Mode of Sedation During Endovascular Treatment of Vertebrobasilar Stroke (MOONRISE)

April 29, 2026 updated by: Prof. Dr. Silvia Schönenberger, MD, University Hospital Heidelberg
Optimal anesthetic mode is not established for patients with vertebrobasilar stroke undergoing endovascular treatment. We want to investigate whether a procedural sedation mode approach is feasible compared to general anesthesia

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Endovascular treatment has become standard of care for many patients with acute ischemic strokes due to large vessel occlusions and is recommended by several national and international guidelines. Several studies have shown that anesthetic modality during endovascular treatment might affect the functional outcome. While much evidence has been generated for ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation, only a few studies have investigated anesthetic modalities in strokes with occlusions of the vertebrobasilar arteries. The majority of patients with vertebrobasilar occlusion strokes undergo endovascular procedure in general anesthesia and not a less burdensome sedation despite the lack of evidence for that approach. A few retrospective studies and a small single-center prospective randomized trial investigating this topic indicate that primary procedural sedation might be a feasible anesthetic approach. Here we aim to provide further high-level evidence by conducting a prospective randomized clinical trial with a PROBE (parallel-group, open-label randomized controlled with blinded endpoint evaluation) design for this research question.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Baden-Wurttemberg
      • Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany, 69120
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Silvia Schönenberger, Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Decision for thrombectomy according to local protocol for acute recanalizing stroke treatment
  2. Age 18 years or older, either sex
  3. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 4
  4. Acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation with isolated or combined occlusion of vertebral artery (VA) and basilar artery (BA)
  5. Informed consent by the patient him-/herself or his/her legal representative obtainable within 72 h of treatment (deferred consenting procedure)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Intracerebral hemorrhage
  2. Coma on admission (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8)
  3. Severe respiratory instability, loss of airway protective reflexes or vomiting on admission, where primary intubation and general anesthesia is deemed necessary
  4. Intubated state before randomization
  5. Severe hemodynamic instability (e.g. due to decompensated cardiac insufficiency)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: General Anesthesia Group
Patients randomized to the GA arm are intubated after anesthetic induction.
Patients randomized to the GA arm are intubated after anesthetic induction. For this purpose, they are pre-oxygenated with an oxygen mask and non-invasive monitoring is established. After sufficient pre-oxygenation has been applied, analgesic and sedative medication are administered. If the patient is sufficiently long nil by mouth they are manually ventilated before a muscle relaxant is administered. A rapid-sequence induction is performed with administration of an opioid, sedative and muscle relaxant in rapid succession and without intermediate manual ventilation in non-nil by mouth patients. To secure the airway, an endotracheal tube is inserted into the trachea with the aid of a laryngoscope. After insertion of the endotracheal tube, its endotracheal position is confirmed with auscultation and capnography. GA maintenance therapy with opioids, sedatives and catecholamines, if needed, will then be started.
Experimental: Procedural Sedation Group
After randomization into the PS arm, the need for analgesics or sedatives are evaluated clinically.
Patients randomized to the GA arm are intubated after anesthetic induction. For this purpose, they are pre-oxygenated with an oxygen mask and non-invasive monitoring is established. After sufficient pre-oxygenation has been applied, analgesic and sedative medication are administered. If the patient is sufficiently long nil by mouth they are manually ventilated before a muscle relaxant is administered. A rapid-sequence induction is performed with administration of an opioid, sedative and muscle relaxant in rapid succession and without intermediate manual ventilation in non-nil by mouth patients. To secure the airway, an endotracheal tube is inserted into the trachea with the aid of a laryngoscope. After insertion of the endotracheal tube, its endotracheal position is confirmed with auscultation and capnography. GA maintenance therapy with opioids, sedatives and catecholamines, if needed, will then be started.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcome as measured by modified Ranking Scale (mRS) after admission.
Time Frame: 90 days +/- 2 weeks
0-6; higher mean worse outcome
90 days +/- 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early neurological improvement indicated by change of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Score 24 hours after admission
Time Frame: [NIHSS on admission - NIHSS after 24 hours]
0-42 points; higher mean worse outcome
[NIHSS on admission - NIHSS after 24 hours]
Mortality
Time Frame: intra-hospital until discharge up to 2 weeks [yes/no] and over the whole follow-up period up to 3 months [time to event]
cerebral or non-cerebral cause of death
intra-hospital until discharge up to 2 weeks [yes/no] and over the whole follow-up period up to 3 months [time to event]
Postinterventional pc-ASPECTS, determined with CT or MRI post-interventional follow up scan
Time Frame: 12-36 hours after admission
semi-quantitative method for grading irreversible ischemia in the vertebrobasilar system; 0-10 points; lower mean higher infarct volumes
12-36 hours after admission
Feasibility of EST
Time Frame: duration of thrombectomy procedure in minutes
e.g. necessity of intubation, cardio-respiratory stability, loss in level of consciousness, loss of cough reflex, vomiting
duration of thrombectomy procedure in minutes
Complications before/during and after EST
Time Frame: duration of the whole hospital stay in days
e.g. severe agitation, loss of level of consciousness, loss of cough reflex, vomiting, cardio-respiratory stability
duration of the whole hospital stay in days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Silvia Schönenberger, MD, University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Principal Investigator: Min Chen, MD, UUHeidelberg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe