Palliative Dose Escalated Radiation for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases and Painful Non-Bone Metas

May 29, 2026 updated by: Matthew Pierre Deek, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Palliative Dose Escalated Radiation for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases and Painful Non-Bone Metastases

The investigators hypothesize that with dose escalation to 40-50 Gy in ten fractions, the complete pain response rate at one month can be increased to 40-50% in painful non-spinal bone metastases. Additionally, the investigators hypothesize that utilizing a fractionation scheme with an escalated biologically equivalent dose (BED) will result in a higher proportion of participants responding to treatment, and will also lead to more durable responses. Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that with dose escalation to 40-50 Gy in ten fractions, the complete pain response rate at one month can be increased to 35-45% in painful non-bone metastases

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate dose escalation and pain response in patients with painful non-spinal bone metastases and painful non-bone metastases treated with radiation therapy.

Primary Objective:

To evaluate improvement of complete pain response rate in painful non-spine bone metastases and painful non-bone metastases with dose escalated radiation using a ten fraction radiation regimen

Secondary Objectives:

To evaluate best pain response To evaluate mean pain scores To evaluate the duration of pain response To evaluate the changes in quality-of-life following radiation To evaluate the rates of retreatment with radiation secondary to disease or symptom progression To evaluate treatment related toxicity

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

124

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Hamilton, New Jersey, United States, 08690
        • Not yet recruiting
        • RWJBarnabas Health - Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Lakewood, New Jersey, United States, 08701
        • Recruiting
        • RWJBarnabas Health - Monmouth Medical Center Southern Campus
      • Livingston, New Jersey, United States, 10457
        • Recruiting
        • RWJBarnabas Health - Saint Barnabas Medical Center
        • Contact:
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
        • Recruiting
        • Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
        • Recruiting
        • Cancer Institute Of New Jersey
      • Somerset, New Jersey, United States, 08876
        • Recruiting
        • RWJBarnabas Health - Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Toms River, New Jersey, United States, 08755
        • Recruiting
        • RWJBarnabas Health - Community Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have provided signed informed consent for the trial
  • Aged ≥18 years at the time of informed consent
  • Histologic proof of malignancy
  • Radiologic or histologic evidence of bone metastases or non-bone metastases
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of ≥3
  • Pain Score ≥ 3
  • Life expectancy of six months or more
  • Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol
  • A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant and not breastfeeding
  • Woman of childbearing potential who agrees to follow contraceptive guidance during the treatment period and for at least 120 days after the last dose of study treatment.
  • A male participant must agree to use contraception during the treatment period and for at least 120 days after the last dose of study treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastasis from a highly radiosensitive tumor (eg, lymphoma, myeloma, germ cell tumor)
  • Spinal metastasis
  • Active compression of spinal cord/cauda equina
  • Previous RT or SBRT to the same site
  • > 3 sites requiring radiation treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Palliative radiation dose escalation
The prescribed dose is 50 Gy in 10 fractions. The total dose can be reduced to 40 Gy and the total number of fractions can be reduced to 8 fractions in non-spine metastases to achieve the normal tissue constraints.
A minimum of three daily radiation therapy treatments are required in any given week. Any missed radiation treatments will be made up at the end of the treatment schedule, such that the total number of delivered 5 Gy fractions remains ten.
No Intervention: Therapeutic benefit
Radiation will be delivered as per protocol. For participants experiencing unacceptable toxicity related to study treatment, yet obtaining therapeutic benefit, participants will be allowed to continue treatment, if well tolerated at the discretion of the investigator.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety as assessed by number of participants experiencing adverse events
Time Frame: One month
Number of participants experiencing adverse effects grade three or higher, as defined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0)
One month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity as assessed by number of participants experiencing toxicity and adverse events
Time Frame: One month
This study will utilize the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Version 5.0 for toxicity and Adverse Event reporting
One month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain as assessed by number of participants experiencing pain response
Time Frame: One month

will be measured according to the international consensus guidelines on palliative RT13.

Pain assessment will be based on scores in Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), Visual analog scale (VAS) and Opioid analgesic use (an oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED)) in mg.

Complete response is defined as a pain score of 0 on a scale from 0 to 10 and without an increase in OMED medication use.

Partial response is defined as a decline of ≥2 points in pain score without analgesic increase or a decline in use of OMED of at least 25% or more from baseline without an increase in pain.

Pain progression (PP) is an increase of ≥2 points without a change in OMED use or an increase of 25% or more in OMED compared with baseline with the pain score stable or one point above baseline.

One month
Quality-of-life (QOL) as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Using the 16 item scale
Time Frame: One month

Quality-of-life (QOL) instruments specific to participants with bone metastases or to those receiving palliative care have been developed in recent years. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) have shown excellent reliability and validity in assessing participants with bone metastases fourteen. BPI will be used for QOL assessment at baseline and one month after treatment.The BPI scale defines pain as follows:

Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain. Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain. Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain.

One month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew P Deek, MD, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 152201
  • Pro2022000822 (Other Identifier: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastases, Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION

Subscribe