Erector Spinae Plane Block for Peroperative Analgesia and Intraabdominal Tissue Oxygenation (ESPB)

March 19, 2020 updated by: Bezmialem Vakif University

The Evaluation of Ultrasonography-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Perioperative Analgesia and Intraabdominal Tissue Oxygenation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery

Brief summary: Regional anesthesia decreases the need for intravenous analgesia in the peri-operative period. Erector spinae plane (ESP) is a regional anesthesia technique shown to be effective at the dorsal and ventral rami of the thoracic spinal nerve along with sympathetic nerve fibers. The purpose is to demonstrate the contribution of ESP block to the postoperative analgesia by ultrasonography and to increase intraabdominal tissue oxygenation compared to the control group.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

50 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical score I-II were randomly divided into 25 patients in the ESP group and 25 patients in the control group. Patients were premedicated with oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg-1, 30 minutes before surgery Anesthesia monitorization was made with electrocardiogram, non-invasive blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), end-tidal carbon dioxide, temperature, Bispectral index (BIS), and Regional tissue saturation (rSO2). Anesthesia was induced with a face mask distributing 8% sevoflurane and 50% air in oxygen while the patients were breathing spontaneously. After anesthesia induction, peripheral venous access was established and propofol 2 mg kg-1 and fentanyl citrate 1 μg kg-1 were administered. Laryngeal mask airways were used to secure the upper airways. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and 50% air in oxygen. The concentration of sevoflurane was adjusted by targeting BIS scores at 50-60 in all groups. During the operations, fentanyl was administered at a dose of 0.5 μg kg-1 if the blood pressure and heart rates were 20% higher than the baseline value. In ESP blok groups, after general anesthesia induced, patients were placed in the lateral position and ESP block was performed under ultrasound guidance. For ESP block, 1: 1 ratio of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.4 ml / kg of 1% lidocaine was administered. In all groups, regional tissue saturation (RSO2) was evaluated Continuously with near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) probe from anesthesia induction to the end of surgery. Commercially available device (INVOS Cerebral Oximeter; somatics Corp, Troy, Mich) was used to monitor rSO2 values in the surgery side flank during surgical intervention. Pain was evaluated and recorded using the FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale at the 1st, 2nd, 8th, 12th and 24th hours. Total analgesic consumption was recorded during the operation and postoperative time to first analgesic drug and number of patients who required analgesic in the first 24 hours, parents satisfaction score, discharge time as well as adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting were recorded in the postoperative periods.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34093
        • Parvin Pinar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 2 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Children aged 6 months to 2 years
  2. According to American Anesthesia Society Anesthesia Risk Scale ASA I-II class patients
  3. Patients with lower abdominal surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Children under 6 months and older than 2 years
  2. According to American Anesthesia Society Anesthesia Risk Scale Patients with ASA III-IV class
  3. Patients with contraindication to regional anesthesia
  4. Patients with a history of local anesthetic allergy
  5. Patients with abnormal coagulation profile
  6. Patients with infection at the injection site

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ESP Group: Bupivacaine and lidocaine
ESP Group: Bupivacaine and lidocaine: Erector Spinae Plane Block : (1: 1 ratio of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.4 ml / kg of 1% lidocaine) was administered.
ESP block was administered under general anesthesia before the surgery. Patients with ESP block, 1: 1 ratio of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.4 ml / kg of 1% lidocaine
Other Names:
  • ESP block
No Intervention: control group
Control Group:

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FLACC scale
Time Frame: From recovery of anesthesia to end of study ( postoperative 24 hours)
FLACC scale was used. The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale (FLACC) scale was a measurement used to assess pain for children between the ages of 6 months and 2 years or individuals that are unable to communicate their pain. The scale is scored in a range of 0-10 with 0 representing no pain. The scale has five criteria, which are each assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2.
From recovery of anesthesia to end of study ( postoperative 24 hours)
NIRS
Time Frame: Before anesthesia induction to end of operation ( intraoperative 2 hours )
INVOS ;Somatic Corp, Troy, Mic sensors placed in surgical side of patients was used to detect peripheral perfusion and oxygen delivery (rSo2)
Before anesthesia induction to end of operation ( intraoperative 2 hours )

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first analgesic drug
Time Frame: first 24 hour
Time to first analgesic drug will be recorded
first 24 hour
Need for analgesic
Time Frame: first 24 hour
Number of patients who required analgesic in the first 24 hour
first 24 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: PARVIN PINAR, Bezmialem Vakif University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 12, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Abdominal Surgery

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine and Lidocaine

3
Subscribe