2 MHz curved transducer will be used. The division of the abdominal aorta into the common iliac arteries was located using oblique sonography. Then, the transducer will image the body of the fifth lumbar vertebra, at which level bilateral common iliac vessels will be seen leaving a space in the midline. a 20 cm long, 22 gauge Chiba needle will be introduced into the hypogastrium, with out-of-plane technique to access the fifth lumbar vertebral body at its anterior-most point, so that injected drug spreads equally bilaterally along the anterior curvature of the fifth lumbar vertebral body.Suction was applied to the needle to confirm that it was not within a vessel and 10 ml of 50% ethanol will be injected for neurolysis.
Active Comparator: - Group fluoroscopy-guided
will receive superior hypogastric plexus neurolysis by the fluoroscopy-guided anterior approach
The patient will be placed in the supine position. The L5-S1 inter-discal space was identified under fluoroscopy.After providing local cutaneous and subcutaneous anesthesia with 2% Lignocaine solution nearly 3-4 cm below the umbilicus, a 20 cm long, 22 gauges Chiba needle is advanced to the anterior portion of the 5th vertebral body under ongoing fluoroscopic guidance. Once bony resistance is reached, gently inject 2-5 ml contrast which typical reveals a characteristic triangular blob of contrast with no vascular opacification.Before injection the needle is aspirated to confirm there is no blood. A preliminary test dose of about 3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine is then injected. If there is no change in heart rate or neurological status, rest of the 20 cc phenol 10% is injected slowly with intermittent aspiration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The symptom burden was evaluated using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)
Time Frame: 0ne hour before block
It includes the assessment of 10 symptoms experienced by cancer patients with the following 0-10 numeric rating scales: pain, fatigue, drowsiness, nausea, lack of appetite, depression, anxiety, shortness of breath, feeling of well-being, and insomnia.
0ne hour before block
The symptom burden was evaluated using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)
Time Frame: 1 month from block
It includes the assessment of 10 symptoms experienced by cancer patients with the following 0-10 numeric rating scales: pain, fatigue, drowsiness, nausea, lack of appetite, depression, anxiety, shortness of breath, feeling of well-being, and insomnia
1 month from block
The symptom burden was evaluated using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)
Time Frame: 2 months from block
It includes the assessment of 10 symptoms experienced by cancer patients with the following 0-10 numeric rating scales: pain, fatigue, drowsiness, nausea, lack of appetite, depression, anxiety, shortness of breath, feeling of well-being, and insomnia
2 months from block
The symptom burden was evaluated using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)
Time Frame: 3 months from block
It includes the assessment of 10 symptoms experienced by cancer patients with the following 0-10 numeric rating scales: pain, fatigue, drowsiness, nausea, lack of appetite, depression, anxiety, shortness of breath, feeling of well-being, and insomnia
3 months from block

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time of the procedures
Time Frame: intraoperative
time of the procedure
intraoperative
daily analgesic requirements
Time Frame: 3 months from injection
dose of opioid
3 months from injection
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 0ne month after block
0 is very dissatisfied and 10 is very satisfied
0ne month after block

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R.22.01.1598

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain Cancer

Clinical Trials on Group US-guided

Subscribe