Epidural Steroids With Intrathecal Nalbuphine for Lower Abdominal Oncologic Surgery

January 7, 2018 updated by: Mansoura University

Epidural Steroids Combined With Intrathecal Nalbuphine: Analgesic and Side Effects Concept in Lower Abdominal Surgical Oncology Procedures

Intraoperative pain, nausea, vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia are known side effects during lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia, Time to 2 segment regression of sensory block and duration of effective analgesia prolonged with intrathecal (IT) 0.4 mg nalbuphine & IT 0.8 mg nalbuphine, but the incidence of side-effects was significantly higher with IT 0.8 mg nalbuphine compared with (IT) 0.4 mg nalbuphine.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

So, the hypothesis of using IT nalbuphine mid away dose 0.6 mg between the best intraoperative analgesic effective dose 0.8 mg and the least side effect producing dose 0.4mg with the addition of epidural dexamethasone could augment the postoperative analgesia and reduce the unwanted side effects. Epidural dexamethasone in a full dose of 8 mg is probably more effective than lower doses to control moderate to severe post-operative pain. Dexamethasone 8mg dose is surgically safe neither produced delayed wound healing nor elevated blood glucose level.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • DK
      • Mansourah, DK, Egypt, 050
        • mansoura university, faculty of medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I or II.
  • Undergoing laparotomy
  • Undergoing oophorectomy
  • Undergoing hysterectomy
  • Undergoing rectal mass excision

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics.
  • General contraindications to spinal anesthesia.
  • Cardiac diseases.
  • Hepatic failure.
  • Renal failure.
  • Respiratory failure.
  • Communication barriers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo-nalbuphine
Epidural injection of normal saline followed with intrathecal injection of 0.6 mg nalbuphine in conjunction with 4 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%
Epidural injection of normal saline followed with intrathecal injection of 0.6 mg nalbuphine in conjunction with 4 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%
Active Comparator: Dexamethasone-nalbuphine
Epidural injection of dexamethasone followed with intrathecal injection of 0.6 mg nalbuphine in conjunction with 4 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%
Epidural injection of dexamethasone followed with intrathecal injection of 0.6 mg nalbuphine in conjunction with 4 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score
Time Frame: For 24 hours after surgery
Pain visual analog score (0: no pain, 100: worst imaginable pain)
For 24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: For 24 hours after surgery
(0: no nausea, 1: nausea, 2: mild vomiting, 3: moderate vomiting, 4: severe vomiting)
For 24 hours after surgery
Sensory recovery
Time Frame: For 5 hours after induction of anaesthesia
Regression to S1 spinal segment as tested with cold sensation
For 5 hours after induction of anaesthesia
Motor recovery
Time Frame: For 5 hours after induction of anaesthesia
The time until decreased a modified Bromage score of 0 (i.e. full leg movement)
For 5 hours after induction of anaesthesia
First analgesic request
Time Frame: For 12 hours after induction of anaesthesia
Time to first request of rescue analgesic
For 12 hours after induction of anaesthesia
Intraoperative heart rate changes
Time Frame: For 3 hours after induction of anaesthesia
Changes in heart rate during surgery
For 3 hours after induction of anaesthesia
Intraoperative mean arterial blood pressure changes
Time Frame: For 3 hours after induction of anaesthesia
Changes in mean arterial blood pressure during surgery
For 3 hours after induction of anaesthesia
Postoperative heart rate changes
Time Frame: For 24 hours after surgery
Changes in heart rate after surgery
For 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative mean arterial blood pressure changes
Time Frame: For 24 hours after surgery
Changes in mean arterial blood pressure after surgery
For 24 hours after surgery
Cumulative use of antiemetic
Time Frame: for 24 hrs after surgery
Cumulative use of metoclopramide and ondansetron after surgery
for 24 hrs after surgery
Cumulative use of rescue intravenous ketorolac
Time Frame: for 24 hrs after surgery
Rescue use of ketorolac in case of severe pain conditions
for 24 hrs after surgery
Cumulative use of rescue intravenous nalbuphine
Time Frame: For 24 hours after surgery
Rescue use of nalbuphine in case of severe pain conditions
For 24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mohamed A Ghanem, MD, assistant professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 7, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Abdominal Oncologic Surgery

Clinical Trials on Placebo-nalbuphine

3
Subscribe