Immune Profile, Neuronal Dysfunction, Metabolomics and Ammonia in Therapeutic Response of HE in ACLF

April 28, 2023 updated by: Madhumita Premkumar, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Dynamic Changes in Immune Profile, Neuronal Dysfunction, Metabolomics and Ammonia in Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Response of Hepatic Encephalopathy in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: a Prospective Cohort Study

There is very little data related to the natural history of disease from covert HE (MHE and grade 1 HE) to overt HE (grades II, III and IV) in ACLF, with implications on long-term neurological recovery after an episode of overt HE. The evolution and pathogenesis of HE is well described in ALF and cirrhosis, but the dynamic changes in HE in ACLF in response to therapy such as ammonia reduction measures, antibiotics to target sepsis and inflammation, measures to alter dysbiosis such as probiotics or fecal microbiota transplant, and measures to target immune dysfunction such as steroids in alcohol-associated hepatitis. The central role of ammonia in the pathogenesis of HE in ACLF has been challenged by recent data. The approach to HE in ACLF has now refocused on systemic and neuro-inflammation, gut dysbiosis, immune dysregulation, and multi-omics approach. Most importantly, the modulation of the metabolome in response to therapy and interventions, and the use of sedatives, paralytic agents, antibiotics etc. in ACLF with HE in a real-world setting has not been reported.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hepatic Encephalopathy (HE) is a neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by cerebral dysregulation due to hepatic metabolic dysfunction and/or porto-systemic shunting (PSS) resulting in bypass of portal blood flow to the systemic circulation without hepatic detoxification. Hepatic Encephalopathy manifests as a broad spectrum of neurological, cognitive or psychiatric abnormalities ranging from subclinical alterations of cerebral function to coma"(1). Subtle alterations in cerebral function are only detectable by neuropsychological or neurophysiological assessment in minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Weissenborn et al., define HE as a 'significant condition of severe chronic or acute liver insufficiency that is characterized mainly by modifications of motor function, cognition, consciousness, personality. HE was traditionally differentiated into 3 categories as Type A, Type B and Type C. Acute-on-chronic liver (ACLF) has emerged as an independent clinical entity in the field of chronic liver disease which is related to high short-term mortality. The pathogenesis of HE involves blood-derived precipitating factors that cause a neurological deficit in patients with cirrhosis. A major presumption of pathogenesis of HE was assumed to be the central role of ammonia. However, there is now a paradigm shift in our understanding of the etiology, pathogenesis, evolution, and clinical correlation of HE in critically ill patients with cirrhosis and ACLF, wherein systemic inflammation, neuronal dysfunction, cerebral edema, oxidative stress and immune dysregulation are key factors in the multifactorial pathogenesis of HE.

In liver failure, changes in gut microbiota and their by-products like amino acid metabolites, ammonia, endotoxin, oxidative stress, result in neurological transmission alterations like changes in glutamine (Glx), GABA transmission and oxidative stress. Systemic inflammation causes the release of pro inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6. They act synergistically with ammonia in developing cognitive dysfunction in patients with HE in and cirrhosis. Currently, there is evidence of the role of neuroinflammation in liver failure. Neuroinflammation is characterized by microglial activation and increased synthesis of the in situ pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α. Additionally, there is increased gut-liver-brain axis signaling that includes effects of chemokines and cytokines, increased monocytes demand after microglial activation, and changed permeability of the blood-brain barrier(BBB).

However, the exact mechanism by which cerebral edema and HE in ACLF is caused by inflammation is not well known. Thus, identification of novel biomarkers using markers of inflammation, metabolomics, and cerebral imaging techniques to assess the severity of HE in ACLF is essential. The presence of HE is a significant negative predictor of survival in patients with ACLF; hence, studies are needed to fill the gap that is present in the monitoring and prognostication of HE in critically ill patients.

Lactulose is mainstay treatment for HE currently and acts beyond mere ammonia reduction. Lactulose therapy over three months causes a reduction in levels of serum endotoxin, arterial ammonia, inflammatory cytokines and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) abnormalities(decreased Glx and increased choline and Myo-inositol) (10). Increased cerebral ammonia causes astrocyte swelling and leads to brain edema (11) Hence, most of the drugs used in the HE treatment primarily target ammonia level reduction in the blood. The therapeutic response and progression of HE in ACLF is yet unclear.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

135

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Chandigarh, India, 160012
        • Recruiting
        • Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Experimental group (A1) n=75 Disease Control Group (A2) [ACLF without HE (n=20)], [Decompensated Cirrhosis without HE (n=20)] Healthy Control group-20

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1 . Age 18-65 years 2. Either gender 3. Patients with ACLF (CANONIC definition) of any etiology with HE ≥grade 2 as per West-Haven Criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with structural brain lesions, stroke, diagnosed neurological disease or history of seizures and are on neuropsychiatric medications, like sedatives, antidepressants, or antiepileptic drugs.
  2. Severe preexisting cardiopulmonary disease.
  3. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or systemic malignancy.
  4. Post liver transplant patients.
  5. HIV/AIDS infection.
  6. Patients who are having active COVID-19 infection.
  7. Those who do not consent to participate in the study.
  8. Those who have TIPS or Porto systemic surgical shunt in situ.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Experimental
All patients with overt HE in ACLF of any etiology.
Disease Control Group
  1. Diseased Control patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure with no Hepatic Encephalopathy
  2. Diseased Control patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis with no Hepatic Encephalopathy
Control Group 2
Healthy Control without any liver disease

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline Assessment of dynamic markers of systemic inflammation (IL-1, IL-6, TNF alpha, CD163, CD10, etc) following HE specific management strategies in ACLF.
Time Frame: Day 0
Systemic inflammation and Immune profiling will be accessed by Flow Cytometry
Day 0
Changes in markers of systemic inflammation (IL-1, IL-6, TNF alpha, CD163, CD10, etc) following HE specific management strategies in ACLF.
Time Frame: Day 7
Systemic inflammation and Immune profiling will be accessed by Flow Cytometry
Day 7
MR Imaging of HE in ACLF
Time Frame: MRI-MRS (At time of Discharge from Hospital)
MRI-MRS
MRI-MRS (At time of Discharge from Hospital)
Assessment of markers of neuronal dysfunction in HE in ACLF
Time Frame: Day 0
Neuronal dysfunction markers will be assessed by ELISA for GFAP, S110B, etc
Day 0
Change in markers of neuronal dysfunction in HE in ACLF
Time Frame: Day 7
Neuronal dysfunction markers will be assessed by ELISA for GFAP, S110B, etc
Day 7
Assessment of conventional markers of HE and clinical outcomes using standard tests like arterial ammonia, WHC and CHESS scores and severity scores of ACLF like (CLIF-C-ACLF/MELD Na).
Time Frame: Day 0
Ammonia will be assessed by PocketChem BA Blood Ammonia meter. WHC, CHESS will be assessed for encephalopathy and severity score will be calculated using blood investigation.
Day 0
Assessment of conventional markers of HE and clinical outcomes using standard tests like arterial ammonia, WHC and CHESS scores and severity scores of ACLF like (CLIF-C-ACLF/MELD Na).
Time Frame: Day 4
Ammonia will be assessed by PocketChem BA Blood Ammonia meter. WHC, CHESS will be assessed for encephalopathy and severity score will be calculated using blood investigation.
Day 4
Assessment of conventional markers of HE and clinical outcomes using standard tests like arterial ammonia, WHC and CHESS scores and severity scores of ACLF like (CLIF-C-ACLF/MELD Na).
Time Frame: Day 7
Ammonia will be assessed by PocketChem BA Blood Ammonia meter. WHC, CHESS will be assessed for encephalopathy and severity score will be calculated using blood investigation.
Day 7
Baseline Metabolomics in patients with HE in ACLF
Time Frame: Day 0
Metabolomics will be performed by LC/GC-MS to find putative metabolites associated with HE
Day 0
Change in Metabolomics following specific management strategies for HE in ACLF and standard medical management of ACLF.
Time Frame: Day 7
Metabolomics will be performed by LC/GC-MS to find putative metabolites associated with HE
Day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Predictors of HE resolution in ACLF
Time Frame: Day 90
Predictability for outcomes of HE resolution and survival will be compared between novel biomarker and conventional tests
Day 90
New hospitalization till 90 days after enrolment.
Time Frame: Day 90
Patient will be followed for 90 days to assess re-hospitalization and recurrence of HE
Day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dr Madhumita Premkumar, DM, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Decompensated Cirrhosis

3
Subscribe