Comparison of Preoperative Analgesics on the Efficacy of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block.

August 3, 2022 updated by: Farjad Zafar

Comparison of Preoperative Analgesics on the Efficacy of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block on Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: a Double Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.

The purpose of this study is to see how preoperative oral diclofenac sodium, piroxicam, and tramadol affects inferior alveolar nerve block efficacy during root canal treatment of mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

The proposed hypothesis is that the tested drug groups will improve the efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block in comparison to the control group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Standard Operating Procedure:

  • A non-probability consecutive sampling was done in a dental out patient department and 120 patients were included and randomly divided in the 4 groups (n=30) using simple randomization as per the inclusion criteria.
  • A verbal informed consent was taken from each participant before including them in a group.
  • The study was designed to be a double blinded study, where the researchers and the patients both were unaware of the groups of drugs that were used; this anonymity was achieved by marking the groups A, B, C and D on boxes for drugs containing a placebo, diclofenac sodium, piroxicam, and tramadol respectively.
  • The Heft Parker Visual Analogue Scale was used to assess the patients' pain levels prior to the drug ingestion, and the study was continued on the patients that reported moderate to severe pain on the Visual Analogue Scale. On this scale, the pain intensities were categorized as: no pain (0), mild pain (1-54 mm), moderate pain (55- 114 mm) and severe pain (> 114 mm).
  • The patients were then given their respective group of drug/placebo. The patients were instructed to wait for 1 hour before they were administered Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block with 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:100000 epinephrine using a non-aspirating syringe through a long needle of 27-Gauge.
  • Standard root canal treatment was initiated after lip numbness was achieved, and pain levels were reassessed by Heft Parker Visual Analogue Scale during the root canal procedure. However, the patients who did not achieve the numbness of the lips were excluded from the study.
  • Patients who reported discomfort and pain during the endodontic procedure were intervened appropriately; conversely, if the patient did not report any intraoperative pain, endodontic procedure was resumed.
  • Till the end of the data collection process, the collected data forms were stored in a 4 different files labeled A ,B ,C and D respective to the drug groups. On completion of the collection process the data was added and stored as a data file into IBM SPSS Statistics version 25 and further analyzed.

Sample Size Estimation:

The study size was calculated with reference to previous reports, revealing that at least 30 individuals should be included as per the analysis of power of the study. The value of power used was 0.96, the effect size was taken as 0.4, and α was set as 0.05.

Statistical Analysis Plan:

Test of normality will be checked using one sample Shapiro Wilk. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc will be employed if parametric test criteria is met; however if the parametric criteria is not fulfilled, the experimental groups will be compared using Kruskal-Wallis test with post-hoc analysis. The Chi-square test will be used to compare gender and drug groups against the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block efficacy. These tests will be conducted on SPSS Statistics version 25.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 75340
        • Department of Operative Dentistry, Baqai Dental College, Baqai Medical University.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients between the ages of 18 - 65 years.
  • Patients with no medical or systemic conditions.
  • Patients with prolonged pain response on cold pulp testing of 1st and 2nd mandibular molars.
  • Patient with 1st and 2nd mandibular molars having symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with no periapical pathology or tenderness on percussion.
  • Preoperative moderate to severe pain on heft parker visual analogue scale.
  • Patients who can understand the recording of the pain using heft parker visual analogue scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are pregnant and/or breastfeeding.
  • Patients with reported allergy to diclofenac sodium, piroxicam, and tramadol.
  • Patients with periodontal pathologies, necrotized pulp, ankylosed or resorbed roots, open apex and non-restorable tooth.
  • Patients who have taken an analgesic in the past 24 hours.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tramadol
Tramal, 50 mg
Placebo Comparator: Vitamin E
Evion, 400 mg
Experimental: Diclofenac sodium
Voltral SR100, 100 mg
Experimental: Piroxicam
Feldene, 20 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To check the efficacy of preoperative analgesics on inferior alveolar nerve block using Heft-Parker Visual Analogue Scale.
Time Frame: 1 hour

Study's outcome is to evaluate the efficacy of different preoperative oral analgesics on inferior alveolar nerve block during root canal procedure of mandibular teeth using Heft-Parker Visual Analogue Scale on symptomatic irreversible pulpitis patients

Heft-Parker Visual Analogue Scale is a visual assessment tool to record patients pain intensity. This scale is categorized as: no pain (0mm), moderate pain (55-114mm), and severe pain (>114mm)

  • Patients will register their Heft-Parker Visual Analogue Scale recording to the investigator before drug ingestion
  • Patients will re-register their Heft-Parker Visual Analogue Scale 1 hour after the drug ingestion, during root canal procedure after inferior alveolar nerve block
  • The difference in the preoperative and intraoperative Heft-Parker Visual Analogue Scale score will determine the efficacy of different analgesic interventional groups
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Farjad Zafar, BDS, MSc, Assistant Professor and Head of Department of Dental Implantology.
  • Principal Investigator: Maryam Riaz, BDS, Lecturer in Department of Oral Biology.
  • Principal Investigator: Zara Khalid, BDS, House officer.
  • Principal Investigator: Tipu Sultan, BDS, MDS, Assistant Professor in Department of Periodontology.
  • Study Director: Aisha Wali, BDS, MPH, Assistant Professor and Head of Department of Research and Development.
  • Study Chair: Talha M Siddiqui, BDS, MCPS, Professor and Chairman of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 18, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 18, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All collected IPD will be shared with the researchers who have received an ethical approval from their institution/organization through an email.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be made available by November 2022 and will be available for 5 years till October 2027.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who have received an ethical approval from their institution/organization will be provided with the collected IPD.

The data will be sent through an email.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Clinical Trials on Vitamin E

Subscribe