Testing a Novel Dry Electrode Headset for Electroencephalography Telehealth

October 11, 2023 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
This study will improve access of Veterans with epilepsy living in rural areas to the most important diagnostic procedure for the care of patients with epilepsy: the routine electroencephalogram (EEG). The investigators will test a new method for recording EEG which uses a novel dry electrode system headset that does not require an EEG technologist to operate. The headset integrates the EEG electrodes and amplifier into a compact system which is easily placed on the head. This approach could make it possible for a nurse or nurse assistant with minimal training to record an EEG in a rural community based outpatient clinic (CBOC) as part of an epilepsy telemedicine outreach program along with clinical interviews. The investigators will compare performance of this dry electrode system to standard EEG when it is used by EEG technologists in three VA medical centers. This project has the potential to improve access of Veterans to the EEG procedure and decrease cost to the Veterans Health Care System.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Detailed Description

Title: Testing a Novel Dry Electrode Headset for Electroencephalography Telehealth

Justification: Many Veterans live far away from a VAMC with substantial electroencephalography (EEG) expertise. Travel is difficult for epilepsy patients since they often cannot drive. The investigators propose to study a novel dry electrode system (DES) which does not require EEG technologists to operate and can be operated by a nurse assistant. This DES integrates the electrodes and EEG amplifier into a compact headset which is easily placed on the head (without skin preparation) and could be used in an epilepsy telemedicine outreach program along with clinical interviews. The investigators have performed three preliminary studies with DES headsets. In the first two studies in 33 Veterans performed at a VAMC, the investigators found that the DES was quick to apply, taking only 5-6 minutes to put on by a research subject with the assistance of a neurologist. Subjects preferred the DES headset over the standard EEG system (SES). In the third study a nurse performed 30 DES recordings in a VA community based outpatient clinic (CBOC). Rating of the EEG recordings on a five point scale by three board certified clinical EEG experts (after automated EEG artifact reduction was applied to the recordings) showed that all 30 recordings were of acceptable quality (rated 3 out of 5 or higher with some artifact present) and 18 of 30 recordings were of good quality (rate 4 or above with only minor artifacts present).

Gaps to be address: This study will improve access of Veterans with epilepsy living in rural areas to the most important diagnostic procedure for the care of patients with epilepsy: the routine EEG. Being able to perform routine EEG in CBOCs can decrease cost to the VA system since DES EEG systems are less expensive and because Veterans will not have to travel to VAMCs for EEG. This study will also test the DES system to make sure it can record epileptiform transients (ETs), the pattern in EEG which indicates that patients have epilepsy.

Innovativeness: This study is innovative because it will use a new recording system for EEG that just got FDA approval. This new DES EEG recording system provides a method for recording EEG which is cheaper and much easier to perform than conventional EEG. This study is also innovative because it will test for the first time if a DES can reliably record ETs. (The FDA approval for the DES system was based on EEG signal quality only and not whether it could reliably detect ETs.) The study will also use a new FDA-approved method for automatically removing artifactual signals which can obscure DES EEG recordings.

Specific Aims: The first aim of the project is to test the ability of the DES to record ETs versus the SES. The second aim is to collect data on appointment wait time, appointment cancellation rate, and procedure cost of DES versus SES to project the improvement in Veteran access and potential cost-benefit of DES EEG performed in CBOCs versus SES EEG performed in VAMCs.

Project Methods: This is a diagnostic device trial which will be performed at three sites: the Charleston VAMC, Durham VAMC, and Miami VAMC. For Specific Aim 1, 400 Veterans (200 with a history of an abnormal EEGs in which ETs were recorded and 200 prospective Veterans scheduled for an outpatient EEG) will be recruited to have a DES EEG procedure and a SES EEG procedure performed during a single study visit in a VAMC by an EEG technologist. Each EEG recording will be interpreted and rated for technical quality by three study investigators, who will also annotate the location of ETs in each EEG recording. The fraction of EEGs which demonstrate ETs and the technical quality ratings will be compared. For Specific Aim 2, data will be collected on 300 prospective Veterans scheduled for an outpatient routine EEG, including appointment cancellation rate, travel cost, and other patient factors. Costs for EEG equipment/supplies as well as technician effort/salary and nurse and nurse assistant effort/salary will also be collected. This will be used to project the potential improvement in patient access and potential cost savings of a nurse or nurse technician performing outpatient DES EEG in a CBOC versus an EEG technician performing outpatient SES EEG in a VAMC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

700

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33125
        • Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29401-5703
        • Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249-0001
        • Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aim 1: subjects with history of an EEG within last five years at VA
  • Aim 2: subjects scheduled for an outpatient EEG

Exclusion Criteria:

  • weave hairstyles

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: standard EEG
all subjects will receive both a standard EEG and a dry electrode EEG
all subjects will receive both a standard EEG and a dry electrode EEG
Experimental: dry electrode EEG
all subjects will receive both a standard EEG and a dry electrode EEG
all subjects will receive both a standard EEG and a dry electrode EEG

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection of epileptiform activity in EEG.
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 4 years.
Measuring the technical quality of the DES to record ETs versus the SES.
Through study completion, approximately 4 years.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure Costs of EEG.
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 4 years.
Measuring procedure cost of DES versus SES.
Through study completion, approximately 4 years.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan J Halford, MD, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 27, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 2, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIR 19-408
  • HX003107 (Other Grant/Funding Number: VA Merit Grant)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy

Clinical Trials on standard EEG

3
Subscribe