Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Usual Care for ED Patients With Mechanical Back Pain

August 1, 2023 updated by: Ben Ho, Island Health

Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Usual Care for ED Patients With Mechanical Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the Erector Spinae plane (ESP) block, a nerve block, to usual care in emergency department patients with back pain. The main question it aims to answer:

Is the ESP block superior to usual care in the treatment of back pain in the emergency department? Participants will be randomly assigned to the ESP or the usual care group. Pain improvement at the time of emergency department discharge will be compared.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada, V9S2B7
        • Nanaimo Regional General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Patients deemed to have mechanical back pain with a component of paravertebral tenderness or paravertebral spasm reported by the patient or noted on examination by treating physician.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous recipient of erector spinae plane block
  • exam concerning for cauda equina syndrome
  • current IV drug use
  • organ transplant recipient
  • history of or suspected bleeding diathesis
  • current use of anticoagulants
  • sepsis or soft tissue infection at site of the block within last three months
  • pregnancy
  • overt malignancy involving skin or underlying soft tissue at the site of block
  • allergy to any of the research medications
  • inability to participate in telephone follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ESP cohort
Randomized to receive the ultrasound-guided ESP block.
Utilizing the in line approach, a 22 gauge 3.5" spinal needle was guided the the tip of the transverse process corresponding to the area of maximal tenderness or central to the reported area of spasm. 1% lidocaine with epinephrine was used for skin anaesthesia and for hydro-localization of the needle tip on approach to the tip of the transverse process. Once the needle tip made contact with the transverse process, 2-3 ml of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine was injected to open the ESP plane. If there was no reported tachycardia after approximately 45 seconds, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivicaine was injected into the ESP plane.
Active Comparator: Usual care cohort
Randomized to usual care as dictated by the treating emergency physician
Analgesia as dictated by the treating emergency physician

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Verbal Pain Score (NVPS) reduction at emergency department discharge
Time Frame: Numeric verbal pain score (NVPS) at time of randomization compared with NVPS at time of discharge from the emergency department up to 24 hours after randomization.
The NVPS is an 11-point verbal pain scale from 0 to 10 with 0 representing no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable.
Numeric verbal pain score (NVPS) at time of randomization compared with NVPS at time of discharge from the emergency department up to 24 hours after randomization.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients requiring post randomization Emergency department (ED) opiate analgesia analgesia use
Time Frame: Time of randomization to time of ED discharge up to 24 hours after randomization.
Opiate medication dose and route of administration was recorded
Time of randomization to time of ED discharge up to 24 hours after randomization.
Emergency department (ED) length of stay.
Time Frame: Time of ED triage to time of ED discharge up to 24 hours after triage.
Time spent in the emergency department.
Time of ED triage to time of ED discharge up to 24 hours after triage.
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score reduction from baseline
Time Frame: Time of randomization compared to 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post Emergency department visit
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is widely used to measure a patients' pain intensity and interference the pain has on daily function measured in 7 categories: mood, work, general activity, walking, relationships, enjoyment of life, and sleep. The patient rates each of these on a scale from 0-10with 0 representing no interference and 10 complete interference in that aspect of life. The initial BPI was recorded at time of randomization and subsequent BPI's recorded by telephone follow-up at predetermined time intervals
Time of randomization compared to 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post Emergency department visit
Number of patients requiring post Emergency department discharge opiate analgesia use
Time Frame: Date of randomization to 1 day after randomization, 1 day after randomization to 1 week after randomization, 1week after randomization to 1 month after randomization, 1 month after randomization to 3 months after randomization.
During telephone follow up, patients were asked if there was any opiate analgesia used during the pre-determined time period.
Date of randomization to 1 day after randomization, 1 day after randomization to 1 week after randomization, 1week after randomization to 1 month after randomization, 1 month after randomization to 3 months after randomization.
Post Emergency department (ED) discharge Numeric Verbal Pain Score (NVPS)
Time Frame: 1 day after randomization, 1 week after randomization, 1 month after randomization, 3 months after randomization.
At telephone follow up at predetermined time intervals, patients were asked what their most severe level of pain they were currently experiencing as measured by the NVPS
1 day after randomization, 1 week after randomization, 1 month after randomization, 3 months after randomization.
Number of patients able to ambulate post ED treatment if unable to on ED admission
Time Frame: Time of ED triage compared to time of ED discharge up to 24 hours after triage.
If patient was unable to ambulate on ED admission, did ED treatment allow ambulation without assistance: yes or no
Time of ED triage compared to time of ED discharge up to 24 hours after triage.
Number of patients requiring Emergency department (ED) return visits for back pain
Time Frame: Date of randomization to 1 day after randomization, 1 day after randomization to 1 week after randomization, 1week after randomization to 1 month after randomization, 1 month after randomization to 3 months after randomization.
At telephone follow up at predetermined intervals, patients were asked if they had to return subsequently to the emergency department due to their back pain
Date of randomization to 1 day after randomization, 1 day after randomization to 1 week after randomization, 1week after randomization to 1 month after randomization, 1 month after randomization to 3 months after randomization.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 16, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 16, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae plane block using 20 ml of bupivicaine 0.25%

Subscribe