MRI Hypoxia Study for Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Radiation Therapy (MANGO)

May 15, 2026 updated by: University of Sydney

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hypoxia for Radiation Treatment Guidance in Glioblastoma Multiforme (MANGO)

This study is designed to evaluate the role of Oxygen Enhanced (OE) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) MRI in detecting regions of hypoxic tumour and to evaluate their use as imaging methods to selectively deliver targeted radiotherapy to regions of aggressive disease.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The ability to image tumour hypoxia at diagnosis and prior to radiotherapy is extremely important to appropriately adapt radiotherapy plans such that to selectively deliver higher doses of radiation to those more aggressive tumour subregions, thereby improving the chances to achieve better local tumour control. Preoperative imaging of tumour hypoxia also offers the opportunity for 'supra-marginal resections' in surgical planning beyond current neurosurgical standard of care. Additionally, accurately identifying regions of tumour hypoxia harbouring tumour progression at follow up is fundamental in patient follow-up, allowing multidisciplinary teams to more confidently intervene at an earlier stage of tumour recurrence and personalise therapy tailored to the tumour's response to treatment. Routine imaging of tumour hypoxia is currently challenging, as it requires [18F]-Fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO PET) imaging, which is not available in the majority of clinical centres. Today, the availability of accelerated quantitative MRI sequences on clinical MRI systems could enable quantification of tumour hypoxia without putting an unfeasible burden on patients' scan sessions. The next frontier in radiotherapy treatment will use these techniques to identify hypoxic tumour tissues and personalise treatments to the patient's unique tumour biology, maximising the probability of tumour control.

This clinical study will acquire additional images of brain cancer patients. The images will not change the patient's treatment. This study is designed to evaluate the role of oxygen enhanced (OE) MRI and BOLD MRI in detecting regions of hypoxic tumour and to evaluate their use as imaging methods to selectively deliver targeted radiotherapy to regions of aggressive disease.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia, 2065
      • St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia, 2065

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Histopathological diagnosis of a high grade glioma / glioblastoma multiforme

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected high-grade glioma (HGG) / glioblastoma multiforme (WHO grade IV) at initial radiological examination
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0-2
  • Available for scanning on two separate days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women lactating, pregnant or of childbearing potential who are not willing to avoid pregnancy during the study
  • Patients with a history of severe renal disease(s) (eGFR <20) that cannot tolerate gadolinium chelate contrast agents.
  • Geographically remote patients unable to agree to imaging schedule
  • Patients who have received anti - vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monoclonal antibody therapy the 3 months prior to recruitment
  • Patients with a history of psychological illness or condition such as to interfere with the patient's ability to understand the requirements of the study.
  • Patients with significant cardiac or pulmonary disease including cardiac arrythmias or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) that are unable to tolerate high flow O2 for oxygen contrast.
  • Patients taking carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (Acetazolamide)
  • History of glaucoma
  • Any implant, foreign body, 3 Tesla (3T) MRI incompatible device, or other contraindication to MRI imaging.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determination of spatial correlation of hypoxic tumour volume between Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and [18F]-Fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) MRI
Time Frame: 1 year
Spatial correlation between hypoxic tumour volume determined with MRI and 18F-FMISO will be evaluated via measurements of Dice similarity coefficient. Dice similarity coefficients > 0.9 will be considered a strong spatial correlation. Quantitative correlation of voxel-wise levels of hypoxia will be evaluated via measurement of the Spearman's/Pearson's correlation coefficient. Correlation coefficients > 0.7 will be considered a strong correlation.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Repeatability of voxel-wise levels of hypoxia in the tumour
Time Frame: 1 year
Repeatability of voxel-wise levels of hypoxia in the tumour will be assessed by measurements of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).27 ICC values > 0.9 reflect excellent repeatability, good between 0.75 and 0.9, moderate between 0.5 and 0.75, and poor < 0.5. Additionally, similarity between the hypoxia tumour volume (HTV) defined with the MRI biomarker at the two timepoints will be assessed via calculation of Dice similarity coefficient. Dice similarity coefficients > 0.9 will be considered a strong correlation.
1 year
The predicted patient outcomes of the biologically-adapted Radiotherapy (RT) plan will be compared with the actual patient outcomes
Time Frame: 1 year
The predicted patient outcomes of the biologically-adapted RT plan will be compared with the actual patient outcomes following conventional treatment, by using metrics including tumour control probability (TCP) and toxicity measurement to organs at risks and healthy brain (including equivalent uniform dose). Success for this objective will be achieved if the biologically-adapted RT plans result in improved TCP by at least 10% for all patients over conventional treatment, while toxicity metrics remain similar.
1 year
Correlation between the percentage of hypoxic tumour volume and clinical outcome
Time Frame: 1 year
Correlation between the percentage of hypoxic tumour volume and clinical outcome will be evaluated by means of hazard ratio obtained from Cox regression. A hazard ratio > 1 (p<0.05) will indicate that the hypoxic tumour volume increase from 13 weeks post chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and recurrence is associated with worst Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS).
1 year
Correlation between the percentage change of hypoxic tumour volume during treatment and clinical outcome
Time Frame: 1 year
Correlation between the percentage change of hypoxic tumour volume during treatment and clinical outcome will be evaluated by means of hazard ration obtained from Cox regression. A hazard ratio > 1 (p<0.05) will indicate that the increase in hypoxic tumour volume during treatment is associated with worse OS.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Caterina Brighi, University of Sydney

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 14, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After study completion, de-identified (non-coded, non-re-identifiable) data will be available to researchers for further scientific research. Information about data sharing will be provided to study participants in the Patient Information Sheet.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After study completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data stored at the university: In order to download / decompress the stored, de-identified data, participating researchers will agree to the terms of use for the data, including that the data are not to be published or otherwise redistributed without the express consent of the original investigator(s).

Data stored at an external repository: de-identified study data may be provided to an external research data repository, archive or register so that it may be made publicly available for other scientific research. Study data that are provided to an external research data repository will be stored at and managed by the external repository. Data will only be shared with repositories whose function has been reviewed and approved by an accredited Research Integrity/Ethics Committee/Board, under a Materials Transfer Agreement with the University.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glioblastoma Multiforme

Subscribe