Conscious Sedation for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

May 1, 2026 updated by: Agathi Karakosta, University of Ioannina

Comparative Study of Propofol Versus Dexmedetomidine for Conscious Sedation During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Aortic valve stenosis is the heart valve disease with the highest prevalence among the elderly, and may lead to heart failure. Until recently, the only definitive treatment was surgical replacement (SAVR). However, the increased risk associated with the surgical procedure excluded patients with multiple co-morbidities. As the population is aging and more and more patients may present with aortic stenosis, the need of a less invasive approach has emerged. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) offered an alternative therapy for these high risk patients. This new method has seen worldwide acceptance, has been proven very beneficial for these patients, and therefore its indications have been expanded to intermediate risk patients, as well. Until recently, general anesthesia was the primary anesthetic technique for TAVR, but conscious sedation or monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is gaining more and more popularity lately. Our knowledge regarding the comparison between general anesthesia and MAC in TAVR procedures is derived mainly from observational studies and few randomized trials. MAC seems to be associated with less inotropic drug usage, shorter procedural times, shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay. However, according to published data, there were no differences in 30-day mortality and complications between these two techniques.

Even less are known about the most suitable anesthetic agent for MAC during TAVR. Many drugs have been used, with propofol and dexmedetomidine being the most popular. However, there are only few comparative studies and their results are not conclusive.

This study compares MAC under propofol and MAC under dexmedetomidine for TAVR in order to examine which method of conscious sedation comes with more beneficial postoperative outcomes for the patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aortic valve stenosis is the most common heart valve disease among the elderly, and eventually may lead to heart failure. Its surgical replacement (SAVR) was the only definitive treatment, but this operation is considered to be of increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Also, there is a growing number of elderly with severe co-morbidities, who are considered as high risk patients, that cannot undergo such an operation. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) offered an alternative method of treatment for these patients. Furthermore, its indications were expanded to intermediate risk patients due to its advantages over SAVR.

At first, general anesthesia was the most popular anesthetic method for TAVR. However, conscious sedation and Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) have emerged as advantageous alternatives, in terms of inotropic drug usage, procedural times, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay. However, few data exist about the anesthetic agents that are most suitable for TAVR under MAC, with propofol and dexmedetomidine being the most popular of them.

This is a prospective comparative study of propofol versus dexmedetomidine used for MAC in TAVR procedures. The patients will be randomly allocated into two groups and will be sedated by continuous infusion of either propofol or dexmedetomidine during the TAVR procedure. These two groups will be assessed for the overall quality of the sedation method, the clinical outcomes, the adverse events and the duration of hospitalization. At the preoperative evaluation, detailed patients' medical history will be taken, their comorbidities, physique, heart echocardiography measurements, level of frailty, renal function and neurocognitive level will be assessed and recorded and, finally, signed consent will be obtained.

During the procedure, the depth of sedation will be monitored with the use of Patient State Index (PSI) and the fluctuation of arterial pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation, the administration of vasoactive agents and fluids, apnea episodes and diuresis will be also recorded. By the end of the procedure, the volume and type of contrast agent used, the type of the implanted valve and the duration of both the sedation and the operation will be documented. Throughout their hospitalization, adverse events, renal function and neurocognitive level will be recorded, along with the occurrence of postoperative delirium. After patients' discharge, their duration of hospitalization, both in cardiac intensive care unit and cardiology clinic will be recorded. Follow up of the patients will be completed after thirty days. All-cause mortality will be assessed at this point and there will be a detailed recording of any adverse events and/or re-hospitalization along with long-term assessment of renal and cognitive function.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Epirus
      • Ioannina, Epirus, Greece
        • Univesity Hospital of Ioannina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for TAVR

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency operation
  • Pre-existing neurocognitive dysfunction (Mini Mental State Examination score <23)
  • Inability to cooparate - communicate
  • End Stage Renal Disease
  • Allergy to any of the administrated drugs
  • No consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Propofol group
Continuous infusion of propofol
Sedation under continuous infusion of propofol. Small doses of fentanyl will be administered if needed.
Other Names:
  • Prop Group
Active Comparator: Dexmedetomidine group
Continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine
Sedation under continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine. Small doses of fentanyl will be administered if needed.
Other Names:
  • Dex Group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of serum creatinine from baseline
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
Assessment of renal function by serial measurements of serum creatinine (mg/dL) at four different time points (at baseline, at 24 hours, at 48 hours and at 30 days postoperatively).
Up to 30 days
Change of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) from baseline
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
Assessment of renal function by serial measurements of BUN (mg/dL) at four different time points (at baseline, at 24 hours, at 48 hours and at 30 days postoperatively).
Up to 30 days
Change of serum cystatin C from baseline
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
Assessment of renal function by serial measurements of serum cystatin C (mg/l) at four different time points (at baseline, at 24 hours, at 48 hours and at 30 days postoperatively).
Up to 30 days
Change of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from baseline using the Cockcoft-Gault equation
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
Assessment of renal function by serial calculations of GFR (ml/min) at four different time points (at baseline, at 24 hours, at 48 hours and at 30 days postoperatively) using the Cockcoft-Gault equation.
Up to 30 days
Change of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from baseline using the MDRD equation
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
Assessment of renal function by serial calculations of GFR (ml/min) at four different time points (at baseline, at 24 hours, at 48 hours and at 30 days postoperatively) using the MDMR equation.
Up to 30 days
Postoperative dellirium
Time Frame: 48 hours
Recording of postoperative delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) score.
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Death
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
The occurence of death
Up to 30 days
Neurocognitive level
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
Assessment of neurocognitive function of the patient with the use of the mini mental state examination (MMSE) score.
Up to 48 hours
Vasoactive and inotropic agents
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
The usage of norepinephrine, epinephrine, phenylephrine, ephedrine, nitroglycerin, atropine, or other relevant agents will be recorded as the cumulative dosage of each administered during the procedure.
Intraoperatively
Stroke
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
The occurrence of stroke after the procedure will be assessed as a binary outcome variable (yes/no).
Up to 30 days
Myocardial infraction
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
The occurrence of myocardial infraction after the procedure will be assessed as a binary outcome variable (yes/no).
Up to 30 days
Acute heart failure
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
The occurrence of acute heart failure after the procedure will be assessed as a binary outcome variable (yes/no).
Up to 30 days
Life threatening arrythmias
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
The occurrence of life threatening arrythmias after the procedure will be assessed as a binary outcome variable (yes/no).
Up to 30 days
Rehospitalization
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
The occurrence of rehospitalization will be assessed as a binary outcome variable (yes/no).
Up to 30 days
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
Pain intensity will be recorded using the numerical rating scale (NRS).
Up to 48 hours
Headache
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
The occurrence of headache after the procedure will be assessed as a binary outcome variable (yes/no)
Up to 48 hours
Nausea/vomiting
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
The occurrence of nausea/vomiting after the procedure will be assessed by a 5-point scale (0 to 4, with 4 indicating the worse outcome).
Up to 48 hours
Pruritus
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
The occurrence of pruritus after the procedure will be assessed by an 11-point scale (0 to 10, with 10 indicating the worse outcome).
Up to 48 hours
Hypoxemia
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
The occurrence of hypoxemia after the procedure will be assessed by continuous monitoring of oxygen level (SpO2).
Up to 48 hours
Duration of sedation
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
The duration of sedation is defined as the time (minutes) from the start of the sedative agent administration to patient recovery (alert and able to communicate).
Intraoperatively
Procedural time
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
Procedural time is defined as the time (minutes) from the start of the procedure to last suture.
Intraoperatively
Rapid pacing time
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
Rapid pacing time is defined as the cumulative time (seconds) of rapid ventricular pacing performed during the procedure.
Intraoperatively
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: Postoperatively and up to 30 days
The cumulative length of stay in the cardiac intensive care unit (days) after the procedure.
Postoperatively and up to 30 days
Length of stay
Time Frame: Postoperatively and up to 30 days
The cumulative length of stay in the ward (days) after the procedure.
Postoperatively and up to 30 days
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 hours
Patient satisfaction will be assessed using the Likert satisfaction scale.
24 hours
Cardiologist satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 hours
The satisfaction of the interventional cardiologists performing the procedure will be assessed by the Likert satisfaction scale.
24 hours
Awareness
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
Occurrence of intraoperative awareness of the patient will be assessed using the Michigan Awareness Classification Instrument.
Up to 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paraskevas Tseniklidis, MD, University of Ioannina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Death

Clinical Trials on Continuous infusion of propofol

Subscribe