Soluble VE-cadherin in Prediction and Diagnosis of Early Postoperative Hypoxemia After Cardiopulmonary Bypass

December 4, 2022 updated by: Zhuan Zhang

Soluble Vascular Endothelial-cadherin in Prediction and Diagnosis of Early Postoperative Hypoxemia After Cardiopulmonary Bypass

More than 2 million patients worldwide receive heart surgery every year, majority of these surgical patients will undergo cardiopulmonary bypass. However, the incidence of postoperative acute lung injury due to cardiopulmonary bypass is still as high as 20% to 35%. According to clinical experience, the earlier lung damage is detected, the more successful the treatment will be. On the basis of traditional detection, the investigators found a new indicator, serum soluble vascular endothelial-cadherin, which are easy to obtain and have certain specificity. Importantly, they can predict postoperative acute lung injury within 1 hour after cardiac surgery. It is meaningful that this indicator can provide clinicians with early decision-making advice and immediate treatment for patients who may be at risk.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 225000
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Underwent cardiac surgery using CPB technology.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's lack of consent to participate;
  • Presence of abnormal liver, kidney or other organ function;
  • Pulmonary inflammation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or tumors;
  • Underwent cardiac surgery without CPB technology;
  • Postoperative need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Lung injury group
Lung injury is defined as lung damage when the patient has an oxygen and index below 300 24 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass
Laboratory parameters of all postoperative patients including blood cell analysis, blood gas surveillance, liver, and kidney function alone with chest radiograph and echocardiography were dynamically monitored.
Sham Comparator: Non-lung injury group
Patients with oxygen and an index above 300 24 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass are defined as non-lung injury
Laboratory parameters of all postoperative patients including blood cell analysis, blood gas surveillance, liver, and kidney function alone with chest radiograph and echocardiography were dynamically monitored.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PaO2/FiO2 ratio
Time Frame: Day 1 after CPB, Day 2 after CPB
The ratio of inspiratory oxygen fraction to oxygen pressure (PaO2/FiO2) was calculated
Day 1 after CPB, Day 2 after CPB
lung-injury scores
Time Frame: Day 1 after CPB, Day 2 after CPB

A structured tutorial was used to establish consensus in the interpretation of radiographs for radiographic lung-injury scores, range from 0 to 4.

0: No alveolar consolidation; 1: Alveolar consolidation confined to 1 quadrant; 2: Alveolar consolidation confined to 2 quadrants 3: Alveolar consolidation confined to 3 quadrants; 4: Alveolar consolidation in all 4 quadrants.

The higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Day 1 after CPB, Day 2 after CPB

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Clinical Trials on blood cell analysis, blood gas surveillance, chest radiograph and echocardiography

Subscribe