- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05525325
Mode of Sedation During Endovascular Treatment of Vertebrobasilar Stroke (MOONRISE)
April 29, 2026 updated by: Prof. Dr. Silvia Schönenberger, MD, University Hospital Heidelberg
Optimal anesthetic mode is not established for patients with vertebrobasilar stroke undergoing endovascular treatment.
We want to investigate whether a procedural sedation mode approach is feasible compared to general anesthesia
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Endovascular treatment has become standard of care for many patients with acute ischemic strokes due to large vessel occlusions and is recommended by several national and international guidelines.
Several studies have shown that anesthetic modality during endovascular treatment might affect the functional outcome.
While much evidence has been generated for ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation, only a few studies have investigated anesthetic modalities in strokes with occlusions of the vertebrobasilar arteries.
The majority of patients with vertebrobasilar occlusion strokes undergo endovascular procedure in general anesthesia and not a less burdensome sedation despite the lack of evidence for that approach.
A few retrospective studies and a small single-center prospective randomized trial investigating this topic indicate that primary procedural sedation might be a feasible anesthetic approach.
Here we aim to provide further high-level evidence by conducting a prospective randomized clinical trial with a PROBE (parallel-group, open-label randomized controlled with blinded endpoint evaluation) design for this research question.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
128
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Min Chen, MD
- Phone Number: 0049/6221/7504
- Email: min.chen@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Study Locations
-
-
Baden-Wurttemberg
-
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany, 69120
- Recruiting
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg
-
Contact:
- Silvia Schönenberger, Dr.
- Phone Number: 0049-6221-5637549
- Email: silvia.schoenenberger@med.uni-heidelberg.de
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Silvia Schönenberger, Dr.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Decision for thrombectomy according to local protocol for acute recanalizing stroke treatment
- Age 18 years or older, either sex
- National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 4
- Acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation with isolated or combined occlusion of vertebral artery (VA) and basilar artery (BA)
- Informed consent by the patient him-/herself or his/her legal representative obtainable within 72 h of treatment (deferred consenting procedure)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Intracerebral hemorrhage
- Coma on admission (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8)
- Severe respiratory instability, loss of airway protective reflexes or vomiting on admission, where primary intubation and general anesthesia is deemed necessary
- Intubated state before randomization
- Severe hemodynamic instability (e.g. due to decompensated cardiac insufficiency)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: General Anesthesia Group
Patients randomized to the GA arm are intubated after anesthetic induction.
|
Patients randomized to the GA arm are intubated after anesthetic induction.
For this purpose, they are pre-oxygenated with an oxygen mask and non-invasive monitoring is established.
After sufficient pre-oxygenation has been applied, analgesic and sedative medication are administered.
If the patient is sufficiently long nil by mouth they are manually ventilated before a muscle relaxant is administered.
A rapid-sequence induction is performed with administration of an opioid, sedative and muscle relaxant in rapid succession and without intermediate manual ventilation in non-nil by mouth patients.
To secure the airway, an endotracheal tube is inserted into the trachea with the aid of a laryngoscope.
After insertion of the endotracheal tube, its endotracheal position is confirmed with auscultation and capnography.
GA maintenance therapy with opioids, sedatives and catecholamines, if needed, will then be started.
|
|
Experimental: Procedural Sedation Group
After randomization into the PS arm, the need for analgesics or sedatives are evaluated clinically.
|
Patients randomized to the GA arm are intubated after anesthetic induction.
For this purpose, they are pre-oxygenated with an oxygen mask and non-invasive monitoring is established.
After sufficient pre-oxygenation has been applied, analgesic and sedative medication are administered.
If the patient is sufficiently long nil by mouth they are manually ventilated before a muscle relaxant is administered.
A rapid-sequence induction is performed with administration of an opioid, sedative and muscle relaxant in rapid succession and without intermediate manual ventilation in non-nil by mouth patients.
To secure the airway, an endotracheal tube is inserted into the trachea with the aid of a laryngoscope.
After insertion of the endotracheal tube, its endotracheal position is confirmed with auscultation and capnography.
GA maintenance therapy with opioids, sedatives and catecholamines, if needed, will then be started.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional outcome as measured by modified Ranking Scale (mRS) after admission.
Time Frame: 90 days +/- 2 weeks
|
0-6; higher mean worse outcome
|
90 days +/- 2 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Early neurological improvement indicated by change of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Score 24 hours after admission
Time Frame: [NIHSS on admission - NIHSS after 24 hours]
|
0-42 points; higher mean worse outcome
|
[NIHSS on admission - NIHSS after 24 hours]
|
|
Mortality
Time Frame: intra-hospital until discharge up to 2 weeks [yes/no] and over the whole follow-up period up to 3 months [time to event]
|
cerebral or non-cerebral cause of death
|
intra-hospital until discharge up to 2 weeks [yes/no] and over the whole follow-up period up to 3 months [time to event]
|
|
Postinterventional pc-ASPECTS, determined with CT or MRI post-interventional follow up scan
Time Frame: 12-36 hours after admission
|
semi-quantitative method for grading irreversible ischemia in the vertebrobasilar system; 0-10 points; lower mean higher infarct volumes
|
12-36 hours after admission
|
|
Feasibility of EST
Time Frame: duration of thrombectomy procedure in minutes
|
e.g.
necessity of intubation, cardio-respiratory stability, loss in level of consciousness, loss of cough reflex, vomiting
|
duration of thrombectomy procedure in minutes
|
|
Complications before/during and after EST
Time Frame: duration of the whole hospital stay in days
|
e.g.
severe agitation, loss of level of consciousness, loss of cough reflex, vomiting, cardio-respiratory stability
|
duration of the whole hospital stay in days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Silvia Schönenberger, MD, University Hospital Heidelberg
- Principal Investigator: Min Chen, MD, UUHeidelberg
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Jadhav AP, Bouslama M, Aghaebrahim A, Rebello LC, Starr MT, Haussen DC, Ranginani M, Whalin MK, Jovin TG, Nogueira RG. Monitored Anesthesia Care vs Intubation for Vertebrobasilar Stroke Endovascular Therapy. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Jun 1;74(6):704-709. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0192.
- Weyland CS, Chen M, Potreck A, Jager LB, Seker F, Schonenberger S, Bendszus M, Mohlenbruch M. Sedation Mode During Endovascular Stroke Treatment in the Posterior Circulation-Is Conscious Sedation for Eligible Patients Feasible? Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 17;12:711558. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.711558. eCollection 2021.
- Schonenberger S, Henden PL, Simonsen CZ, Uhlmann L, Klose C, Pfaff JAR, Yoo AJ, Sorensen LH, Ringleb PA, Wick W, Kieser M, Mohlenbruch MA, Rasmussen M, Rentzos A, Bosel J. Association of General Anesthesia vs Procedural Sedation With Functional Outcome Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2019 Oct 1;322(13):1283-1293. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11455.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 1, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2029
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 30, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
September 1, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 30, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 29, 2026
Last Verified
April 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MOONRISE
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.