A Novel Remote Patient and Medication Monitoring Solution to Improve Adherence and PerSiStence With IBD Therapy (ASSIST)

August 18, 2026 updated by: Sandra Quezada, University of Maryland, Baltimore

A Novel Remote Patient and Medication Monitoring Solution to Improve Adherence and PerSiStence With Inflammatory Bowel DiSease Therapy-ASSIST Study

The investigators hypothesize that use of a remote monitoring digital health system that supports medication taking and monitoring of symptoms will improve adherence, clinical outcomes, and decrease healthcare utilization compared to standard care in participants with inflammatory bowel disease initiating oral or subcutaneous treatment. The investigators are conducting a 12-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a remote monitoring digital health system on adherence, clinical outcomes, and healthcare utilization.

The investigators will address the following specific aims:

  1. Compare adherence as measured by the medication possession ratio in participants using a remote monitoring digital health system compared to standard of care.
  2. Compare clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in participants using a remote monitoring digital health system compared to standard of care.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The investigators hypothesize that use of a remote monitoring digital health system that supports medication taking and monitoring of symptoms will improve adherence, clinical outcomes, and decrease healthcare utilization compared to standard care in participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) initiating oral or subcutaneous treatment. The investigators are conducting a 12-month multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a remote monitoring digital health system on adherence, clinical outcomes, and healthcare utilization.

Adult participants with IBD with regular access to a mobile device or tablet initiating therapy with an oral or subcutaneous treatment for IBD at one of the five sites will be eligible to participate. Participants will be randomized 2:1 to the intervention or standard care. Eligible participants will complete an informed consent and baseline survey gathering demographic and clinical information.

TapptTM digital health system (developed by Synchronyx) is a remote therapeutic monitoring and digital engagement solution that monitors real-time medication adherence patterns through smart label technologies, capture patient reported outcomes (PROs) and barriers to care, and process patient data through algorithms that trigger personalized digital and human touchpoints between clinical visits. The research team will input information into the system on the intervention participant's medication to be tracked, dose, and frequency of dosing. Participants in the intervention group will be shipped the smart labels to be affixed to the pill bottle, pen, or syringe of the newly prescribed medication. Prior to receiving their medication, participants will receive virtual training on how to attach and use the proprietary labels, set up their participant profile, use the participant-facing web app, and seek technical helpdesk support. At the time of a medication dose, participants will scan the label by tapping it with their mobile device to verify that they are taking the medication. Upon scanning, participants immediately will receive a notification on their device indicating that the label was successfully scanned, and that their medication adherence was updated in their profile. The app offers participants visibility into their medication adherence patterns and upcoming doses, as well as the opportunity to respond to in-app questions that capture barriers towards adherence, IBD symptoms, and patient report outcomes (PROs). This information will also be available to the research and clinical team in real-time via the provider dashboard. Most importantly, the dashboard's artificial intelligence-based algorithm will send email alerts to the clinical team if participant's adherence, symptoms, or PROs fall below predetermined thresholds. For oral medications, mean adherence <86% in a 2-week period will trigger an alert. For SC medications, an alert will be generated if a dose is 10 days late for administration. A PRO 2 score for UC or CD of 2 or more will trigger an alert. If alerts are triggered for non-adherence, a clinical nurse, pharmacist, or social worker will contact the participant to identify barriers to adherence; remediation will be initiated if possible.

The primary outcome of the proposed study will be the difference in mean medication possession ratio (MPR) between the intervention and control group during the 12-month study. Secondary outcomes will include self-reported adherence (MARS-5), clinical response and remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index for CD and partial Mayo score of UC), steroid-free response and remission, PROMIS measures of Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference, Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life, self-efficacy (IBD Self-Efficacy Scale), new steroid use, and health care utilization (urgent care or emergency room visit, unplanned office visit, hospitalization, and/or surgery).

Assuming 2 intervention participants for every 1 control with an adherence rate among controls of 0.65 and 0.9 in intervention participations with a Type 1 error rate of 0.05 and power of 0.9, we will need to enroll 82 intervention participants and 41 controls (n=123). All analyses will be completed using intention to treat principles. For categorical variables, the groups will be compared using the Chi Square test (Fisher's Exact if not normally distributed). For continuous variables, the groups will be compared using t tests (Wilcoxon signed rank if not normally distributed). We will also build logistic and linear regression models to adjust for confounding variable for the outcomes of interest. Possible confounding variables include but are not limited to route of administration, gender, insurance type, disease type, age, concurrent psychiatric disease, smoking, and concurrent steroid and/or narcotic use.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

123

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland School of Medicine
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • New York University
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599-7080
        • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. At least 18 years of age or older
  2. Have documented IBD based on usual diagnostic criteria including clinical symptoms and findings from endoscopy, radiology studies, and histology
  3. Initiating treatment with a new oral or subcutaneous treatment for IBD
  4. Have access to a mobile smartphone (iPhone 7 or later; Android release date 2012 or later) with reliable data and/or Wi-Fi access
  5. Ability to understand the protocol and provide informed consent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to speak and read English
  2. Inability to comply with the study protocol
  3. Presence of an ileostomy, colostomy, ileoanal pouch anastomosis, or ileorectal anastomosis
  4. Patients initiating oral corticosteroids only (without concurrent use of an oral or subcutaneous maintenance therapy)
  5. Imminent surgery (within the next 60 days)
  6. History of short bowel syndrome
  7. Uncontrolled medical or psychiatric disease at the opinion of the investigator

    1. Degenerative neurologic condition
    2. Unstable angina
    3. Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease
    4. Malignancy within the last 2 years (excluding squamous or basal cell cancers of the skin)
    5. Poorly controlled depression, mania, and schizophrenia
    6. Serious active infection requiring antimicrobial therapy (excluding CD patients with perianal CD on antibiotics)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Remote Monitoring
At the time of a medication dose, participants scan the smart label by tapping it with their mobile device. Participants receive a notification on their device indicating that their medication adherence was updated. Each day a medication is due, patients receive a morning reminder through SMS message notifying them on their medications schedule. If patients fail to scan the label at a given time (as expected by their specific medication regimen), they will receive an end of day text message. Participants will also complete a patient reported outcome (PRO) 2 assessment at baseline, and then monthly for the entire 12 months of the study through an HTML link sent to patients by SMS message. If nonadherence is present and/or moderate to severe symptoms, an alert will be triggered to the research team. The research team can send the PRO2 survey to patients at any given time, at their discretion, if patients are experiencing a flare or at the time of a change in medication dose.
See prior description of the intervention.
No Intervention: Control
The standard of care for participants in this study is modeled after the standard of care at all five study sites. Standard of care is based on current evidence-based guidelines including a comprehensive assessment, a guideline-concordant therapy plan, scheduled and as needed clinic visits, scheduled and as needed telephone calls, and administration of educational fact sheets about disease-specific topics when appropriate. Personnel used to provide standard of care at each site will vary and may include nurse coordinators, advanced practice providers, social workers, psychologists, dieticians, pharmacists, and other ancillary staff.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medication adherence
Time Frame: 1 year
Medication possession ratio
1 year
Self-reported medication adherence
Time Frame: 1 year
MARS-5, scores from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicated greater adherence
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healthcare utilization
Time Frame: 1 year
Rates of healthcare utilization including office and ER visits, hospitalizations, and diagnostic testing
1 year
IBD Disease activity
Time Frame: 1 year
Harvey Bradshaw Index ( for participants with Crohn's disease only), minimum score 0, no maximum score, higher scores indicated greater disease activity
1 year
IBD Disease activity (objective)
Time Frame: 1 year
C reactive protein, minimum value 0, no maximum value, higher values indicate greater disease activity
1 year
Patient Reported Outcomes, Quality of Life
Time Frame: 1 year
PROMIS Global Health, T scores from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, higher scores indicate better quality of life
1 year
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: 1 year
IBD Self-efficacy scale, scores range from 29-290 with higher scores indicated greater self-efficacy
1 year
IBD Disease Activity
Time Frame: 1 year
Simple clinical colitis activity index (participants with ulcerative colitis only), minimum score 0, maximum score 19, higher scores indicate greater disease activity
1 year
IBD Disease Activity (objective)
Time Frame: 1 year
Fecal calprotectin, minimum value 0, no maximum value, higher values indicate greater disease activity
1 year
IBD Disease Activity (objective)
Time Frame: 1 year
Mayo Endoscopic score (participants with ulcerative colitis only), minimum score 0, maximum score 3, higher scores indicate greater disease activity
1 year
IBD Disease Activity (objective)
Time Frame: 1 year
Simple endoscopic score (participants with Crohn's disease only), minimum score 0, maximum score 60, higher scores indicate greater disease activity
1 year
Patient Reported Outcome (Pain interference)
Time Frame: 1 year
PROMIS Pain Interference, T scores from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, higher scores indicate more pain
1 year
Patient Reported Outcome (Anxiety)
Time Frame: 1 Year
PROMIS Anxiety, T scores from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, higher scores indicate more anxiety
1 Year
Patient Reported Outcome (Depression)
Time Frame: 1 year
PROMIS Depression, T scores from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, higher scores indicate more depression
1 year
Patient Reported Outcome (Fatigue)
Time Frame: 1 year
PROMIS Fatigue, T scores from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, higher scores indicate more fatigue
1 year
Patient Reported Outcome (Sleep Disturbance)
Time Frame: 1 year
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance, T scores from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, higher scores indicate more sleep disturbance
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 6, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After publication, raw data will be made available to other investigators upon receipt of a written request. Release of datasets to secondary users will be subject to approval by the investigators. The request must include a reason for review of the data and type of dataset they wish to receive, and a copy of a curriculum vitae. The dataset provided will be deidentified to prevent breach of confidentiality. Investigators requesting to review our data must sign an agreement that they will not attempt to obtain protected health information on participants. In addition to the raw data, investigators will receive a list of variable and coding definitions. The agreement will specify, the data are to be used for IRB-approved research purposes only and data will not be transferred to other users by the recipient. The methodology for the Tappt system and for the proposed trial will be published.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

See above

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

See above

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe