- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05492461
Physician-assisted Dying in Mentally Ill Patients - Which Criteria Are Decisive?
Physician-assisted Dying in Mentally Ill Patients - Which Criteria Are Decisive? An Exploratory Study in the General Population and in the Medical Profession About Physician-assisted Dying in Somatic Versus Mental Illness in Switzerland
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The inclusion criteria for participants from the general population are: (1) between 18 and 65 years old, and (2) sufficient knowledge of German, Italian, or French. Medical professionals are included if they are registered in one of the cantons Basel-Stadt, Basel-Landschaft, Aargau, Lucerne, Graubünden, Ticino or Vaud. Physicians from all specialties are to be surveyed to be able to draw a comparison between the different medical professionals.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Swiss Physicians
A group of approximately 10'000 physicians practicing in the cantons of Basel-Stadt, Basel-Landschaft, Aargau, Lucerne, Graubünden, Ticino and Vaud.
|
General population of Switzerland
A group of 10,000 people from the general population including the three language regions (German, Italian, and French)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Degree of consent to physician-assisted dying in somatic versus mental illness
Time Frame: during the procedure
|
The primary endpoint will be the degree of consent to physician-assisted dying depending on the type of illness (somatic vs. mental) as assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = I disagree; 5 = I agree).
|
during the procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Degree of consent to physician-assisted dying as a function of other factors
Time Frame: during the procedure
|
Degree of consent to physician-assisted dying on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = I disagree; 5 = I agree) scale as a function of
|
during the procedure
|
Positioning of the respondents to the SAMS criteria of 2004, 2018 and 2021.
Time Frame: during the procedure
|
Positioning of the respondents to the SAMS criteria of 2004, 2018 and 2021 as measured through spontaneously expressed opinions in an open answer format in the context of a qualitative evaluation.
|
during the procedure
|
Correlation between the positioning of the respondents on the SAMS criteria of 2004, 2018, and 2021 and the evaluation of the case vignettes
Time Frame: during the procedure
|
Positioning of the respondents on the SAMS criteria as well as the positioning on the case vignettes will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = I disagree; 5 = I agree).
Correlations will be calculated using the participants' ratings on these scales.
|
during the procedure
|
Correlation between the degree of stigmatization and the assessment of physician-assisted dying.
Time Frame: during the procedure
|
The degree of stigmatization will be measured using the Bogardus scale (Bogardus, 1925) as well as the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS).
The Bogardus and SACS scores range from 1 to 4, with 1 representing low degree of consent and 4 a high degree of consent.
The assessment of physician-assisted dying is measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = I disagree; 5 = I agree).
Correlations will be calculated using the participants' scores on the three scales mentioned.
|
during the procedure
|
Comparison of the primary and secondary endpoints between the two groups.
Time Frame: during the procedure
|
The primary endpoint will be the degree of consent to physician-assisted dying depending on the type of illness (somatic vs. mental) as assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = I disagree; 5 = I agree). The secondary endpoint are measured as mentioned in secondary outcome 2-5, and 7. Using the participants' scores on the different scales as indicated, correlations between the different endpoints will calculated to compare the primary and secondary endpoints. |
during the procedure
|
Positioning of the respondents to the SAMS criteria of 2004, 2018 and 2021.
Time Frame: during the procedure
|
Positioning of the respondents to the SAMS criteria of 2004, 2018 and 2021 as measured by the agreement or disagreement when presented SAMS criteria of 2004, 2018 and 2021 on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = I disagree; 5 = I agree)
|
during the procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KZS Seed Grant 11/20
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Physician-Assisted Suicide
-
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)Active, not recruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconCompletedAging | Euthanasia | Assisted Suicide | Qualitative ResearchFrance
-
Klinikum St. Georg gGmbHCompletedIncurable Cancer Diseases | Other Incurable DiseasesGermany
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconMaison Médicale Jeanne GarnierCompletedPalliative Care | End of Life | Euthanasia | Assisted Suicide | Qualitative ResearchFrance
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon; Centre Hospitalier de l'Agglomération... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisAgence de La Biomédecine; Fondation de FranceActive, not recruitingTissue and Organ Procurement | Death, Assisted | Life Support CareFrance
-
Erasmus Medical CenterNot yet recruiting
-
Fuzhou General HospitalRecruitingInfections | COVID-19 | Morality | Death, AssistedChina
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedPhysician Well-being | Physician Job SatisfactionUnited States
-
Fuzhou General HospitalRecruitingInfections | COVID-19 | Morality | Death, AssistedChina