Behavioral Intervention to Reduce Stress Among Black Gender Minority Women

January 28, 2026 updated by: Athena DF Sherman, Emory University

Behavioral Intervention to Reduce Psychological Distress Symptoms Among Black Gender Minority Women Experiencing Chronic Stigma

The research objectives of this study are to first, develop a culturally informed community-based intervention with guidance from community members (via focus groups and theater testing) to reduce the effect of chronic stigma exposure on psychological distress symptoms (PTS and depressive symptoms) among transgender women. Second, the research team will conduct a proof-of-concept trial to determine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the resulting intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The proposed research builds on our previous work with Black gender minority (GM) women and addresses research gaps. The researchers propose to develop and examine the feasibility of an intervention to improve psychological distress symptom management related to chronic stigma exposure among Black GM women. A hybrid delivery model is proposed where a) weekly group sessions will be co-led by a community member with expertise in working with transgender women and a public health nurse, b) supplemental educational content will be available for individual consumption via an online portal or application (and tracked via participant click counts), and c) additional social resources will be available through the online portal or app. Researchers will use an adaptive intervention approach with 7 module-based sessions selected on the basis of post-session assessments of acceptability and satisfaction. The investigators will use standard qualitative and mixed-method approaches (focus groups, key informant interviews with the community advisory board, and a quantitative survey) and iterative design to develop/adapt, refine, and evaluate a culturally informed intervention for transgender women experiencing chronic stigma and psychological distress.

Participants will be recruited via convenience sampling using multiple strategies including passively distributing flyers to LGBTQ+ organizations and clinics, universities, and community colleges; LGBTQ+ and transgender and gender diverse (TGD) group social media platforms; peer referral, and word of mouth; and actively through collaborations with the Casa Ruby case management team and providers at Emory Healthcare and Grady Health Gender Center.

Investigators will use standard qualitative and mixed-method approaches (focus groups, key informant interviews with the community advisory board, and a quantitative survey) and iterative design to develop/adopt, refine, and evaluate a culturally informed intervention for transgender women experiencing chronic stigma and psychological distress. The research team will conduct 4 focus groups of 5 people to address Aim 1. Focus group sessions will last no longer than 2 hours and will be virtual via Zoom.

The research team will conduct a proof-of-concept study to establish the feasibility, including recruitment, retention, and outcome measurement of the developed intervention. Researchers will collect quantitative assessment data on internet-accessible devices via self-administered surveys collected at the time point (T)1; baseline enrollment, T2; Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), T3. immediately post-intervention (within 2 weeks of study completion), and T4. 3-months post-intervention.

The phase 2 intervention trial includes transgender women of any race or ethnicity and will be delivered hybrid with 3 in-person sessions (in Atlanta, GA) and 4 online sessions via Zoom.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Recruiting
        • Emory University School of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • gender is woman/transgender feminine/female
  • assigned male sex at birth
  • speak/read English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in mental health treatment or a controlled consequential environment (e.g. mental health transitional living environment)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: intervention educational content
The base intervention design will contain educational content informed by the Transgender Resilience Intervention Model (TRIM) and adapted from Seeking Safety specific to a) identifying symptoms of psychological distress, b) managing symptoms via coping (individual resilience), and c) developing a social network and using social support/community connection (group resilience).

This is an adaptive intervention approach with 7 module-based sessions selected on the basis of post-session assessments of acceptability and satisfaction;

  1. weekly group sessions will be co-led by a community member with expertise in working with transgender women and a public health nurse,
  2. supplemental educational content will be available for individual consumption via an online portal or application (and tracked via participant click counts), and
  3. additional social resources will be available through the online portal or app.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention Retention Rate
Time Frame: Throughout the intervention (up to 12 weeks)
number screened per month; number enrolled per month and per source; rate of eligibility ≥40%); (≥50% retention rate; reasons for dropouts; acute crisis or avoidance behaviors; incentive structure);
Throughout the intervention (up to 12 weeks)
Average time delay from screening to enrollment and average time to enroll enough participants to form cohorts
Time Frame: From screening to Baseline
The average time it takes for participants to be screened and complete enrollment depending on the study cohorts
From screening to Baseline
Overall attendance/adherence
Time Frame: 2 weeks post-intervention
Session attendance ≥67%; online engagement with educational material via click counts
2 weeks post-intervention
Changes in the intervention fidelity
Time Frame: Throughout the intervention (up to 12 weeks)
Fidelity rates within and between interventionists; range from 0-3, with 2 or higher indicative of high fidelity per domain via the Seeking Safety Adherence Scale (SASS). Tailoring of the SASS will be based on the format used to deliver the intervention content and the focus of the content. For example, the original scale has the following items that may not be appropriate for the created intervention: "Focused on how the topic related to substance use; Gave handouts and made use of them during the session." Thus, these items may be removed or modified to align with content delivery and subject matter. The SASS will be used to periodically assess the fidelity of intervention delivery among each interventionist. Mean scores will be compared between interventionists and scores below 80% will require remediation in the form of individual training with the PI and the interventionist.
Throughout the intervention (up to 12 weeks)
Changes in the proportion of acceptability
Time Frame: Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
assessment acceptability will be assessed by calculating the proportion of planned assessments that are completed and satisfaction ratings ≥75%; duration of assessment visits; reasons for dropouts);
Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Changes in the Intervention acceptability
Time Frame: Throughout the intervention (up to 2 weeks post-intervention)
intervention acceptability (acceptability ≥75%; qualitative assessments; reasons for dropouts; preference/satisfaction ratings ≥75% via Client satisfaction questionnaire); Client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-8; Cronbach's alpha .93; 8-item; 4-point Likert) will be administered at the end of every intervention session to address individual session utility and at T3 for overall satisfaction
Throughout the intervention (up to 2 weeks post-intervention)
Accessibility of the intervention
Time Frame: Throughout the intervention (up to 2 weeks post-intervention)
intervention accessibility (qualitative assessments; reasons for dropouts and adherence; technological literacy; ability to access reliable internet). There is no scale for this instrument.
Throughout the intervention (up to 2 weeks post-intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in PTSD symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment) , 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Psychological distress symptom severity will be measured using the PCL-5 which is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses the 20 DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD. The PCL-5 has a variety of purposes, including monitoring symptoms, and changes during and after treatment, screening individuals for PTSD, and making a provisional PTSD diagnosis. Evidence for the PCL for the diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV suggests that a 5-10-point change represents reliable change (i.e., change not due to chance) and a 10-20-point change represents a clinically significant change. Therefore, it was recommended to use 5 points as a minimum threshold for determining whether the improvements are clinically meaningful using the PCL for DSM-IV.
Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment) , 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Change in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)
Time Frame: Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention

The BDI-II consists of 21 items assessing symptoms of depression experienced during the past 2 weeks. Each item contains four statements reflecting varying degrees of symptom severity. Respondents are instructed to circle the number (ranging from zero to three, indicating increasing severity) that corresponds with the statement that best describes them. Ratings are summed to calculate a total BDI-II score, which can range from 0 to 63. (BDI-II total score, alpha-0.90; cognitive factor, alpha .81; Somatic factor, alpha .87)

Scoring the Beck Depression Inventory:

Low (1-10)-Normal ups and downs; (11-16)-Mild mood disturbance Mild mood disturbance (17-20) Borderline clinical depression; (21-30)=Moderate depression Significant (31-40)-Severe depression; over 40-extreme depression

Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the transgender community connection scale (TCC)
Time Frame: Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Participants will answer questions about community connectedness. Response options: 5-point scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Changes in the multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Participants will answer 12 items about their feelings regarding certain statements. Options range from 1-Very strongly disagree to 7-very strongly agree.
Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Changes in the coping strategies inventory short form (CSI-SF)
Time Frame: Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Questions ask to categorize the degree of avoidant and approach coping behaviors used. 5-point Likert
Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Changes in the coping self-efficacy scale (CSE)
Time Frame: Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Participants will be asked about their confidence or certainty that they can do 26 questions. Cannot do all=0 1,2,3,4,5=Moderately certain can do 6,7,8,9,10=at certain can do
Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Changes in the self-efficacy to manage chronic disease scale (SECMCD)
Time Frame: Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Several questions will be asked about experiences related to "who the participant is". These questions include both how the participant describes herself and how others might describe them. There is no specific score for this instrument.
Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Changes in sleep
Time Frame: Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Sleep will be measured using the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI is a self-rated questionnaire that assesses subjective sleep quality over the previous month. Responses yield seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, and other sleep related issues. The sum of the seven component scores yields a global sleep quality score.
Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Changes in the quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
The quality of life will be measured using the health-related quality of life questionnaire (HRQOL) to assess general and recent days of physical health, mental health, and activity limitation in the past month. Unhealthy days are an estimate of the overall number of days during the previous 30 days when the respondent felt that either his or her physical or mental health was not good. To obtain this estimate, responses to questions 2 and 3 are combined to calculate a summary index of overall unhealthy days, with a logical maximum of 30 unhealthy days.
Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
Changes in the disability/social functioning scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention
The disability/social functioning scale will be measured using the behavior and symptom identification scale (BASIS-24)
Baseline, Mid-intervention (3-6 weeks from baseline assessment), 2 weeks post intervention, 3 months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Athena DF Sherman, PhD, PHN, RN, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00003101
  • 1K23NR020208-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 2025P009839 (Other Identifier: Emory IRB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The research team will share Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices). Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve aims in the approved proposal. Proposals should be directed to adfsherman@emory.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data are available for 5 years at a third-party website (Link to be determined).

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychological Distress

Clinical Trials on Adaptive Intervention Approach

Subscribe