- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05237336
Integrated Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Singapore Malay Muslims (IPS-MBCT)
Integrating Psychology of the Soul With Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Singapore's Malay Muslims With Psychological Distress: A Mixed-Method Study for Effectiveness and Experience
Singapore's Institute of Mental Health (IMH) identified the need for culture-based research and clinical intervention catering to the minority populations in Singapore to foster treatment sustainability and recovery. Singapore's Malay population, account for 13.5% of the population. Malays tend to delay or drop-out of psychological treatments that do not address the cultural concerns which they associate to mental illness, i.e., a spiritual disorder caused by character flaws, evil spirits, or religious negligence.
The study examines the effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy - Integrated with Psychology of Soul (MBCT-IPS) with Singaporean Malay Muslims with psychological distress. The secondary aims are to explore their experiences and perceptions on the intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. It may provide mental health practitioners with a treatment option that may be integrated with standard therapies.
Methods: This mixed-method, three-group randomised controlled trial recruited 80Malay Muslims with psychological distress at a psychiatric rehabilitation organisation. Participants will be randomly allocated to an MBCT-IPS experimental group, an MBCT group, or individual counselling-as-usual. MBCT-IPS is a 2+8-week group intervention that integrates the Psychology of Soul (IPS) with the standard Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT).
General Linear Model (GLM) with an intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol approach will analyse the study. Participants' and treatment providers' qualitative experiences will be thematically analysed for the acceptability of treatment after the study.
Expected results: Overall improvements in outcome measures are expected with significant differences between groups. Qualitative experiences are hoped to be enriching and therapeutic for both participants and treatment providers, with treatment being appropriate, acceptable, and feasible.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study examines the effects of MBCT-Integrated with Psychology of Self (IPS), MBCT, and one-on-one counselling-as-usual to reduce symptoms of psychological distress, and increase positive mental health and self-compassion. The IPS combines two modules from the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (MUIS)'s Adult Islamic Learning (ADIL) programs, the 'An Introduction to Maqasid Syariah' and 'Grief and Suffering', with Dr Abdallah Rothman's grounded theory in Islamic Psychology. The IPS sessions will include Islamic psychoeducation and exercises on purpose, acceptance, letting go, and Islamic concepts on biopsychosocial-spiritual care.
The study also examines whether the participants would consider the intervention appropriate, acceptable, and feasible. We are also interested in exploring participants' understanding and meaning of the intervention and factors contributing to intervention compliance.
Procedure:
Researchers will invite Malay Muslim adults working in the private community, social service organisations, mosques, societies, support groups or studying in higher institutions of learning/universities to participate in the study. They may also invite family and friends to take part in the research. However, participants will not be informed of the various therapies provided or whether their allocation is to the experimental or control groups.
Individuals interested in participating in this study will submit a request online on Qualtrics for researchers to contact them. The Qualtrics form will include the pre-assessment measure Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21).
To screen the participants, the researchers will interview potential participants individually online. The interview will (a) assess the participants' suitability utilising the screening questionnaire that includes items for exclusion criteria, (b) readiness for intervention, (c) and informs participants about the process and demands of the study. Informed consent approved by the Agency for Integrated Care (AIC) Institutional Review Board (IRB) will be verbally obtained during the interview. Participants who agree to commit to all the assessment sessions and consent to sessions be recorded will receive the registration link. The online registration form includes a consent form, the participant's demographic information, the 19-item Positive Mental Health (PMH-19), and 12-item Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF).
Assessments will be conducted on Qualtrics at five points: pre-intervention, fourth week, last session, and follow-up at 1-month & 3-months.
Those who meet the exclusion criteria and are unsuitable for MBCT will be referred to other programs at Club HEAL. Participants may withdraw from intervention at any point before or during intervention and will be contacted for their feedback. Participants who complete the assessments receive honorariums. All participants will be offered the most effective intervention at the end of the study.
Randomisation:
When participants submit their online registration, they will be randomly assigned to an intervention arm. Participants will receive their assignment and schedule via the Qualtrics email distribution.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Noraini A Wahab, MA
- Phone Number: +6589228212
- Email: noraini.ahaw@live.iium.edu.my
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jamilah H Abdul Khaiyom, PhD
- Phone Number: +603 6196 5151
- Email: hanum@iium.edu.my
Study Locations
-
-
-
Singapore, Singapore, 419975
- PERGAS
-
Singapore, Singapore, 650254
- Club HEAL
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Must be Malay Muslim, identifying with the Malay race,
- can speak and understand English,
- scoring Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF > 61)
- scoring Mild to Extremely Severe in DASS-21, for at least one subscale of Depression: 5-21; Anxiety: 4-21; Or Stress: 8-21
Exclusion Criteria: Patients (whether inpatient or outpatient) or individuals who report having:
- a diagnosed mental disorder (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, & post-traumatic stress disorder or any other mental disorders )
- psychotic symptoms
- actively suicidal.
- personality disorder, including substance use and addiction.
- neurocognitive disorders or cognitive impairment.
- persons who have previously undergone structured MBCT treatment or concurrently receiving psychological treatment elsewhere.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: MBCT-IPS
Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) integrated with cultural Psychology of Soul (IPS) 2-session (IPS) + standard 8-session (MBCT)
|
MBCT is a relapse prevention program that is used to teach participants with chronic physical/mental ailment (used to their conditions):
UK's NICE recommends MBCT for persons who are well and have had 3 or more episodes of depression. MBCT benefits persons whose distress is triggered by the way they process experiences. |
Active Comparator: Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy
Standard 8-session Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)
|
MBCT is a relapse prevention program that is used to teach participants with chronic physical/mental ailment (used to their conditions):
UK's NICE recommends MBCT for persons who are well and have had 3 or more episodes of depression. MBCT benefits persons whose distress is triggered by the way they process experiences. |
Other: Counselling as usual
8-session Control group
|
Control group, Counselling as usual
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Depression, Anxiety, Stress Score (DASS-21) at Week 0
Time Frame: Week 0
|
DASS-21 has twenty-one questions, and is a self-administered survey, measuring core symptoms associated with depression, anxiety, and stress on a four-point Likert scale to indicate each symptom's frequency and intensity for the past week.
Ratings begin at 0 as "Never" to 3 for "Almost Always".
Depression is interpreted as "normal" when the score is between 0-4, mild at 5-6, moderate at 7-10, severe at 11-13 and extremely severe at 14+.
Anxiety is categorised as normal between 0-3, mild at 4-5, moderate at 6-7, severe at 8-9 and extremely severe at 10 or more.
Stress is indicated as "normal" between 0-7, "mild" at 8-9, "moderate" at 10-12, severe at 13-16 and extremely severe at 17 or more
|
Week 0
|
Change from Baseline to Depression, Anxiety, Stress Score (DASS-21) at Week 4
Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 4
|
DASS-21 has twenty-one questions, and is a self-administered survey, measuring core symptoms associated with depression, anxiety, and stress on a four-point Likert scale to indicate each symptom's frequency and intensity for the past week.
Ratings begin at 0 as "Never" to 3 for "Almost Always".
Depression is interpreted as "normal" when the score is between 0-4, mild at 5-6, moderate at 7-10, severe at 11-13 and extremely severe at 14+.
Anxiety is categorised as normal between 0-3, mild at 4-5, moderate at 6-7, severe at 8-9 and extremely severe at 10 or more.
Stress is indicated as "normal" between 0-7, "mild" at 8-9, "moderate" at 10-12, severe at 13-16 and extremely severe at 17 or more
|
Week 0 and Week 4
|
Change from Week 4 in Depression, Anxiety, Stress Score (DASS-21) and Week 8
Time Frame: Week 4 and Week 8
|
DASS-21 has twenty-one questions, and is a self-administered survey, measuring core symptoms associated with depression, anxiety, and stress on a four-point Likert scale to indicate each symptom's frequency and intensity for the past week.
Ratings begin at 0 as "Never" to 3 for "Almost Always".
Depression is interpreted as "normal" when the score is between 0-4, mild at 5-6, moderate at 7-10, severe at 11-13 and extremely severe at 14+.
Anxiety is categorised as normal between 0-3, mild at 4-5, moderate at 6-7, severe at 8-9 and extremely severe at 10 or more.
Stress is indicated as "normal" between 0-7, "mild" at 8-9, "moderate" at 10-12, severe at 13-16 and extremely severe at 17 or more
|
Week 4 and Week 8
|
Change from Week 4 in Depression, Anxiety, Stress Score (DASS-21) and Week 10
Time Frame: Week 4 and Week 10
|
DASS-21 has twenty-one questions, and is a self-administered survey, measuring core symptoms associated with depression, anxiety, and stress on a four-point Likert scale to indicate each symptom's frequency and intensity for the past week.
Ratings begin at 0 as "Never" to 3 for "Almost Always".
Depression is interpreted as "normal" when the score is between 0-4, mild at 5-6, moderate at 7-10, severe at 11-13 and extremely severe at 14+.
Anxiety is categorised as normal between 0-3, mild at 4-5, moderate at 6-7, severe at 8-9 and extremely severe at 10 or more.
Stress is indicated as "normal" between 0-7, "mild" at 8-9, "moderate" at 10-12, severe at 13-16 and extremely severe at 17 or more
|
Week 4 and Week 10
|
Change from Week 10 in Depression, Anxiety, Stress Score (DASS-21) at 1-month follow-up
Time Frame: Week 10 and 1-month follow-up
|
DASS-21 has twenty-one questions, and is a self-administered survey, measuring core symptoms associated with depression, anxiety, and stress on a four-point Likert scale to indicate each symptom's frequency and intensity for the past week.
Ratings begin at 0 as "Never" to 3 for "Almost Always".
Depression is interpreted as "normal" when the score is between 0-4, mild at 5-6, moderate at 7-10, severe at 11-13 and extremely severe at 14+.
Anxiety is categorised as normal between 0-3, mild at 4-5, moderate at 6-7, severe at 8-9 and extremely severe at 10 or more.
Stress is indicated as "normal" between 0-7, "mild" at 8-9, "moderate" at 10-12, severe at 13-16 and extremely severe at 17 or more
|
Week 10 and 1-month follow-up
|
Change from 1-month follow-up in Depression, Anxiety, Stress Score (DASS-21) at 3-month follow-up
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up and 3-month follow-up
|
DASS-21 has twenty-one questions, and is a self-administered survey, measuring core symptoms associated with depression, anxiety, and stress on a four-point Likert scale to indicate each symptom's frequency and intensity for the past week.
Ratings begin at 0 as "Never" to 3 for "Almost Always".
Depression is interpreted as "normal" when the score is between 0-4, mild at 5-6, moderate at 7-10, severe at 11-13 and extremely severe at 14+.
Anxiety is categorised as normal between 0-3, mild at 4-5, moderate at 6-7, severe at 8-9 and extremely severe at 10 or more.
Stress is indicated as "normal" between 0-7, "mild" at 8-9, "moderate" at 10-12, severe at 13-16 and extremely severe at 17 or more
|
1-month follow-up and 3-month follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Positive Mental Health (PMH-19) to Week 0
Time Frame: Week 0
|
This 19-item instrument was developed and tested by the IMH research team to assess the six dimensions of positive mental health in Singapore's multi-ethnic population.
subscales consist of General Coping (2-items), Emotional support (3-items), Spirituality (4-items), Interpersonal skills (3-items), Personal Growth & Autonomy (4-items), Global affect (3-items).
Participants will select on a scale of 1 (not at all like me) to 6 (exactly like me) for the first five subscales.
On the 6th subscale, participants indicate how frequently they felt over the past month on a five-point response scale.
Scores are added over each subscale and divided by the number of items in that subscale.
Higher subscale scores indicate a higher PMH.
|
Week 0
|
Change from Baseline in Positive Mental Health (PMH-19) to Week 4
Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 4
|
This 19-item instrument was developed and tested by the IMH research team to assess the six dimensions of positive mental health in Singapore's multi-ethnic population.
subscales consist of General Coping (2-items), Emotional support (3-items), Spirituality (4-items), Interpersonal skills (3-items), Personal Growth & Autonomy (4-items), Global affect (3-items).
Participants will select on a scale of 1 (not at all like me) to 6 (exactly like me) for the first five subscales.
On the 6th subscale, participants indicate how frequently they felt over the past month on a five-point response scale.
Scores are added over each subscale and divided by the number of items in that subscale.
Higher subscale scores indicate a higher PMH.
|
Week 0 and Week 4
|
Change from Week 4 in Positive Mental Health (PMH-19) up to Week 8
Time Frame: Week 4 up to Week 8
|
This 19-item instrument was developed and tested by the IMH research team to assess the six dimensions of positive mental health in Singapore's multi-ethnic population.
subscales consist of General Coping (2-items), Emotional support (3-items), Spirituality (4-items), Interpersonal skills (3-items), Personal Growth & Autonomy (4-items), Global affect (3-items).
Participants will select on a scale of 1 (not at all like me) to 6 (exactly like me) for the first five subscales.
On the 6th subscale, participants indicate how frequently they felt over the past month on a five-point response scale.
Scores are added over each subscale and divided by the number of items in that subscale.
Higher subscale scores indicate a higher PMH.
|
Week 4 up to Week 8
|
Change from Week 4 in Positive Mental Health (PMH-19) up to Week 10
Time Frame: Week 4 up to Week 10
|
This 19-item instrument was developed and tested by the IMH research team to assess the six dimensions of positive mental health in Singapore's multi-ethnic population.
subscales consist of General Coping (2-items), Emotional support (3-items), Spirituality (4-items), Interpersonal skills (3-items), Personal Growth & Autonomy (4-items), Global affect (3-items).
Participants will select on a scale of 1 (not at all like me) to 6 (exactly like me) for the first five subscales.
On the 6th subscale, participants indicate how frequently they felt over the past month on a five-point response scale.
Scores are added over each subscale and divided by the number of items in that subscale.
Higher subscale scores indicate a higher PMH.
|
Week 4 up to Week 10
|
Change from Week 10 in Positive Mental Health (PMH-19) at 1-month follow-up
Time Frame: Week 10 and 1-month follow-up
|
This 19-item instrument was developed and tested by the IMH research team to assess the six dimensions of positive mental health in Singapore's multi-ethnic population.
subscales consist of General Coping (2-items), Emotional support (3-items), Spirituality (4-items), Interpersonal skills (3-items), Personal Growth & Autonomy (4-items), Global affect (3-items).
Participants will select on a scale of 1 (not at all like me) to 6 (exactly like me) for the first five subscales.
On the 6th subscale, participants indicate how frequently they felt over the past month on a five-point response scale.
Scores are added over each subscale and divided by the number of items in that subscale.
Higher subscale scores indicate a higher PMH.
|
Week 10 and 1-month follow-up
|
Change from 1-month follow-up in Positive Mental Health (PMH-19) at 3-month follow-up
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up and 3-month follow-up
|
This 19-item instrument was developed and tested by the IMH research team to assess the six dimensions of positive mental health in Singapore's multi-ethnic population.
subscales consist of General Coping (2-items), Emotional support (3-items), Spirituality (4-items), Interpersonal skills (3-items), Personal Growth & Autonomy (4-items), Global affect (3-items).
Participants will select on a scale of 1 (not at all like me) to 6 (exactly like me) for the first five subscales.
On the 6th subscale, participants indicate how frequently they felt over the past month on a five-point response scale.
Scores are added over each subscale and divided by the number of items in that subscale.
Higher subscale scores indicate a higher PMH.
|
1-month follow-up and 3-month follow-up
|
Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF12) to Week 0
Time Frame: Week 0
|
12-item measure, six domains: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. There are 2-items for each domain. Participants indicate on each item, in response to, "How I typically act towards myself in difficult times", from the 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 being "almost never" to 5 being "almost always". subscales calculate scores to identify domains to improve. An overall score will also be calculated, with the average score being three and the cut off being five. In the domains of self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification, scores higher than 3 indicates lesser self-compassion. In self-kindness, common humanity and mindfulness, scores above 3 indicate higher self-compassion. |
Week 0
|
Change from Baseline in Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF12) to Week 4
Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 4
|
12-item measure, six domains: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. There are 2-items for each domain. Participants indicate on each item, in response to, "How I typically act towards myself in difficult times", from the 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 being "almost never" to 5 being "almost always". subscales calculate scores to identify domains to improve. An overall score will also be calculated, with the average score being three and the cut off being five. In the domains of self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification, scores higher than 3 indicates lesser self-compassion. In self-kindness, common humanity and mindfulness, scores above 3 indicate higher self-compassion. |
Week 0 and Week 4
|
Change from Week 4 in Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF12) at Week 10
Time Frame: Week 4 and Week 10
|
12-item measure, six domains: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. There are 2-items for each domain. Participants indicate on each item, in response to, "How I typically act towards myself in difficult times", from the 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 being "almost never" to 5 being "almost always". subscales calculate scores to identify domains to improve. An overall score will also be calculated, with the average score being three and the cut off being five. In the domains of self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification, scores higher than 3 indicates lesser self-compassion. In self-kindness, common humanity and mindfulness, scores above 3 indicate higher self-compassion. |
Week 4 and Week 10
|
Change from Week 10 in Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF12) at 1-month follow-up
Time Frame: Week 10 and 1-month follow-up
|
12-item measure, six domains: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. There are 2-items for each domain. Participants indicate on each item, in response to, "How I typically act towards myself in difficult times", from the 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 being "almost never" to 5 being "almost always". subscales calculate scores to identify domains to improve. An overall score will also be calculated, with the average score being three and the cut off being five. In the domains of self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification, scores higher than 3 indicates lesser self-compassion. In self-kindness, common humanity and mindfulness, scores above 3 indicate higher self-compassion. |
Week 10 and 1-month follow-up
|
Change from 1-month follow-up in Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF12) at 3-month follow-up
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up and 3-month follow-up
|
12-item measure, six domains: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. There are 2-items for each domain. Participants indicate on each item, in response to, "How I typically act towards myself in difficult times", from the 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 being "almost never" to 5 being "almost always". subscales calculate scores to identify domains to improve. An overall score will also be calculated, with the average score being three and the cut off being five. In the domains of self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification, scores higher than 3 indicates lesser self-compassion. In self-kindness, common humanity and mindfulness, scores above 3 indicate higher self-compassion. |
1-month follow-up and 3-month follow-up
|
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Time Frame: Week 4
|
4-item psychometric measure used to assess perceived acceptability.
Participants indicate on the five-point Likert scale from "Completely Disagree" to "Completely Agree".
The score is calculated by averaging the response.
|
Week 4
|
Change from Week 4 in Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Week 10
Time Frame: Week 4 and Week 10
|
4-item psychometric measure used to assess perceived acceptability.
Participants indicate on the five-point Likert scale from "Completely Disagree" to "Completely Agree".
The score is calculated by averaging the response.
|
Week 4 and Week 10
|
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Time Frame: Week 4
|
4-item psychometric measure used to assess perceived appropriateness.
Participants indicate on the five-point Likert scale from "Completely Disagree" to "Completely Agree".
The score is calculated by averaging the response.
|
Week 4
|
Change from Week 4 in Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Week 10
Time Frame: Week 4 and Week 10
|
4-item psychometric measure used to assess perceived appropriateness.
Participants indicate on the five-point Likert scale from "Completely Disagree" to "Completely Agree".
The score is calculated by averaging the response.
|
Week 4 and Week 10
|
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: Week 4
|
4-item psychometric measure used to assess perceived feasibility of treatment.
Participants indicate on the five-point Likert scale from "Completely Disagree" to "Completely Agree".
The score is calculated by averaging the response.
|
Week 4
|
Change from Week 4 in Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) and Week 10
Time Frame: Week 4 and Week 10
|
4-item psychometric measure used to assess perceived feasibility of treatment.
Participants indicate on the five-point Likert scale from "Completely Disagree" to "Completely Agree".
The score is calculated by averaging the response.
|
Week 4 and Week 10
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Focus Group Discussions (FGD)
Time Frame: 3-month post-intervention
|
Participants' experience will be recorded during the focus group discussion, guided by the semi-structured questionnaire.
|
3-month post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jamilah H Abdul Khaiyom, PhD, International Islamic University Malaysia
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Grensman A, Acharya BD, Wandell P, Nilsson GH, Falkenberg T, Sundin O, Werner S. Effect of traditional yoga, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy, on health related quality of life: a randomized controlled trial on patients on sick leave because of burnout. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018 Mar 6;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2141-9.
- Zemestani M, Fazeli Nikoo Z. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for comorbid depression and anxiety in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2020 Apr;23(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s00737-019-00962-8. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
- Chan SHW, Chan WWK, Chao JYW, Chan PKL. A randomized controlled trial on the comparative effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and health qigong-based cognitive therapy among Chinese people with depression and anxiety disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02994-2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Psychological Distress
-
Utah State UniversityRecruitingPsychological Distress | Psychological Flexibility | Psychological Well-BeingUnited States
-
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"RecruitingPsychological Distress | Psychological Intervention | University StudentsItaly
-
Gunther MeinlschmidtRecruitingPsychological DistressGermany
-
Duke UniversityNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)Recruiting
-
University of WaterlooActive, not recruitingPsychological DistressCanada
-
Dokuz Eylul UniversityActive, not recruitingPsychological DistressTurkey
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemUniversity of Colorado, Denver; Military Suicide Research ConsortiumCompletedPsychological DistressUnited States
-
University of ZurichFreie Universität BerlinTerminatedPsychological DistressSwitzerland, Germany
-
Combat StressRoyal British LegionCompletedPsychological DistressUnited Kingdom
-
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health ServicesUniversity of Oslo; University of Tromso; Norwegian Medical AssociationUnknown
Clinical Trials on Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy
-
University of WarsawNot yet recruitingModerate Depressive Episode | Mild Depressive Episode
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityTerminatedPostpartum Depression | Prenatal Stress | Maternal Psychological DistressUnited States
-
The University of QueenslandUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham; Rush University Medical Center; University...Completed
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityCompletedPregnancy Related | Infant Development | Prenatal Stress | Functional Neuroimaging | Maternal Psychological DistressUnited States
-
University of WashingtonNational Multiple Sclerosis SocietyCompletedMultiple SclerosisUnited States
-
Vancouver Coastal HealthRecruitingSituational Erectile DysfunctionCanada
-
Massachusetts General HospitalMayo Clinic; University of Pennsylvania; University of South Florida; University... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenCompleted
-
University of California, Los AngelesCompletedMood Disorders | Bipolar Disorder | Parents | Prodromal Symptoms | Clinical High RiskUnited States
-
Qazvin University Of Medical SciencesUnknownInsomniaIran, Islamic Republic of