Muscle Stem Cell Quality in Atrophy (ATROMAB)

March 2, 2026 updated by: Maastricht University Medical Center

In Vitro Quality Assessment of Myogenic Stem Cells in Multiple Patient Groups With Confirmed Skeletal Muscle Atrophy to Study Their Potential for Autologous Stem Cell Therapy

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the quality of mesoangioblasts isolated from various patient groups suffering from muscle atrophy. This study includes cancer cachexia and muscle-impaired elderly and a control group of the same age.

The quality will be defined on these following outcomes:

  • The number and distribution of the mesoangioblasts in a muscle biopsy to define if there are sufficient mesoangioblasts to start a culture.
  • The proliferation capacity to define if we can culture them the numbers required for systemic treatment.
  • The myogenic capacity to define if the mesoangioblasts are sufficiently capable to generate muscle fibres.

Participants will:

  • Undergo a muscle biopsy (needle biopsy or rest material from surgery, ~50mg)
  • Donate blood (~20 ml)
  • Fill in SARC-F questionnaire (evaluate sarcopenia score)
  • Fill in SQUASH questionnaire (evaluate physical activity of previous week) Researchers will compare groups (muscle-impaired elderly vs control; cancer cachexia vs control) to see if there is a difference regarding quality. These results will define the potential of autologous mesoangioblast therapy within these groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

No effective treatment is available for the loss of muscle tissue in non-genetic muscle diseases such as (cancer) cachexia and sarcopenia. Such a treatment would improve the quality of life, therapy success, and independency of these patients. The administration of healthy autologous muscle stem cells, called mesoangioblasts, that lead to muscle regeneration and increased muscle mass and function could be a novel therapeutic strategy to achieve this. A prerequisite is that the therapeutic potential of these mesoangioblasts is sufficient. Therefore, the main aim of this study is to assess this potential for mesoangioblasts of patients with lung cancer cachexia and with sarcopenia and determine the effect the cancer or age might have on the therapeutic potential.

This study is part of a larger project, called Generate Your Muscle (GYM), which aims to develop and commercially produce a stem cell therapy for recovery of muscle mass and strength in patients with genetic and non-genetic muscle disease and muscle breakdown. This will be achieved by administering large numbers of autologous mesoangioblasts (MABs) as an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (asCTMP) in the arteries, which will migrate to the damaged muscle, thereby restoring muscle mass and function. This strategy can only be successful for patients suffering from cachexia or sarcopenia, if these patients have enough mesoangioblasts, if these MABs can proliferate into the numbers requested for systemic treatment, if the energy capacity of the MABs is sufficient and if these mesoangioblasts still have a high myogenic potential. The aim of this study is to determine these parameters for patients with cancer cachexia or sarcopenia, as we know that they can be affected by the underlying condition. They will be compared to age-matched controls. If positive, the MABs will qualify as asCTMP for a clinical trial in a follow-up study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Limburg
      • Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6229HX
        • Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Two study populations are included in this study. The Muscle Impaired Elderly (MIE) are considered elderly who struggle with muscle weakness. MIE is used as a substitute group for sarcopenia as their muscle weakness and daily impairments are confirmed, but confirmation via medical imaging lacks. Sarcopenia is multifactorial and the balance between nutrition and activity is disturbed.

Cachexia is defined as an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass due to an illness that cannot be reversed by conventional nutrition and/or exercise. Lung cancer cachexia is a group where non-small cell lung cancer is confirmed along with non-intentional weight loss.

Both groups will be compared to a Control group consisting of eldery undergoing knee/hip/back surgery but are otherwise considered healthy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Lung cancer cachexia:

  • Diagnosed with NSCLC, stage III-IV
  • Diagnosed with cachexia (>5% unintentional body weight loss in past six months, >2% body weight loss with BMI <20, or skeletal muscle index for males <7.26 kg/m2; females <5.45 kg/m2)
  • Age 50-60 or 60-70
  • Written informed consent

Patient group: MIE

  • Scheduled for total hip, knee, or back surgery
  • Age 60-70 or 70-80 year
  • Written informed consent

Controls

  • Patients with scheduled knee-, hip-, and back surgery
  • Age 50-60, 60-70, and 70-80 year
  • Age and sex-matched to patient groups
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No filled-in IC
  • Suffering from a muscular dystrophy or other disease known to affect muscle morphology or function
  • Have a weekly alcohol intake of ≥ 35 units (men) or ≥ 24 units (women)
  • Ongoing participation in other intervention clinical trials
  • Major surgery of the muscle within 4 weeks of the visit unrelated to the study
  • Patients unable and/or unwilling to comply with treatment and study instructions
  • Any other factor that in the opinion of the investigator excludes the patient from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Muscle impaired elderly
Elderly scheduled for hip/knee/back surgery with III-IV ASA score, low grip strength and high scoring for sarcopenia
In vitro analysis on isolated mesoangioblasts obtained from muscle biopsies
Lung cancer cachexia
Non-small cell lung cancer patients stage III with reported cachexia
In vitro analysis on isolated mesoangioblasts obtained from muscle biopsies
Controls
Elderly scheduled for hip/knee/back surgery without any recorded muscle defects, I-II ASA score, average or high grip strength, low scoring for sarcopenia.
In vitro analysis on isolated mesoangioblasts obtained from muscle biopsies

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of mesoangioblasts ex vivo isolated from muscle biopsy
Time Frame: 1 day
The number of mesoangioblasts obtained from a muscle biopsy. Once cells reached >80% confluency in a culture dish, FACS analysis will determine the amount of mesoangioblasts obtained.
1 day
Proliferation capacity of mesoangioblasts in vitro
Time Frame: 1 day
The proliferation capacity to define whether we can culture them in the numbers required for systemic treatment. Doubling time will be assessed 3 separate instances with a hemocytometer. Population doubling level = 3.32 (log viable cells at harvest - log seeded cells)
1 day
Myogenic capacity of mesoangioblasts in vitro
Time Frame: 1 day
The myogenic capacity to define if the mesoangioblasts are sufficiently capable to generate muscle fibres. Myogenic capacity is calculated as the number of nuclei in MF20-positive fibers divided by total number of nuclei per field.
1 day
Distribution of mesoangioblasts in a muscle biopsy
Time Frame: 1 day
The number of mesoangioblasts in a muscle biopsy. Histochemistry will reveal the location of the pericyte-like mesoangioblasts surrounding the blood vessels when stained for pericyte marker NG2 proteoglycan.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Homing potential of mesoangioblasts in vitro
Time Frame: 1 day
The homing potential of the mesoangioblasts in these patients by characterizing inflammatory parameters via qPCR. Muscle damage reflected by inflammation is essential for the migration and engraftment of mesoangioblasts in the affected muscles. Differences in gene expression levels of cytokine IL6 and cytokine mediator HMGB1 in the groups MIE and Lung cancer patients vs Controls will be determined.
1 day
ATP production of mesoangioblasts in vitro
Time Frame: 1 day
ATP production as a marker for metabolic health will be determined via the CellTiterGlo assay. Luminescence (Relative Light Unit) corrected for DNA content per well determines the ATP production.
1 day
Difference in myogenic potential of mesoangioblasts and satellite cells in vitro
Time Frame: 1 day
Differences in myogenic potential between mesoangioblasts and satellite cells with respect due cachexia and sarcopenia. Myogenic capacity is calculated as the number of nuclei in MF20-positive fibers divided by total number of nuclei per field.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Monique Hochstenbag, MD, PhD, Maastricht University Medical Centre
  • Principal Investigator: Bert Smeets, Professor, Maastricht University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 27, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

February 16, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe