The RECSUR-study: Resection Versus Best Oncological Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma (ENCRAM 2302) (RECSUR)

February 21, 2024 updated by: Jasper Gerritsen

The RECSUR-study: Resection Versus Best Oncological Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma: Study Protocol for An International Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (ENCRAM 2302)

Previous evidence has indicated that resection for recurrent glioblastoma might benefit the prognosis of these patients in terms of overall survival. However, the demonstrated safety profile of this approach is contradictory in the literature and the specific benefits in distinct clinical and molecular patient subgroups remains ill-defined. The aim of this study, therefore, is to compare the effects of resection and best oncological treatment for recurrent glioblastoma as a whole and in clinically important subgroups.

This study is an international, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study. Recurrent glioblastoma patients will undergo tumor resection or best oncological treatment at a 1:1 ratio as decided by the tumor board. Primary endpoints are: 1) proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks after surgery and 2) overall survival. Secondary endpoints are: 1) progression-free survival (PFS), 2) NIHSS deterioration at 3 months and 6 months after surgery, 3) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, and 4) frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in each arm. Estimated total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years, follow-up is 1 year.

The study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee (METC Zuid-West Holland/Erasmus Medical Center; MEC-2020-0812). The results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals and disseminated to patient organisations and media.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is an international, multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Eligible patients are operated or receive best oncological treatment with a 1:1 ratio with a sequential computer-generated random number as subject ID. Intraoperative mapping techniques and/or surgical adjuncts can be used in both treatment arms to ensure the safety of the resection (to minimize the risk of postoperative deficits).

Study patients undergo tumor re-resection or receive best oncological treatment and will undergo evaluation at presentation (baseline) and during the follow-up period at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Motor function will be evaluated using the NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) and MRC (Medical Research Council) scale. Language function will be evaluated using a standard neurolinguistic test-battery consisting of the Aphasia Bedside Check (ABC), Shortened Token test, Verbal fluency, Picture description and Object naming. This neurolinguistic test-battery is the result of a consensus between the participating centers. Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). Overall patient functioning with be assessed with the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification system for comorbidities. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) will be assessed with the EQ-5D questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 questionnaires. Overall survival and progression-free survival will be assessed. We expect to complete patient inclusion in 4 years. The estimated duration of the study, including follow-up, will be 5 years.

The primary study objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of re-resection versus best oncological treatment (neurological morbidity and overall survival) in recurrent glioblastoma patients as expressed by NIHSS scores and survival data. Secondary study objectives are to study the overall progressive-free survival (PFS), long-term neurological morbidity (3 months and 6 months postoperatively), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) after resection versus best oncological treatment as expressed by progression on follow up MRI scans based on the RANO criteria24 for tumor progression; NIHSS scores, quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ C30, EORTC QLQ BN20, EQ-5D), and registration of SAEs.

Patients will be recruited for the study from the neurosurgical or neurological outpatient clinic or through referral from general hospitals of the participating neurosurgical hospitals of the ENCRAM Research Consortium, located in Europe and the United States.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

464

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Leuven
        • Contact:
          • Steven De Vleeschouwer, MD PhD
      • Heidelberg, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Heidelberg
        • Contact:
          • Christine Jungk, Dr. med.
      • Munich, Germany
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Technical University Munich
        • Contact:
          • Arthur Wagner, MD
    • Zuid-Holland
      • Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 3015 CE
      • The Hague, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 2261 CP
        • Recruiting
        • Medical Center Haaglanden
        • Contact:
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Not yet recruiting
        • INSELSPITAL Universitatsspital Bern
        • Contact:
          • Philippe Schucht, MD PhD
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, San Francisco
        • Contact:
          • Mitchel Berger, MD PhD
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Recruiting
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Brian Nahed, MD PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with recurrent glioblastoma will be recruited from the neurosurgical or neurological outpatient clinic or through referral from general hospitals of the participating neurosurgical hospitals, located in Europe and the United States. The study is carried out by centers from the ENCRAM Consortium.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years
  2. Tumor recurrence according to the RANO criteria of a previously diagnosed glioblastoma based on the WHO 2021 classification for glioma
  3. The tumor is suitable for resection (according to neurosurgeon)
  4. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Tumors of the cerebellum, brainstem, or midline
  2. Medical reasons precluding MRI (e.g., pacemaker)
  3. Inability to give written informed consent
  4. Secondary high-grade glioma due to malignant transformation from low-grade glioma
  5. Clinical data unavailable for the newly diagnosed setting

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Re-resection
Resection of the recurrent tumor
Resection of the recurrent tumor
Best oncological treatment
Best oncological treatment consisting of re-challenge temozolomide, re-irradiation, experimental therapy, or best supportive care
Re-challenge Temozolomide chemotherapy
Second line chemotherapy with Lomustine
Re-irradiation with single dose, fractionated, or hypofractionated radiation of the recurrent tumor
Experimental phase I therapy with oncolytic virotherapy or immunotherapy (this list is not exhaustive)
Other Names:
  • Immunotherapy
  • Oncolytic virotherapy
Best supportive care, focused on alleviating symptoms

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: Up to 5 years postoperatively
Time from diagnosis to death from any cause
Up to 5 years postoperatively
Neurological morbidity at 6 weeks
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 6 weeks after surgery
6 weeks postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurological morbidity at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months postoperatively
NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 3 months after surgery
3 months postoperatively
Neurological morbidity at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 6 months after surgery
6 months postoperatively
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: Up to 5 years postoperatively
Time from diagnosis to disease progression (occurrence of a new tumor lesions with a volume greater than 0.175 cm3, or an increase in residual tumor volume of more than 25%) or death, whichever comes first
Up to 5 years postoperatively
Residual tumor volume
Time Frame: Within 72 hours postoperatively
Residual tumor volume of the contrast-enhancing and non-contrast enhancing part, as assessed by a neuroradiologist on postoperative MRI scan (T1 with contrast and FLAIR sequences) using manual or semi-automatic volumetric analyses (Brainlab Elements iPlan CMF Segmentation, Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany; or similar software)
Within 72 hours postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ C30)
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire
6 weeks postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ BN20)
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire
6 weeks postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 weeks (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire
6 weeks postoperatively
Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ C30)
Time Frame: 3 months postoperatively
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire
3 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ BN20)
Time Frame: 3 months postoperatively
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire
3 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 3 months (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 3 months postoperatively
Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire
3 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ C30)
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire
6 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ BN20)
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire
6 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 months (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire
6 months postoperatively
Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
Serious Adverse Events within 6 weeks postoperatively
6 weeks postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glioblastoma

Clinical Trials on Re-resection

3
Subscribe