Randomized Trial on Same-day SBRT and Surgical Stabilization for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases (BLEND)

May 4, 2026 updated by: Helena M Verkooijen, UMC Utrecht

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and pedicLE Screw fixatioN During One Hospital Visit for Patients With Painful Unstable Spinal Metastases: A Randomized Trial (BLEND)

The BLEND RCT aims to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness of same-day SBRT and surgical stabilization with or without decompression for the treatment of symptomatic, unstable spinal metastases on physical functioning four weeks after the start of treatment, compared with the standard of care (surgery followed by radiotherapy as soon as the wound healed sufficiently).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Currently, patients with unstable spinal metastases receive surgical stabilization with/without decompression followed by conventional radiotherapy (cRT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as soon as wound healing allows (at least 1 week). Advancements in radiotherapy techniques makes preoperative radiotherapy possible with sparing of the soft tissues overlying the surgical field. This makes it possible to shorten or even eliminate the time interval between surgery and radiotherapy. This will result in shorter and less hospital visits, earlier pain relief from irradiation, and faster return to systemic therapy without an increase in wound complications due to the short interval between surgery and radiotherapy.

Objective: The BLEND RCT aims to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness of same-day SBRT and surgery for the treatment of symptomatic, unstable spinal metastases on physical functioning four weeks after the start of the treatment, compared with the standard of care (surgery followed by radiotherapy, i.e., CRT or SBRT).

Study design: A phase II randomized controlled trial within the PRospective Evaluation of interventional StudiEs on boNe metastases (PRESENT) cohort including patients with bone metastases, according to the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design.

Study population: Patients with symptomatic (cervical, thoracic and/or lumbar) spinal metastases and impending spinal instability requiring radiotherapy and surgical stabilization with or without decompression.

Intervention: SBRT (with active dose-sparing of the surgical site) and surgical stabilization with or without decompression within 24 hours. The control group will receive the standard of care, which is surgical stabilization with or without decompression followed by cRT or SBRT as soon as the wound is healed sufficiently.

Main study endpoints: The primary endpoint is physical functioning at four weeks after the start of the treatment. Secondary endpoints are pain response, duration of pain relief, length of hospital stay, time to return to systemic therapy, neurological deterioration, adverse events (e.g. wound complications), quality of life and survival. In addition, we will study the cost-effectiveness.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Utrecht, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • University Medical Center Utrecht
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Helena M. Verkooijen, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Roxanne Gal, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic (cervical, thoracic and/or lumbar) spinal metastases from solid tumors and (impending) spinal instability requiring radiotherapy and surgical decompression and/or stabilization
  • Histologic proof of malignancy or radiographic/clinical characteristics indicating malignancy beyond reasonable doubt
  • Radiographic evidence of spinal metastases
  • Participation in PRESENT cohort, including consent for randomization into future trials
  • Fit for (radio)surgery
  • Age >18 years
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • SBRT cannot be delivered, e.g. in patients who cannot lie on the treatment table because of pain
  • Routine surgical decompression and/or stabilization and radiotherapy cannot be performed, e.g., multiple spinal metastases requiring surgical bridging of more than five vertebral levels and/or requiring radiotherapy on more than one location
  • Prior surgery or radiotherapy to the index level(s)
  • Multiple myeloma
  • Neurological deficits (ASIA C, B or A), or partial neurological deficits (ASIA D) with rapid progression (hours to days)
  • Treated with Bevacizumab and other medication with long half-life that interferes with radiotherapy
  • Life expectancy of less than 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Patients will receive high dose, single fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using differential dosing: 18 or 21 Gy on the metastasis. Within 24 hours after SBRT, patients will have surgical stabilization with or without decompression.
SBRT and surgical stabilization with or without decompression within 24 hours
Active Comparator: Control
Patients will undergo the standard of care, which is surgical stabilization with or without decompression, followed by conventional radiotherapy (cRT) or SBRT as soon as the wound is healed sufficiently.
Surgical stabilization with or without decompression followed by cRT or SBRT as soon as the wound is healed sufficiently

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical functioning
Time Frame: at 4 weeks after the start of treatment
Physical functioning is a functional scale from the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire. Patients rate each item on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much), and scale scores were linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score on the functional scale indicates better functioning.
at 4 weeks after the start of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain response
Time Frame: at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks, and 3 months after the start of treatment
Pain response is defined as 1) a decline in worst pain score of at least two points on an NRS of ten at the treated site without increase in analgesic use, or 2) an analgesic decrease of at least 25% without an increase in pain score. Worst pain score will be measured with the Brief Pain Inventory.
at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks, and 3 months after the start of treatment
Duration of pain relief
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Duration of pain relief as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).
up to 3 months
Duration of hospital stay
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Duration of hospital stay in days
up to 3 months
Days until return to systemic treatment
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Days until return to systemic treatment
up to 12 months
Neurological deterioration
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Occurrence of neurological deterioration is defined as deterioration of more than one grade on the American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) scale as measured by physical examination by a neurologists or trained ASIA physician.
up to 12 months
Change in health-related quality of life
Time Frame: at 4 and 8 weeks, and 3 and 6 months after the start of treatment
Change in patient-reported health-related quality of life is measured by the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL at predefined time intervals.
at 4 and 8 weeks, and 3 and 6 months after the start of treatment
Change in health-related quality of life
Time Frame: at 4 and 8 weeks, and 3 and 6 months after the start of treatment
Change in patient-reported health-related quality of life is measured by the EORTC QLQ-BM22 at predefined time intervals.
at 4 and 8 weeks, and 3 and 6 months after the start of treatment
Local control
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Local control according to routine imaging and electronic patient chart
up to 12 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Adverse events are defined as any undesirable experience occurring to a patient during the study, (likely) related to the experimental treatment procedure. All adverse events during hospital stay will be evaluated using the most recent version of the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE; version 5.0, version 6.0 when available at the start of the study) for acute and late toxicity. All adverse events after hospital discharge reported spontaneously by the patient or observed by the investigator or research team will be recorded up to three months after the treatments.
up to 3 months
Progression free survival
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Progression free survival is defined as time between treatment and first sign of progression of disease.
up to 12 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Overall survival is defined as time between treatment and death from any cause.
up to 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: up to 12 months
If same-day SBRT and surgery is more costly and more effective than the standard of care, an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) will be calculated by dividing the extra QALYs by the extra effects. This will give an estimation of the extra costs that are needed to gain one QALY. If this is below the cost-effectiveness threshold, same-day SBRT and surgery is deemed cost-effective. If either same-day SBRT and surgery or the standard of care is less costly and more effective than its alternative, it dominates this alternative and no ICER is necessary to determine cost-effectiveness.
up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Helena M. Verkooijen, Prof, UMC Utrecht

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Metastases

Clinical Trials on Same-day SBRT and spinal surgery

Subscribe