Evaluation of the Effect of Prosthetic Management for Congenital Cleft Lip and Palate Infants on the Middle Ear Function

October 4, 2023 updated by: Kamel Salah, Alexandria University

Evaluation of the Effect of Prosthetic Management for Congenital Cleft Lip and Palate Infants on the Middle Ear Function: Clinical Trial

Aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of feeding appliance for congenital cleft lip and palate infants on the middle ear function

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt, 21527
        • Faculty of dentistry, Alexandria university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with bilateral cleft lip and palate.
  • Centralized pre-maxilla that does not need active appliance.
  • Normal inner ear and auditory nerve function.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infant with unilateral cleft lip and palate or cleft palate only.
  • Deviated pre-maxilla that needs active appliance.
  • Congenital hearing problems or sensorineural hearing loss/

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Feeding appliance immediately after birth
A preliminary alginate impression was made using wax stock tray to get a preliminary cast and construct a self-cure acrylic custom-made tray. A Medium viscosity rubber base impression material was used for making final impression which in turn will be poured to obtain a master cast. On this master cast, a feeding appliance will be constructed. Readymade facebow with two straight side length of hard, rounded, of 2mm diameter, 15cm length Nickel-Chrome wire with omega loops (at the end of the wire) was used to form extra-oral wings to be used as a retentive aid to maintain the prosthesis in situ. The appliance was fabricated in clear acrylic resin then finished and polished. A small piece of cold cure acrylic resin was added and adapted to the omega loops and manipulated to follow the checks contour.
Experimental: Feeding appliance after 1-3 months
A preliminary alginate impression was made using wax stock tray to get a preliminary cast and construct a self-cure acrylic custom-made tray. A Medium viscosity rubber base impression material was used for making final impression which in turn will be poured to obtain a master cast. On this master cast, a feeding appliance will be constructed. Readymade facebow with two straight side length of hard, rounded, of 2mm diameter, 15cm length Nickel-Chrome wire with omega loops (at the end of the wire) was used to form extra-oral wings to be used as a retentive aid to maintain the prosthesis in situ. The appliance was fabricated in clear acrylic resin then finished and polished. A small piece of cold cure acrylic resin was added and adapted to the omega loops and manipulated to follow the checks contour.
Experimental: Feeding appliance after 4 -12 months
A preliminary alginate impression was made using wax stock tray to get a preliminary cast and construct a self-cure acrylic custom-made tray. A Medium viscosity rubber base impression material was used for making final impression which in turn will be poured to obtain a master cast. On this master cast, a feeding appliance will be constructed. Readymade facebow with two straight side length of hard, rounded, of 2mm diameter, 15cm length Nickel-Chrome wire with omega loops (at the end of the wire) was used to form extra-oral wings to be used as a retentive aid to maintain the prosthesis in situ. The appliance was fabricated in clear acrylic resin then finished and polished. A small piece of cold cure acrylic resin was added and adapted to the omega loops and manipulated to follow the checks contour.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of middle ear pressure
Time Frame: up to one year of age

This was performed using Tympanometer that measures the air pressure in the middle ear to obtain Tympanogram which is a graphic representation of how the eardrum moves in response to the air pressure in the ear canal. Tympanometry was performed using a AT235 tympanometer with a 226-Hz probe frequency. It was calibrated to ANSI standards (American National Standards Institute,1987).

The normal middle-ear pressure values for children are +50 daPa to -200 daPa.

up to one year of age
Assessment of middle ear compliance
Time Frame: up to one year of age

This was performed using Tympanometer.

The patients' tympanometric results were classified into three types:

  • Type A: Static compliance greater than 0.1 ml and the point of greatest compliance is at approximately 0 daPa; the curve is shown by a large, inverted V. In a "type A" curve, the peak compliance occurs at or near atmospheric pressure indicating normal pressure within the middle ear.
  • Type B: The point of greatest compliance cannot be found, and the curve is shown by a flat curve (no peak). This is indicative of non-compressible fluid within the middle ear space (otitis media), tympanic membrane perforation, or debris within the external ear canal.
  • Type C: Static compliance greater than or equal to 0.2 ml, and the peak compliance is significantly below zero (usually less than -200), indicating negative pressure (sub-atmospheric) within the middle ear space.

Type A tympanograms were classified as normal, but types B and C were considered abnormal

up to one year of age
Assessment of hearing quality
Time Frame: up to one year of age

Audiometric screening will be performed using Auditory brainstem response (ABR) conducted under natural sleep as far as possible. ABR can provide information about the softest level of sound the ear can hear. It is traditionally used to determine the degree of hearing loss in pediatrics.

ABR test uses electrodes attached with adhesive to the baby's scalp. While the baby is sleeping, clicking sounds were made through headphones over the baby's ears. The test measures the brain's activity in response to the sounds.

Hearing level thresholds as estimated by ABR are categorized as normal (25 - 35 dB nHL), mild (35 - 45 dB nHL), moderate (45 - 65 dB nHL), severe (65 - 90 dB nHL), and profound (90 dB nHL) hearing loss.

up to one year of age

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe