Comparison Between the Quadratus Lumborum Block ,Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lower Abdominal Surgery

August 15, 2025 updated by: Rana Ahmed Abdelghaffar, Fayoum University Hospital

Comparison Between the Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound-guided Unilateral Quadratus Lumborum Block (Lateral Approach) Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Lower Abdominal Surgery

the purpose of study is comparison between the analgesic effect of two techniques in adult lower abdominal surgeries

Study Overview

Detailed Description

the study will be performed from November 2021 to January 2023 at Fayoum University hospital after approval of the local institutional ethics committee and local institutional review board .A detailed informed consent will be signed by the eligible participants before recruitment and randomization.

Preoperative preparations and Premedication :•

Both groups will be assessed by history taking, careful examination ,and laboratory investigations like:

Complete blood count (CBC), coagulation profile:(prothrombin concentration(PC),Partial thromboplastin time(PTT),International Normalized Ratio(INR) ) , kidney function, liver function, ECG for patient >40 years old or indicated cases, specific investigations to each disease

.•the investigators will teach the patients Visual Analogue Score (VAS) and train them.

Intra operative technique and management:

When patients reach Theater, standard American Society of Anesthesiology(ASA) monitoring by (noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP), pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, and capnography) will be applied.

the investigators will allocate basal data for each patient like: heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure and arterial oxygen saturation will be recorded. Intravenous cannulation (IV) and intravenous fluid will be started. Intravenous Midazolam 0.03-0.05 mg/kg will be administered to all patients as premedication, Then the patients undergoing general anesthesia, At the first pre-oxygenation with O2100% for at least 3-5 min then the investigators will start Induction of anesthesia for both groups, general anesthesia will be induced with intravenous injection of fentanyl (1-2 µg/kg) and propofol (1, 5 - 2 mg/kg), and then atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) will be injected for endotracheal intubation. Mechanical ventilation will be maintained by controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) mode with tidal volume ( 6-8ml /kg) with oxygen and air (50:50) with target of EtCo2≈ 30-40 mmHg, anesthesia will be maintained with isoflurane 1%-2% , Incremental dose of atracurium (0.1 mg/kg) will be given every 20 min or when needed. In addition, 0.5μg/kg fentanyl will be given intraoperatively once needed (increase of heart rate or NIBP more than 20% of the basal records) After endotracheal intubation and finishing the operation before awakening of patients the anesthesiologist will perform either the (QL) block technique or the (ESPB) block technique.

Statistical analysis:

The collected data will be organized, tabulated and statistically analyzed using SPSS software statistical computer package version 22 (SPSS Inc, USA). For quantitative data, the mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range will be calculated. Independent-t test or Mann-Whitney U test, when appropriate, will be used as a test of significance. Qualitative data will be presented as number and percentages, chi square (χ2) will be used as a test of significance. For interpretation of results of tests of significance, significance will be adopted at P ≤ 0.05.

Sample size was calculated using (G power version 3). Minimal sample size of patients was 20 in each group needed to get power level 0.90, alpha level 0.05 (two tailed) and effect size of 1.08 for the overall dose of morphine. To overcome problem of loss of follow up, calculated sample size was increased by 20% to reach 24 in each group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Fayoum Governorate
      • Al Fayyūm, Fayoum Governorate, Egypt, 63514
        • Fayoum University hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients age 18-60 years old.
  • Patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgeries
  • ASA classification I, II.
  • Ability to sign the consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Coagulation disorders.
  • Skin lesions or infection at site of proposed needle.
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics, or opioids.
  • Patients suffering from neurological or mental disease.
  • Opioid consumption 48 hours before the operation.
  • Sever Obesity body mass index(BMI) >35
  • Difficulty in Ultrasonographic identification.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: (QL) group
In (QL) group, (lateral Approach) :patient receive this block with 20 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 4mg dexamethasone
20mg of Bupivacaine hydrochloride as local anesthetic will be used in (QL) group and (ESB) group
Other Names:
  • Marcaine 0.25%
high-frequency linear probe covered with sterile sheath Active Array L12-4 (8-13MHz) of an ultrasound machine (Philips clear vue350, Philips Healthcare, Andover MA01810, USA) for performing the blocks .
injection of 4mg dexamethasone in each block
Other Names:
  • Dexamethasone 4mg/ml
22- gauge, 50 mm echogenic needle (Stimuplex D; B Braun, Germany) for performing the blocks .
Active Comparator: (ESB) group
In (ESB) group, Erector Spinae Plane Block: patient receive this block with 20 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 4mg dexamethasone
20mg of Bupivacaine hydrochloride as local anesthetic will be used in (QL) group and (ESB) group
Other Names:
  • Marcaine 0.25%
high-frequency linear probe covered with sterile sheath Active Array L12-4 (8-13MHz) of an ultrasound machine (Philips clear vue350, Philips Healthcare, Andover MA01810, USA) for performing the blocks .
injection of 4mg dexamethasone in each block
Other Names:
  • Dexamethasone 4mg/ml
22- gauge, 50 mm echogenic needle (Stimuplex D; B Braun, Germany) for performing the blocks .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
morphine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after the end of operation
Millie gram
24 hours after the end of operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ease of performance.
Time Frame: during performance of the block
time required to perform the block in minutes .
during performance of the block
Bowel injury
Time Frame: 24hours after operation
yes or no
24hours after operation
intra vascular injection
Time Frame: 24hours after operation
yes or no
24hours after operation
Hematoma formation
Time Frame: 24hours after operation
yes or no
24hours after operation
Pruritus
Time Frame: 24hours after operation
yes or no
24hours after operation
Nausea
Time Frame: 24hours after operation
yes or no
24hours after operation
vomiting
Time Frame: 24hours after operation
yes or no
24hours after operation
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 hours after operation
According to a satisfaction score (poor = zero; fair = one; good = two; excellent= 3).
24 hours after operation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time of first using of analgesic
Time Frame: 24 hours
The time of first use of morphine in hours
24 hours
Visual Analogue Score immediately .
Time Frame: 1 minute post operative
measuring post operative pain level using Visual Analogue Score (VAS) range from (0) no pain to (10) sever pain immediately post operatively
1 minute post operative
Visual Analogue Score at (4)
Time Frame: 4 hour post operative
measuring post operative pain level using Visual Analogue Score (VAS)at(4)hours post operatively
4 hour post operative
Visual Analogue Score at (8)
Time Frame: 8 hours post operative
measuring post operative pain level using Visual Analogue Score (VAS)at(8)hours post operatively
8 hours post operative
Visual Analogue Score at (12)
Time Frame: 12 hours post operative
measuring post operative pain level using Visual Analogue Score at(VAS)(12)hours post operatively
12 hours post operative
Visual Analogue Score at ( 24)
Time Frame: 24 hours post operative
measuring post operative pain level using Visual Analogue Score (VAS)at(24)hours post operatively
24 hours post operative
Age
Time Frame: 1 hour before operation
in years
1 hour before operation
Weight
Time Frame: 1 hour before operation
in kg
1 hour before operation
height
Time Frame: 1 hour before operation
meter
1 hour before operation
BMI
Time Frame: 1 hour before operation
kg/m2
1 hour before operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: rana A. Abdelghaffar, MD, faculty of medicine ,Fayum university

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Abdominal Surgery

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

Subscribe