NMDA-enhancing Treatment for Cognitive Dysfunction of Schizophrenia

October 18, 2023 updated by: China Medical University Hospital

NMDA-enhancing Treatment for Cognitive Dysfunction of Schizophrenia Patients During Symptomatic Remission

Cognitive impairment, the core psychopathology of schizophrenia, usually persists in schizophrenia patients even during symptomatic remission. While cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) is an important therapeutic target, hypofunction of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) is a key factor of CIAS. This study aims to examine the efficacy and safety of an NMDA-enhancer (NMDAE) for the treatment of CIAS in schizophrenia patients during symptomatic remission.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Cognitive impairment, the core psychopathology and the outcome determinant of schizophrenia, usually persists in schizophrenia patients even during symptomatic remission. Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) is an important therapeutic target; and hypofunction of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) is a key factor of CIAS. Whether NMDAR-enhancing treatment can truly improve cognitive function needs to be tested in schizophrenia patients during symptomatic remission. This study aims to examine the efficacy and safety of an NMDA-enhancer (NMDAE) for the treatment of CIAS in schizophrenia patients during symptomatic remission.

The subjects are the patients with schizophrenia during symptomatic remission. They keep their original treatment and are randomly, double-blindly assigned into two treatment groups for 12 weeks: (1) NMDAE, or (2) placebo. At weeks 0 and 12, 7 cognitive domains will be measured. At weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12, Global Assessment of Function, Quality of Life Scale, various clinical-symptom rating scales, and side effects scales will be measured too.

Chi-square (or Fisher's exact test) will be used to compare differences of categorical variables and t-test (or Mann-Whitney test if the distribution is not normal) for continuous variables between treatment groups. Mean changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments will be assessed using the generalized estimating equation (GEE). All p values for clinical measures will be based on two-tailed tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Hsien-Yuan Lane, M.D., Ph.D
  • Phone Number: 11855 886 4 22052121
  • Email: hylane@gmail.com

Study Locations

      • Taichung, Taiwan
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Hsien-Yuan Lane, M.D., Ph.D
          • Phone Number: 11855 886 4 22052121
          • Email: hylane@gmail.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5 -TR) diagnosis of schizophrenia
  • Fulfill the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) criteria for remission (Andreasen et al., 2005): each of eight items (delusions, unusual thought content, hallucinatory behavior, conceptual disorganization, mannerisms/posturing, blunted affect, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, and lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation) in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (Kay et al., 1987) scoring 3 or lower for 6 months or longer; in addition, have a baseline total score of 59 or lower in the PANSS
  • Are physically healthy and laboratory assessments (including blood routine, biochemical tests) are clinically insignificant;
  • Have been keeping a fixed dose of antipsychotics (excluding clozapine) for at least 6 months, and that is not allowed to change during the 12-week study period
  • Have sufficient education to communicate effectively and are capable of completing the assessments of the study
  • Agree to participate in the study and provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • DSM-5-TR diagnosis of intellectual disability or substance (including alcohol) use disorder
  • History of epilepsy, head trauma, or serious medical or central nervous system diseases (other than schizophrenia) which may interfere with the study
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Inability to follow protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Use of placebo as a comparator
Experimental: NMDAE
An NMDA enhancer
Use of an NMDA enhancer for the treatment of CIAS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of cognitive function composite
Time Frame: Week 0, 12

Ten tests for assessment of 7 cognitive domains:

  1. speed of processing (assessed by Category Fluency, Trail Marking A, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale(WAIS)-III Digit Symbol-Coding)
  2. sustained attention (Continuous Performance Test)
  3. working memory: verbal (digit span) and nonverbal (spatial span)
  4. verbal learning and memory (WMS-III, word listing)
  5. visual learning and memory (WMS-III, visual reproduction)
  6. reasoning and problem solving (WISC-III, Maze)
  7. social cognition (MSCEIT Version 2)

For the domain (a. and c.) with more than one test, a composite T score will be calculated by standardizing the average of each T score. Furthermore, a global composite score (for all seven domains) and a neurocognitive composite score (for the first 6 domains) will be also calculated by standardizing the average of the T score (Lane HY et al, JAMA Psychiatry 2013)

Week 0, 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Global Assessment of Functioning composite
Time Frame: week 0, 4, 8, 12
Assessment of social, occupational, and psychological function. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean better function.
week 0, 4, 8, 12
Change of Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: week 0, 4, 8, 12
Assessment of life quality. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:126, the higher scores mean a better outcome.
week 0, 4, 8, 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Time Frame: week 0, 4, 8, 12
Assessment of overall symptoms. Minimum value: 30, maximum value:210, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
week 0, 4, 8, 12
Change of scales for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) total score
Time Frame: week 0, 4, 8, 12
Assessment of negative symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
week 0, 4, 8, 12
Change of Positive subscale of PANSS
Time Frame: week 0, 4, 8, 12
Assessment of positive symptoms. Minimum value: 7, maximum value:49, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
week 0, 4, 8, 12
Change of Negative subscale of PANSS
Time Frame: week 0, 4, 8, 12
Assessment of negative symptoms. Minimum value: 7, maximum value:49, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
week 0, 4, 8, 12
Change of General Psychopathology subscale of PANSS
Time Frame: week 0, 4, 8, 12
Assessment of general psychopathology. Minimum value: 16, maximum value:112, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
week 0, 4, 8, 12
Change of Clinical Global Impression
Time Frame: week 0, 4, 8, 12
Assessment of general impression. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:7, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
week 0, 4, 8, 12
Change of Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
Time Frame: week 0, 4, 8, 12
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:52, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.
week 0, 4, 8, 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Placebo Cap

3
Subscribe