Effect of Virtual Reality on Pain and Function in Children With Sickle Cell Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

June 15, 2025 updated by: Afnan Bkri

The Effect of Virtual Reality on Pain, Physical Function, and Health-related Quality of Life in Children With Sickle Cell Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Significance or rationale of the study:

Virtual reality (VR) is a promising non-pharmacological pain management tool. It enhances motor function by promoting cortical reorganization and neuroplasticity. Its multimodal biofeedback engages sensory and cognitive functions, making therapy interactive, motivating, and easy to understand. With strong rehabilitation potential, VR helps patients adapt to real-world movements (Laver, 2020). Initially used for procedural pain management, VR is now expanding into chronic pain rehabilitation by encouraging engagement with difficult or avoided movements (Griffin et al., 2020). Additionally, VR offers a dynamic alternative to traditional exercises, improving adherence and outcomes. Integrating entertainment into therapy can motivate children, enhancing their physical and psychological well-being. Recently, a few studies revealed an improvement in vaso-occlusive episodes (VOE) after VR treatment (Agrawal et al., 2019). However, efficacy studies are needed to assess VR's potential benefits. Additionally, data regarding VR's efficacy on daily pain, functional mobility, and HRQOL as complementary therapy are limited

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

  1. To investigate the effect of VR in reducing daily pain in children with SCD
  2. To evaluate the impact of VR on improving functional mobility in children with SCD.
  3. To examine the changes in PedsQL in children with SCD after engaging in VR experiences.
  4. To evaluate the safety and satisfaction of fully immersive VR therapy in children with

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Jazan, Saudi Arabia, 45142
        • Prince Mohammed bin Nasser Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Children aged between 8 and 13 years.
  2. Diagnosed with sickle cell disease (SCD), including homozygous SCA and other clinically confirmed variants.
  3. Medically stable and cleared by the treating physician to participate in mild activity.
  4. Receiving hydroxyurea as part of routine care.
  5. Able to follow simple instructions and communicate pain levels.
  6. Parental/legal guardian consent and child assent obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presentence of developmental, neurological, or genetic disorders.
  2. History of hip replacement or major orthopedic conditions affecting mobility.
  3. Current acute chest syndrome or unstable clinical condition.
  4. Visual or hearing impairments that would interfere with VR use.
  5. Participation in concurrent physiotherapy or rehabilitation programs.
  6. Previously enrolled in phase one of the current study (if applicable)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: virtual reality treatment
Participants assigned to this arm received a fully immersive virtual reality (VR) exercise program. The intervention consisted of a series of interactive physical therapy games designed to improve functional mobility, joint movement, balance, and pain management. Sessions were conducted at home over five weeks using an Oculus Quest 2 headset and KindVR Aqua software. Each session lasted 15 minutes and was supervised weekly by a pediatric physical therapist through follow-up communication.
Virtual reality (VR) technology is a new medical intervention technique founded on the principle of distraction, providing real perceptual stimuli such as visual images, spatial sounds, tactile, and sensory feedback stimuli.(Zhang et al., 2022)
No Intervention: Standard Care Group
Participants in this group received standard care without any additional VR-based interventions. They continued with their usual medical management and home routines as prescribed by their healthcare providers. No structured exercise or virtual therapy was provided during the study period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity (Numeric Rating Scale - NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 5
Pain intensity was assessed using the validated Arabic version of the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Participants were asked to rate their pain immediately before and after the VR session to measure the short-term analgesic effect of the intervention.
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 5

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-Related Quality of Life (PedsQL)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 5
The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Generic Core Scale was used to assess health-related quality of life in children aged 8-13 years. The Arabic validated version was administered at baseline, mid-intervention (week 3), and post-intervention (week 5). Higher scores indicate better quality of life across physical, emotional, social, and school functioning domains.
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 5
Functional Mobility (Timed Up and Go Test - TUG)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 5
Functional mobility was measured using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Participants were instructed to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down. The total time taken to complete the task was recorded in seconds. Assessments were conducted at baseline, week 3, and week 5.
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: afaf Ah shaheen, PHD, King Saud University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 29, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified IPD including pain scores and outcome measures will be available upon reasonable request with appropriate ethical approval.

De-identified individual participant data (IPD), including pain scores and functional outcomes, will be made available upon reasonable request. Supporting documents such as the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, clinical study report, and analytic code will also be provided. Data will be shared through institutional data-sharing agreements and with approval from the responsible ethics committee. Availability is expected within 6 months following publication.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documents will be made available beginning 6 months after publication of the main findings. Data will remain accessible for up to 3 years following the date of publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers affiliated with academic institutions or healthcare organizations may request access to de-identified IPD and supporting documents (study protocol, SAP, CSR, and analytic code). Requests must include a data use agreement and be reviewed and approved by the institutional ethics committee. Approved data will be shared securely via institutional platforms or encrypted file transfer.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Study Data/Documents

  1. Statistical Analysis Plan
    Information identifier: PMID: 11561673

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SCD

Clinical Trials on virtual reality

Subscribe