Perioperative Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)

December 23, 2025 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

A Pilot Trial of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Technology in Preoperative Assessment Clinic

To evaluate use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology in the preoperative setting: evaluate feasibility of placement of CGM during preoperative clinic visit with intent to utilize CGM throughout perioperative period.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

To further study potential barriers related to loss of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data as it relates to use of electrocautery and grounding devices utilized in the perioperative setting. To assess how CGM technology could improve glycemic management in the perioperative setting, specifically in predicting and preventing hypoglycemic episodes as well as utilization for treating hyperglycemia with resultant improvement in patient morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and overall quality of life. CGM technology aids tremendously in data collection with recognition of glycemic patterns, as well as evaluating prediction of blood glucose changes including both hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic events. The availability of such a large volume of glycemic data has been shown to make a tremendous impact in patient care, resulting in statistically significant reductions in hemoglobin A1c, a decrease in hypoglycemia, a decrease in hospital admissions for diabetes complications, and improved overall quality of life and fear of hypoglycemia in patients using CGM technology.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants that are 18 years of age or older with hyperglycemia and/or diabetes mellitus who will be undergoing surgery at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
  • smartphone compatible with Libre 2 phone application

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women will not be excluded from this study
  • Participants undergoing surgery that would limit the placement of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) to the posterior aspect of the upper extremity will be excluded from this study
  • neurosurgical type of surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Continuous Glucose Monitor
CGM placed preoperative to monitor blood glucose and insulin correction to achieve perioperative glucose management
Perioperative glucose management beginning preoperative through postoperative monitoring
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
no study intervention-conventional glucose management per subjects medical providers as standard of care
no study intervention. participant follows current medical providers recommendations for glucose management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disparities in Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Accuracy - Fingerstick Values
Time Frame: Day 7
Accuracy of CGM technology utilizing Dexcom G6 CGM and Freestyle Libre 2.0 CGM in the perioperative setting for glycemic management of patients with hyperglycemia and/or diabetes mellitus compared with current standard of care utilizing point of care blood glucose fingerstick Glucose values - Only Glucometers
Day 7
Disparities (Percentage Difference) in Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Accuracy - Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) / Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP)/ Blood Gas Values - Overall Number of Unit Analyzed (Glucose Values Each Group)
Time Frame: Day 7
Accuracy of CGM technology utilizing Dexcom G6 CGM and Freestyle Libre 2.0 CGM in the perioperative setting for glycemic management of patients with hyperglycemia and/or diabetes mellitus compared with current standard of care utilizing serum and arterial glucose values - Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) / Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP)/ blood gas values For each CMP/BMP/Blood Gas Value recorded in the Electronic Medical Record during the period of CGM wear, a percentage difference was calculated between the measured glucose value and the corresponding CGM value.
Day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients With Functioning Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) - Arrived on Their Date of Surgery (DOS) With Working CGM
Time Frame: Day 7
Proportion of patients who present on day of surgery with CGM still in place and functioning
Day 7
Disparities in Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Accuracy - Interference Amount
Time Frame: Hour 24
Analysis of potential electrocautery interference in CGM data collection was performed through visual review of the CGM glucose data graphs for unexpected gaps or spikes during surgery. No such events were observed in the CGM outputs during the review. Disparities in CGM accuracy due to interference were reported as 0%.
Hour 24

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Satisfaction Scores
Time Frame: Day 7
A patient satisfaction survey will be collected to further evaluate the patient's perspective of wearing a CGM in the perioperative period
Day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susan Vishneski, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 21, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 21, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Continuous Glucose monitor

Subscribe