A Retrospective, Observational, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of POLYSITE® and SEESITE® Implantable Ports

August 26, 2022 updated by: Perouse Medical
The purpose of this study is to evaluate performance and safety of POLYSITE® and SEESITE® implantable ports allowing repeated and prolonged access to the venous system for the administration of chemotherapy, antibiotics, antiviral drugs, parenteral nutrition, and for blood transfusion or blood derivatives transfusion.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

250

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Orléans, France, 45100
        • Recruiting
        • CHR d'Orléans
        • Contact:
          • Adel Abou Mrad, MD
      • Suresnes, France, 92150
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Foch
        • Contact:
          • Alexandre Valée, MD
      • Villejuif, France, 94805
        • Recruiting
        • IGR
        • Contact:
          • Frédéric Gomas, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All references of POLYSITE® and SEESITE® implantable ports apply to adult targeted population group.

Only POLYSITE® and SEESITE® implantable ports referenced as 2000 series (micro size) and connected to a 5F catheter apply to paediatric (>10 kg) targeted population groups.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult and paediatric population
  • Patient who received the implantation of any POLYSITE® or SEESITE® implantable port referenced in the Annex 1 of the current protocol between 1-JAN-2018 and 31-DEC-2020

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who refused the data collection according to GDPR regulation applicable in France
  • Patient who received the implantation of another device than those presented in Annex 1 of the current protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance : success of the insertion and placement of the implantable port.
Time Frame: Peri-procedure
evaluation of the success of the insertion and placement of the implantable port.
Peri-procedure
Associate Performance : correct device insertion assess by Radiological endpoint
Time Frame: Peri-procedure
percentage of patients with correct insertion into venous access objectively assessed via radiography, ECG or echography measurement
Peri-procedure
Associate Performance : correct device insertion assess Clinical endpoint
Time Frame: Peri-procedure
percentage of patients with correct placement objectively assessed by clinical observation
Peri-procedure
Per-procedure Safety
Time Frame: 30 Days
evaluation of the safety of the implantable ports
30 Days
Associated Safety : rate of complications
Time Frame: 30 days
measurement of the rate of complications reported during the short-term period of 30 days after the implantation date. As example, the following short-term complications will be looked at: infections, bleeding and hematoma, pneumothorax, hemothorax and pleural effusion, pain.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance : evaluation of the device performance
Time Frame: 5 years
percentage of patients with correct device insertion by the general surgeon, anaesthetist, or the radiologist. The insertion could be done under Echo or under fluoroscopy or ECG
5 years
device failure
Time Frame: 5 years
measurement of the rate of device failure throughout the study until the device is removed from the patient's body. The device failures are defined as mechanical dysfunctions (catheter fracture, occlusion, and port-pocket dehiscence, pinch-off, embolization, leak, port/catheter disconnection, drug extravasation, mal-position, flip-over, migration, local venous thrombosis, etc…).
5 years
Safety: perioperative time
Time Frame: 5 years
duration between the implantation procedure and the first use of the implantable port
5 years
Safety FU period: Device Failure Removal
Time Frame: 5 years
the complications will be followed up to 30 days after the implantable port removal. If the removal is related to a device failure or a complication related to the device, the patient's safety will be followed until the resolution of the complication.the complications will be followed up to 30 days after the implantable port removal. If the removal is related to a device failure or a complication related to the device, the patient's safety will be followed until the resolution of the complication.
5 years
Safety Long Term period: Device Failure Removal
Time Frame: 5 years
the complications will be followed up to 30 days after the implantable duration starting after the first 30 days after the implantation procedure and up to device removal, or patient death, or lost to follow-up, depending on what event comes first in the patient's medical chart. Study timepoints have been defined as 6-months Follow-up after the Implantation procedure, 12-months Follow-up after the Implantation procedure, 24-months Followup after the Implantation procedure and 36-months Follow-up after the Implantation procedure.
5 years
Safety Long Term period: complications
Time Frame: 5 years
measurement of the rate of complications reported during the whole study and at the defined study timepoints. As example, the following long-term complications will be looked at: infections, inflammation, skin disorders, catheter-related venous thrombosis, pinch-off.
5 years
Emergent Risks
Time Frame: 5 years
AEs collection
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PSSS-2021-MULTI

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe