Effect of ASI on Sensory, Motor, Cognitive, Behavioral Skills and Social Participation in Children With ADHD (ASI-ADHD)

September 30, 2024 updated by: Busra Kaplan Kilic, Hacettepe University

Effect of Ayres Sensory Integration Therapy on Sensory, Motor, Cognitive, Behavioral Skills and Social Participation in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a very common neurodevelopmental disorder in childhood characterized by short attention span, impulsivity and hyperactivity. It is also known that sensory integration problems are seen together with the basic symptoms of ADHD. Studies indicate that children with ADHD have difficulties in perceiving and processing sensory stimuli, and in relation to this, they have difficulty in producing appropriate sensory responses at school, at home and in social environments. However, it was observed that the interventions related to ADHD did not focus on the sensory-motor dimension enough, and focused more on cognitive or social skills. Although current research indicates the presence of sensory integration disorder in children with ADHD, there are no studies showing the effectiveness of sensory integration intervention. Our study was planned to examine the effect of Ayres Sensory Integration intervention on sensory-motor, cognitive, behavioral skills and social participation in children with ADHD. Materials and Methods: After the evaluation, 90 children with ADHD will be included in the study by dividing them into intervention (n=45) and control (n=45) groups by simple randomization method. Ayres Sensory Integration Therapy intervention will be applied to the intervention group for 10 weeks, 3 times a week, with a session duration of 1 hour, while the control group will continue the drug treatment and after a waiting period of 10 weeks, Ayres Sensory Integration Therapy will be applied after the second evaluation. Participants, Sensory Profile (SP), Sensory Integration and Praxis Test (SIPT), Emotion Regulation Checklist (ERC), Stroop Test TBAG Form (Stroop TBAG), Childhood Executive Functions Inventory (CHEXI), Participation and Environment Scale for Children and Adolescents (PEM-CY), Conners Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS), Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS), Bruininks-Oseretsky Motor Proficiency Test-2 (BOT-2) and Goal Achievement Scale (GAS) both before and before intervention. and post-group change as well as between-group differences will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Although there are studies in the literature showing the presence of Sensory Integration Disorder (SID) in children with ADHD, most researchers have studied a similar profile, such as sensory modulation disorder, and few have investigated all components of sensory integration (such as sensory perception, praxis). More research is needed to confirm the effects of Ayres Sensory Integration (ASI) therapy in children with ADHD and the possible relationship between SID-based difficulties in activities of daily living and ADHD symptoms. In our study, it was aimed to investigate the effect of Ayres Sensory Integration therapy on sensory, motor, cognitive, behavioral and social participation in children with ADHD in the light of extensive literature and recommendations.

ASI therapy will be applied to the intervention group, and the first assessment will be applied to the control group and the second assessment will be made 10 weeks later. However, after a 10-week waiting period, ASI therapy intervention will be applied after the second evaluation so that the children in the control group can also benefit from the intervention. ASI therapy intervention will be applied for 10 weeks, 3 times a week, with a session duration of 1 hour. Inclusion criteria: Being diagnosed with ADHD according to the DSM-V criteria, taking medication, being between the ages of 6 and 8 and attending school. Exclusion criteria: Having previously received sensory integration therapy, having another diagnosis in addition to the ADHD diagnosis.

In addition to drug therapy, ASI therapy will be applied to children in the intervention group. In the intervention group, ASI therapy will be performed 3 days a week for a total of 10 weeks, 60 minutes each session, in accordance with the Ayres Sensory Integration Fidelity Measure (ASI-FM). A manualized protocol will be followed based on the principles of ASI-FM, Ayres sensory integration.

The children in the control group will be given only drug treatment. The second evaluation will be repeated 10 weeks after the first evaluation. In order for the children in the control group to benefit from sensory integration therapy, after a 10-week waiting period, after the result measurements are applied again, ASI therapy will be applied 3 days a week with 60 minutes each session in accordance with the Ayres Sensory Integration Fidelity Measure (ASI-FM).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Altındağ
      • Ankara, Altındağ, Turkey, 06230
        • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • According to the DSM-V criteria diagnosed with ADHD-C type,
  • To be on medication,
  • To be between the ages of 6 and 8,
  • To attend school.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having previously received sensory integration therapy,
  • Having another diagnosis in addition to the ADHD diagnosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ayres Sensory Integration Therapy Group
Ayres Sensory Integration (ASI) therapy will be applied to children in the intervention group. In the intervention group, Ayres Sensory Integration Therapy will be performed 3 days a week for a total of 10 weeks, 60 minutes each session, in accordance with the Ayres Sensory Integration Fidelity Measure (ASI-FM). A manualized protocol will be followed based on the principles of ASI-FM, Ayres sensory integration.
Ayres sensory integration theory provides evidence from basic and applied science about the ability to receive, sort, process, and make use of the information originating from the body and the environment and perceived by our senses (touch, gravity, body position and movement, sight, smell, hearing, taste). This sensory information goes to the brain, where it is organized and interpreted. As a result, we form a plan of action that allows us to have an adaptive response appropriate for the demands of the environment. A thorough assessment guides the preparation of goals addressing the referring concerns and the recommendations for intervention. Ayres Sensory Integration intervention is provided within the context of professional practice. It is designed to improve sensory perceptual abilities, self-regulation, motor skills, and praxis. In doing so, it supports the client's ability to show improved behavior, learning, and social participation.
No Intervention: Waiting Group
The children in the control group will be wait just 10 weeks. The second evaluation will be repeated 10 weeks after the first evaluation. In order for the children in the control group to benefit from sensory integration therapy, after a 10-week waiting period, after the result measurements are applied again, Ayres sensory integration therapy will be applied 3 days a week with 60 minutes each session in accordance with the Ayres Sensory Integration Fidelity Measure (ASI-FM).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensory Integration and Praxis Test (SIPT)
Time Frame: SIPT will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. SIPT measures the change in sensory skills.Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
Developed by Ayres, is a standardized performance-based observational test that evaluates sensory perception and sensory perception-based skills in detail in children between the ages of 4 and 8 years and 11 months. SIPT, is one of the important gold tests in evaluating sensory development.
SIPT will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. SIPT measures the change in sensory skills.Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
Bruininks-Oseretsky Motor Proficiency Test-2 (BOT-2)
Time Frame: BOT-2 will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. BOT-2 measures the change in motor skills. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
Bruininks-Oseretsky Motor Proficiency Test-2 (BOT-2) is a test developed for children aged 4-21 and developed to measure the motor functions of children. BOT-2 is an observational assessment evaluating motor performance, consisting of 8 subtests and 12 items in total. It consists of fine motor accuracy, fine motor integration, dexterity, bilateral coordination, balance, upper extremity coordination, endurance, speed and agility subtests.
BOT-2 will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. BOT-2 measures the change in motor skills. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Time Frame: GAS will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. GAS measures the change in behavior. Maximum +2 and minimum -2 points are taken. +2 means the best result.
The Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) is used to evaluate the achievement of functional therapy goals in children receiving treatment in pediatric services. It helps to set priorities and clear goals for intervention. It provides the child's continuous interest in the set goals and offers a person-centered approach. The determined goals should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and well-timed. While applying GAS, goals are set for the child and possible outcomes are defined for each goal. After a certain intervention, the functional status of the child is determined again. GAS consists of 5 points as -2, -1, 0, +1 and +2. A score of -2 indicates the child's pre-intervention baseline level, a score of -1 indicates a development below the expected attainment level, a score of 0 indicates an expected attainment level, a score of +1 indicates a better-than-expected achievement, and a score of +2 indicates that the child performs much better than expected.
GAS will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. GAS measures the change in behavior. Maximum +2 and minimum -2 points are taken. +2 means the best result.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroop Test TBAG Form (Stroop TBAG)
Time Frame: Stroop TBAG will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. Stroop TBAG measures the change in cognitive skills. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
The Stroop Test TBAG Form (Stroop TBAG) is one of the golden tests used to measure selective attention and ability to shift attention, focusing on the color used in the spelling of the word and the disruptive effect of the color in the pronunciation of the word.
Stroop TBAG will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. Stroop TBAG measures the change in cognitive skills. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
Emotional Regulation Checklist (ERC)
Time Frame: ERC will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. The test provides subjective data about emotional regulation behaviour in child. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
The Emotional Regulation Checklist (ERC) is a 24-item scale developed by Shields and Cicchetti to evaluate the emotion regulation competence of children aged 6-13 and can be evaluated by both parents and teachers.
ERC will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. The test provides subjective data about emotional regulation behaviour in child. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
Childhood Executive Functions Inventory (CHEXI)
Time Frame: CHEXI will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. The test provides subjective data about executive functions skills in child. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
Childhood Executive Functions Inventory (CHEXI) is a scale consisting of 26 questions for children aged 4-12 years, developed by Lisa B. Thorell and Lilianne Nyberg as a measurement focusing especially on executive functions.
CHEXI will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. The test provides subjective data about executive functions skills in child. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
Participation and Environment Scale for Children and Youth (PEM-CY)
Time Frame: PEM-CY will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. The test provides subjective data about participation area in child. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
The Participation and Environment Scale for Children and Youth (PEM-CY) is a 28-item questionnaire assessing participation in children aged 5-17 years. It is a family-reported scale that questions the child's participation in school, home and society.
PEM-CY will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. The test provides subjective data about participation area in child. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensory Profile (SP)
Time Frame: SP will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. The test provides subjective data. The results are interpreted as exact difference, probable difference and typical performance.
The Sensory Profile (SP) is a family-reported scale that provides data on children's reactions to sensory events in daily life, how sensory behaviors can contribute to performance in daily life, and what difficulties they cause in performance. It consists of 125 questions that can be applied between the ages of 3-10.
SP will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. The test provides subjective data. The results are interpreted as exact difference, probable difference and typical performance.
Conners Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS)
Time Frame: CTRS will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. The test provides subjective by teacher data about child school behaviour. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
Conners Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS) is important behavioral screening and diagnostic scales that have a wide range between the ages of 3-17 and are used quite frequently especially in ADHD. CTRS consists of 28 items developed to grade students' classroom behaviors by their teachers.
CTRS will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. The test provides subjective by teacher data about child school behaviour. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS)
Time Frame: CPRS will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. The test provides subjective by parent data about child general behaviour. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.
Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) is important behavioral screening and diagnostic scales that have a wide range between the ages of 3-17 and are used quite frequently especially in ADHD. CPRS consists of 48 items developed to child behavior.
CPRS will also be used in the initial and final assessment at week 1 and week 12. The test provides subjective by parent data about child general behaviour. Getting a high score on the test means good performance.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 29, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 18, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe